RESUMO
Background and Aims: Doppler waveform analysis of carotid artery has been found to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing elective surgeries. We evaluated the role of carotid artery corrected flow time (FTc) and respiratory variation of blood flow peak velocity (ðVpeak) in predicting post induction hypotension in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis. Material and Methods: Adult patients (n = 60) with perforation peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia (GA) were recruited in this prospective, observational study. Carotid ultrasonography was performed pre-induction, to determine FTc and ðVpeak. Post-induction hemodynamic parameters were recorded for 5 minutes. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between hypotension and carotid artery measurements. Results: Post-induction hypotension occurred in 48.3% of patients. The carotid artery FTc was significantly lower (P = 0.008) in patients who developed post-induction hypotension, but ðVpeak was statistically similar (P = 0.62) in both groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed a statistically significant correlation between FTc and systolic blood pressure (SBP) change at one-minute post induction (r2 = -0.29, P = 0.03); however statistical significance were not achieved at 2 minutes and 3 minutes (P = 0.05 at both time points). Carotid artery FTc had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.57-0.84) to predict post-induction hypotension and best cutoff value of 344.8 ms with a sensitivity and specificity of 61% and 79%, respectively. Carotid artery ðVpeak had an AUROC curve (95% CI) of 0.54 (0.39-0.69) to predict post-induction hypotension and best cutoff value of 7.9% with a sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 55%, respectively. Conclusion: Carotid artery FTc and ðVpeak are not reasonable predictors of hypotension in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a type of pneumonia caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 pneumonia has characteristic radiological features. Recent evidence indicates usefulness of chest X-ray and lung ultrasound (LUS) in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, chest X-ray and LUS features of 50 adults with COVID-19 pneumonia at the time of presentation were described. RESULTS: Chest X-ray findings were present in 96% of patients, whereas all patients have ultrasound finding. Proportion (95% CI) of patients having bilateral opacities in chest X-ray was 96% (86.5-98.9%), ground glass opacity 74% (60.5-84.1%), and consolidation 50% (36.7-63.4%). In LUS, shred sign and thickened pleura was present in all patients recruited in this study. Air bronchogram was present in at least one area in 80% of all patients and B-lines score of more than 2 was present in at least one lung area in 84% patients. Number of lung areas with "shred sign" were higher in hypoxemic (p = 0.005) and tachypneic (p = 0.006) patients and pleura line abnormalities were present in more lung areas in hypoxemic patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: According to our study, LUS is a useful tool not only in diagnosing, but it also correlates with requirement of respiratory support in COVID-19 patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Behera S, Maitra S, Anand RK, Baidya DK, Subramaniam R, Kayina CA, et al. Thoracic Radiological Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients at the Time of Presentation: A Cross-sectional Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):85-87.
RESUMO
How to cite this article: Kayina CA, Maitra S, Anand RK, Ray BR, Baidya DK, Subramaniam R. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Presenting with Hyperglycemia and Ketosis: A Case Series of Three Diabetic Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(11):1141-1142.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) position is necessary to ensure proper ventilation. The present study was conducted with the aim to compare the efficacy of three ultrasonographic (USG) techniques in terms of time taken for confirmation of ETT position. The time taken by each USG technique was also compared with that for auscultation and capnography. The ability of the three USG techniques to identify tracheal placement of ETT was evaluated in all patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety adult American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were randomised into three groups (n = 30 each) depending upon the initial USG transducer position used to confirm tracheal placement of ETT: group T (tracheal), group P (pleural) and group D (diaphragm). The time taken for confirmation of tracheal placement of ETT by USG, auscultation and capnography was recorded for each of the groups. Subsequently, USG confirmation of ETT placement was performed with the other two USG techniques in all patients. RESULTS: The time taken for USG in group T was significantly less (3.8 ± 0.9 s) compared to group P (12.1 ± 1.6 s) and group D (13.8 ± 1.7 s); P < 0.001. USG was significantly faster than both auscultation and capnography in group T (P < 0.001), whereas in group P and group D, USG took longer time compared to auscultation (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively) but lesser time than capnography (P < 0.001 in both groups). CONCLUSION: USG is a rapid technique for identification of ETT placement. All the three USG techniques are reliable in identifying the tracheal placement of ETT.
