Sutureless Conjunctiva-Sparing Posterior Ptosis Repair Surgery: A Novel Technique.

PURPOSE: Müller muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) is a popular posterior/internal surgical approach to cases of mild to moderate blepharoptosis with good levator function. MMCR necessitates the removal of healthy conjunctiva and exposes the cornea to suture material. The goal of this study is to describe a novel sutureless conjunctiva-sparing Müllerectomy (CSM) surgery and demonstrate its long-term efficacy, efficiency, and safety. DESIGN: IRB approved retrospective study of patients undergoing sutureless conjunctiva-sparing posterior ptosis repair surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 100 patients (171 eyes) who underwent sutureless CSM with a minimum follow-up interval of 6 months were retrospectively reviewed. Photographs were analyzed using ImageJ software. Outcome measures were derived from margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and palpebral fissure height (PFH) at various postoperative timepoints. RESULTS: Mean ΔMRD1 and ΔPFH at 6 months were 2.85 ± 0.98 mm and 2.60 ± 1.38 mm, respectively. Symmetry within 1 mm was observed 91% of cases. Sutureless CSM took 4.42 minutes on average compared to 8.45 minutes for traditional MMCR. There were no corneal abrasions or ocular complications. The reoperation rate was 2.3% (1 case of overcorrection and 3 cases of undercorrection) per eye. CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless CSM is a promising alternative to traditional MMCR and sutured CSM based on long-term outcomes, symmetry, shorter operative time, and low complication rate. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Change in Lower Eyelid Contour Following Ectropion Repair With Lateral Tarsal Strip.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in lateral canthal angle (LCA), inferior ocular surface exposed (IOSE), lower eyelid curvature, and margin-to-reflex distance 2 in those undergoing lower eyelid ectropion repair using a lateral tarsal strip technique. METHODS: This is an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lower eyelid ectropion repair. This study included all patients from 2012 to 2018 operated on by a single surgeon at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. For each patient, LCA, IOSE, and eyelid curvature were measured on preoperative and postoperative photographs using NIH Image J photographic analysis. These measurements were compared using paired 1-tail t-tests for LCA and IOSE and paired 2-tail t-tests for eyelid curvature. This study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant with protection of individually identifiable information. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with lower eyelid ectropion underwent lower eyelid ectropion repair using a lateral tarsal strip technique. Forty-three of the patients underwent a bilateral lower eyelid ectropion repair. There was no statistically significant difference in the LCA. There was a reduction in IOSE among both cohorts. The fourth degree polynomial trendlines generated to assess eyelid curvature demonstrated statistical significance, suggesting a flattening of eyelid curvature. margin-to-reflex distance 2 also had a statistically significant decrease postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower eyelid ectropion repair using a lateral tarsal strip approach causes a reduction in IOSE, a more gradual lower eyelid curvature, and a decrease in margin-to-reflex distance 2 without causing a statistically significant change in LCA.

Patients' Adherence to Recommended Follow-up Eye Care After Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in a Publicly Funded County Clinic and Factors Associated With Follow-up Eye Care Use.

IMPORTANCE: The public health success of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening programs depends on patients' adherence to the timetable of follow-up eye care recommended by the screening program. African Americans are among those at highest risk for DR and have one of the lowest rates of eye care use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the rate of adhering to recommended follow-up eye care in a DR screening program administered in a safety-net health care facility and to examine factors associated with follow-up eye care use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective follow-up study of persons with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The setting was an internal medicine clinic of a publicly funded health system in Alabama, serving a population largely uninsured and African American, that had implemented a DR screening program using a nonmydriatic camera for ocular imaging and remote reading centers for evaluation of images. Patients with physician appointments between January 26 and July 24, 2012, were eligible for screening if they had a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes and were 19 years or older. Data from the county health system's administrative database were obtained from January 26, 2012 (date of first enrollee), through May 1, 2015, to establish participants' eye care use in the ophthalmology clinic after screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adherence to the recommended interval of follow-up eye appointments in the facility's ophthalmology service as determined by administrative records, as well as factors associated with adherence. RESULTS: Diabetic retinopathy screening was completed in 949 adults with diabetes, of whom 84.5% (802 of 949) were African American, 64.5% (612 of 949) were women, and 71.7% (680 of 949) lacked health insurance. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 95 years, and their mean (SD) age was 53.9 (10.4) years. The mean (SD) age at diabetes diagnosis was 44.3 (12.5) years, and the mean (SD) duration of diabetes was 9.6 (9.4) years. Across interval recommendation types, 29.9% (284 of 949) adhered to obtaining comprehensive follow-up eye care within the recommended time frame. Two years after a participant's screening date, 50.9% (483 of 949) had no record of having received eye care. Factors associated with adhering to interval appointments were having an advanced age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and knowing one's glycated hemoglobin level (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.34-2.97). Agreeing to assistance in making a follow-up eye care appointment was associated with nonadherence (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After a DR screening program in a public clinic largely serving an African American population, only one-third of participants adhered to interval recommendations for follow-up eye appointments, even though cost and accessibility were minimized as barriers to care. Our findings suggest that DR screening programs are not likely to meet their public health goals without incorporation of eye health education initiatives successfully promoting adherence to recommended comprehensive eye care for preventing vision loss.