[Prevalence of various urination disorders in residents of the Republic of Dagestan].

PURPOSE: to evaluate the prevalence of various urination disorders in residents of the Republic of Dagestan, and, thus, to improve their diagnosis and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 584 residents (264 men and 320 women) from different regions of the Republic of Dagestan took part in an anonymous questionnaire survey: 165 residents of Makhachkala, including 92 men and 73 women; 86 residents of Derbent and villages of Southern Dagestan, including 30 men and 56 women; 73 residents of Khasavyurt and Kizilyurt, including 34 men and 39 women; 53 residents of Buynaksk, including 19 men and 34 women; 42 residents of Izberbash, including 19 men and 23 women; 58 residents of the Kaspiysk, 29 men and 29 women; 42 residents of Kayakent, 4 men and 38 women; 65 residents of other regions of the Republic of Dagestan (Karabudakhkent, Gumbet, Gunibsk, Shamil, Khunzakh, Botlikh, Kazbek, Levashin, Tlyaratin, and Tsumadin regions), 37 men and 28 women. RESULTS: According to the survey of the residents of the Republic of Dagestan, a significant prevalence of various urinary disorders (63.5%) was found among both men (61.7%) and women (65.0%). Unfortunately, not all patients seek medical advice with complaints of dysuria (55.5%). The fact that 18.8% of patients do not know that they can get help, and 24.1% believe that they do not have a good doctor in their region can be considered as the most an unfavorable moment in terms of the reasons for the refusal of visiting a doctor.. CONCLUSIONS: All this findings suggest the need for educational programs both for physicians and the population (educative activities).

[Urination disorders. Do we know all about them?].

The article presents the results of the pilot questionnaire survey of doctors of various specialties, living in some cities in the Southern Federal District, in the diagnosis and treatment of various urination disorders. The survey involved 101 urologists, 33 obstetricians, 37 internists, 35 surgeons, 9 neurologists and 1 infectiologist. Inadequate training of doctors of various specialties regarding the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders of urination of inflammatory and non-inflammatory nature should be noted. Misunderstanding of differential diagnosis of various forms of urinary incontinence and tactics of management of each of them come under notice. Most urologists (95.46%), obstetricians (92.3%), physicians (100%), neurologists (66.6%), and surgeons (88.58%) did not have a thorough knowledge about the symptoms of overactive bladder (OB). Only 63.37 % of the entire group of respondents, and 81% of urologists using conservative therapies, has prescribed M-anticholinergics for the treatment of OB. In the treatment of urgent forms of urinary incontinence, only 64.5% of urologists use M-anticholinergics. Excessive use of M-anticholinergics for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence still persists--38% of urologists. alpha-blockers are the main group of drugs (96.6%) used in medical treatment of LUTS in benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there is reduced (14.8%) understanding of the need to designate combination therapy with M-cholinergic antagonists when indicated. The issues of therapy of patients with lower urinary tract infections, namely the choice of antibiotics without considering antibiotic sensitivity and antibiotic resistance and knowledge of Russian and national guidelines and recommendations of the European Association of Urology are of particular concern. Curiously enough, there is underestimation of this issue by urologists (23%) compared to obstetricians (45%) and physicians (40.7%). These findings can determine the need for education programs for professionals in different areas of medicine, because patients with urination disorders occur in practice of doctors of various related specialties.