Nasopharyngeal Staphylococcus aureus colonization among HIV-infected children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and association with Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization.

Background: Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae are common inhabitants of the nasopharynx of children. HIV-infected children have higher risk of invasive diseases caused by these pathogens. With widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus , the interaction between S. aureus and S. pneumoniae is of a particular significance. We sought to determine the magnitude of colonization by methicillin-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus and colonization by S. pneumoniae ; associated risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among HIV-infected children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Method: A prospective observational study was conducted among 183 HIV-infected children at ALERT hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from September 2016 to August 2018. S. aureus and S. pneumoniae were identified using standard bacteriological techniques, antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on S. aureus and screening for methicillin resistance was carried out by amplifying the mecA gene. Risk factors were analysed by using binary logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of nasopharyngeal S. aureus , MRSA and S. pneumoniae colonization were 27.3, 2.7 and 43.2 %, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated an inverse association between S. aureus and S. pneumoniae nasopharyngeal colonization [aOR, 0.49; CI, (0.24, 0.99); P=0.046]. The highest level of resistance in both methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA was observed against tetracycline. Conclusions: . We found an inverse association between S. aureus and S. pneumoniae colonization among HIV-infected children. Continued assessment of the impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and antiretroviral therapy on nasopharyngeal bacterial ecology is warranted.

Saliva is superior over nasopharyngeal swab for detecting SARS-CoV2 in COVID-19 patients.

Scaling up of diagnostic capacity is needed to mitigate the global pandemic of SARS-CoV2. However, there are challenges including shortage of sample collection swabs and transport medium. Saliva has been recommended as a simple, low-cost, non-invasive option. However, data from different populations and settings are limited. Here, we showed that saliva could be a good alternative sample to diagnose COVID-19 patients. Pair of NPS-saliva samples was collected from 152 symptomatic; confirmed COVID-19 patients, and compared their positivity rate, viral load, and duration of viral shedding. From 152 patients, 80 (52.63%) tested positive and 72 (47.37%) were negative for SARSA-CoV2 in NPS sample. In saliva, 129 (92.14%) were tested positive and 11 (7.86%) were negative on the day of admission to hospital. The overall percent agreement of RT-PCR result of Saliva to NPS was 70% (196/280). A comparison of viral load from 72 NPS-saliva pair samples on day of admission shows saliva contains significantly higher viral load (P < 0.001). In conclusion, saliva has higher yield in detecting SARS-CoV2, and COVID-19 patients show higher viral load and prolonged period of viral shedding in saliva. Therefore, we recommend saliva as a better alternative sample to NPS to diagnose COVID-19 patients.