Membrane progesterone receptors on the cell membrane: A review highlighting potential export motifs in mPRα regulating its trafficking to the cell surface.

Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the nongenomic actions, ligand binding, intracellular signaling pathways, and functions of membrane progesterone receptors (mPRs) in reproductive and nonreproductive tissues since their discovery 20 years ago. The five mPRs are members of the progestin adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family which also includes adiponectin receptors (AdipoRs). However, unlike AdipoRs, the 3-D structures of mPRs are unknown, and their structural characteristics remain poorly understood. The mechanisms regulating mPR functions and their trafficking to the cell surface have received little attention and have not been systematically reviewed. This paper summarizes some structural aspects of mPRs, including the ligand binding pocket of mPRα recently derived from homology modeling with AdipoRs, and the proposed topology of mPRs from the preponderance of positively charged amino acid residues in their intracellular domains. The mechanisms of trafficking membrane receptors to the cell surface are discussed, including the amino acid motifs involved with their export to the cell surface, the roles of adaptor proteins, and post-translational glycosylation and palmitoylation modifications that promote cell surface expression and retention. Evidence for similar mechanisms regulating the expression and functions of mPRs on the cell surface is discussed, including the identification of potential export motifs on mPRα required for its trafficking to the cell membrane. Collectively, these results have identified several potential mechanisms regulating the expression and functions of mPRs on the cell membrane for further investigation.

Molecular modeling, mutational analysis and steroid specificity of the ligand binding pocket of mPRα (PAQR7): Shared ligand binding with AdipoR1 and its structural basis.

The 7-transmembrane architecture of adiponectin receptors (AdipoRs), determined from their X-ray crystal structures, was used for homology modeling of another progesterone and adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family member, membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRα). The mPRα model identified excess positively charged residues on the cytosolic side, suggesting it has the same membrane orientation as AdipoRs with an intracellular N-terminus. The homology model showed identical amino acid residues to those forming the zinc binding pocket in AdipoRs, which strongly implies that zinc is also present in mPRα. The homology model showed a critical H-bond interaction between the glutamine (Q) residue at 206 in the binding pocket and the 20-carbonyl of progesterone. Mutational analysis showed no progesterone binding to the arginine (R) 206 mutant and modeling predicted this was due to the strong positive charge of arginine stabilizing the presence of an oleic acid (C18:1) molecule in the binding pocket, as observed in the X-rays of AdipoRs. High Zn2+ concentrations are predicted to form a salt with the carboxylate group of the oleic acid, thereby eliminating its binding to the free fatty acid (FFA) binding pocket, and allowing progesterone to bind. This is supported by experiments showing 100 µM Zn2+ addition restored [3H]-progesterone binding of the Q206R mutant to levels in WT mPRα and increased [3H]-progesterone binding to mPRγ and AdipoR1 which have arginine residues in this region. The model predicts hydrophobic interactions of progesterone with amino acid residues surrounding the binding pocket, including valine 146 in TM3, which when mutated into a polar serine resulted in a complete loss of [3H]-progesterone binding. The mPRα model showed there is no hydrogen bond donor in the vicinity of the 3-keto group of progesterone and ligand structure-activity studies with 3-deoxy steroids revealed that, unlike the nuclear progesterone receptor, the 3-carbonyl oxygen is not essential for binding to mPRα. Interestingly, the small synthetic AdipoR agonist, AdipoRon, displayed binding affinity for mPRα and mimicked progesterone signaling, whereas D-e-MAPP, a ceramidase inhibitor, blocked progesterone signaling. Thus, critical residues around the binding pocket and steroid structures that bind mPRα, as well as similarities with AdipoRs, can be predicted from the homology model.

Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery.

The past decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in preclinical drug discovery with structure-based drug design (SBDD) making a comeback while high-throughput screening (HTS) methods have continued to generate disappointing results. There is a deficit of information between identified hits and the many criteria that must be fulfilled in parallel to convert them into preclinical candidates that have a real chance to become a drug. This gap can be bridged by investigating the interactions between the ligands and their receptors. Accurate calculations of the free energy of binding are still elusive; however progresses were made with respect to how one may deal with the versatile role of water. A corpus of knowledge combining X-ray structures, bioinformatics and molecular modeling techniques now allows drug designers to routinely produce receptor homology models of increasing quality. These models serve as a basis to establish and validate efficient rationales used to tailor and/or screen virtual libraries with enhanced chances of obtaining hits. Many case reports of successful SBDD show how synergy can be gained from the combined use of several techniques. The role of SBDD with respect to two different classes of widely investigated pharmaceutical targets: (a) protein kinases (PK) and (b) G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) is discussed. Throughout these examples prototypical situations covering the current possibilities and limitations of SBDD are presented.

