An investigation of the effects of touchpad location within a notebook computer.

This study evaluated effects of the location of a notebook computer's integrated touchpad, complimenting previous work in the area of desktop mouse location effects. Most often integrated touchpads are located in the computer's wrist rest, and centered on the keyboard. This study characterized effects of this bottom center location and four alternatives (top center, top right, right side, and bottom right) upon upper extremity posture, discomfort, preference, and performance. Touchpad location was found to significantly impact each of those measures. The top center location was particularly poor, in that it elicited more ulnar deviation, more shoulder flexion, more discomfort, and perceptions of performance impedance. In general, the bottom center, bottom right, and right side locations fared better, though subjects' wrists were more extended in the bottom locations. Suggestions for notebook computer design are provided.

Effects of semi-rigid arch-support orthotics: an investigation with potential ergonomic implications.

For many years, arch-support orthotics have been prescribed for individuals with discomfort and/or abnormal skeletal alignments in the structures of the lower extremity. Recently there has been an increased interest in promoting semi-rigid orthotics as an ergonomic aid for asymptomatic workers who must stand all day at their workplace. A laboratory study was performed to assess the biomechanical impact of prefabricated semi-rigid orthotics on asymptomatic individuals. Ten subjects wore semi-rigid arch-support orthotics (experimental condition) for two months and flexible polyurethane/Sorbothane shoe inserts (control condition) for two months. Throughout this 18-week testing period, the subjects returned to the lab to perform a battery of assessment tests at regularly scheduled intervals. These tests examined subject strength, standing posture, stability, fatigue effects, and body part discomfort. The results of this study showed no significant changes in the strength, posture, or stability as a function of insert type. The subjects reported a reduction in low-back discomfort along with an increase in foot discomfort during a fatiguing exertion task while wearing the semi-rigid orthotics as compared to the control condition.

Continuous assessment of back stress (CABS): a new method to quantify low-back stress in jobs with variable biomechanical demands.

Jobs with a high degree of variability in manual materials handling requirements expose limitations in current low-back injury risk assessment tools and emphasize the need for a probabilistic representation of the biomechanical stress in order to quantify both acute and cumulative trauma risk. We developed a hybrid assessment methodology that employs established assessment tools and then represents their evaluations in a way that emphasizes the distributions of biomechanical stress. Construction work activities in the home building industry were evaluated because of the high degree of variability in the manual material handling requirements. Each task was evaluated using the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation, The University of Michigan Three-Dimensional Static Strength Prediction Program, and the Ohio State University Lumbar Motion Monitor Model. The output from each model was presented as time-weighted histograms of low-back stress, and the assessments were compared. The results showed considerable differences in what were considered high-risk activities, indicating that these 3 assessment tools consider the risk of low-back injury from different perspectives. The time-weighted distribution aspect of this methodology also contributed vital information toward the identification of high-risk activities. These results illustrate the necessity for more advanced low-back injury risk assessment techniques for jobs with highly variable manual materials handling requirements.

Selective activation of the external oblique musculature during axial torque production.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether different geographical regions of the external oblique musculature can activate at different levels and, if they do, to quantify the magnitude of these differences as a function of postural parameters during twisting exertions. DESIGN: Repeated measures design using electromyography on healthy subjects. BACKGROUND: The majority of the models currently used to assess spinal loading have represented the trunk musculature using single force vectors connecting a muscle's point of origin to its point of insertion. However, for muscles with large areas of origin and/or insertion (such as the external obliques), this single vector modelling approach misrepresents the multiple vector reality which, in turn, underestimates the complex loads these muscles can develop. METHODS: Nine subjects performed sub-maximal isometric axial twisting exertions (20, 40 and 60% of maximum voluntary contraction) while assuming six different postures defined by three levels of axial rotation (-20 degrees, 0 degrees and 20 degrees ) and two levels of sagittal flexion (0 degrees and 20 degrees ). As the subjects performed these isometric exertions, the integrated electromyographic activity was sampled using surface electrodes at five different locations over the right and the left external oblique muscles. RESULTS: The results showed significant (p<0.05) regional differences in the activation profiles and these activation profiles changed as a function of trunk posture. CONCLUSIONS: The external oblique musculature is capable of differential activation and the activation profiles of the different regions are affected by the posture of the torso. RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that the external oblique muscle is capable of selective activation of different regions along its cross-section and should, therefore, be modelled using multiple vectors. The result can have a direct bearing on the calculated spine loading, especially lateral and anterior/posterior shear forces.