Comparison between steroid binding to membrane progesterone receptor alpha (mPRalpha) and to nuclear progesterone receptor: correlation with physicochemical properties assessed by comparative molecular field analysis and identification of mPRalpha-specific agonists.

Recent results showing that the binding characteristics of 33 steroids for human membrane progesterone receptor alpha (hu-mPRalpha) differ from those for the nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR) suggest that hu-mPRalpha-specific agonists can be identified for investigating its physiological functions. The binding affinities of an additional 21 steroids for hu-mPRalpha were determined to explore the structure-activity relationships in more detail and to identify potent, specific mPRalpha agonists. Four synthetic progesterone derivatives with methyl or methylene groups on positions 18 or 19, 18a-methylprogesterone (18-CH(3)P4, Org OE 64-0), 13-ethenyl-18-norprogesterone (18-CH(2)P4, Org 33663-0), 19a-methylprogesterone (19-CH(3)P4, Org OD 13-0) and 10-ethenyl-19-norprogesterone (19-CH(2)P4, Org OD 02-0), showed similar or higher affinities than progesterone for hu-mPRalpha and displayed mPRalpha agonist activities in G-protein and MAP kinase activation assays. All four steroids also bound to the nPR in cytosolic fractions of MCF-7 cells. However, two compounds, 19-CH(2)P4 and 19-CH(3)P4, showed no nPR agonist activity in a nPR reporter assay and therefore are selective mPRalpha agonists suitable for physiological investigations. The structure-binding relationships of the combined series of 54 steroids for hu-mPRalpha deviated strikingly from those of a published set of 60 3-keto or 3-desoxy steroids for nPR. Close correlations were observed between the receptor binding affinities of the steroids and their physicochemical properties calculated by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) for both hu-mPRalpha and nPR. A comparison of the CoMFA field graphs for the two receptors revealed several differences in the structural features required for binding to hu-mPRalpha and nPR which could be exploited to develop additional mPR-specific ligands.

A signaling-selective, nanomolar potent allosteric low molecular weight agonist for the human luteinizing hormone receptor.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) activate the LH receptor/cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathway to induce ovulation. As an alternative to parenterally administered hCG to treat anovulatory infertility, orally active low molecular weight (LMW) LHR agonists have been developed at Organon. In this paper, we present the mechanism of action of a prototypic, nanomolar potent and almost full LHR agonist, Org 43553. Org 43553 interacts with the endodomain of the LHR, whereas LH acts via the N-terminal exodomain. LH stimulates the cAMP pathway with an EC50 of 35 pM, but this stimulation is not antagonized by simultaneous incubation with Org 43553. At nanomolar concentrations, LH also stimulates phospholipase C (PLC), but Org 43553 is hardly able to do so. In contrast, Org 43553 inhibits LH-induced PLC (IC50 approximately 10 nM). While Org 43553 stimulates dissociation of [125I]hCG from the LHR and reduces [125I]hCG binding, LH reduces specific [3H]Org 43553 binding. We conclude that Org 43553 is a signaling-selective, allosteric LHR agonist. We hypothesize that Org 43553 and LH induce a similar LHR conformation necessary for activating adenylyl cyclase, which initiates most, if not all, physiological responses of LH.

Use of physicochemical calculation of pKa and CLogP to predict phospholipidosis-inducing potential: a case study with structurally related piperazines.

Several cationic amphiphilic compounds are known to induce phospholipidosis, a condition primarily characterized by excessive accumulation of phospholipids in different cell types, giving the affected cells a finely foamy appearance. Excessive storage of lamellar membranous intralysosomal inclusion bodies is the hallmark for phospholipidosis on the electron microscopic level. In case of alveolar phospholipidosis, foamy macrophages accumulate within the alveolar spaces of the lung. Based on such findings in a one-year toxicity study with gepirone in rats, we studied the molecular properties of this compound and compounds suspected of being phospholipidosis inducers by means of physicochemical calculations. Physicochemical molecular calculations of molecular weight, ClogP (partition coefficient octanol/water), logD at pH 7.4, and pKa were performed, for the cationic amphiphilic compounds chlorpromazine, amiodarone, imipramine, propranolol and fluoxetine, and for the structurally related compounds 1-phenylpiperazine (1-PHP), gepirone (and its major metabolites, 3-OH-gepirone and 1-pyrimidinylpiperazine [1-PP]), and buspirone. ClogP and calculated pKa cluster differently for the amphiphilic drugs compared to the chemical series of piperazines. In line with this analysis, lamellar inclusion bodies were found in an in vitro validation experiment in the human monoblastoid cell line U-937, incubated for 96 h at 10 microg/mL with cationic amphiphilic drugs (amiodarone, imipramine, or propranolol). No such lamellar inclusion bodies were seen for any of the compounds from the chemical series of piperazines including gepirone and its metabolites. The data presented support the use of simple physicochemical calculations of ClogP and pKa to discriminate rapidly between compounds suspected of being phospholipidosis inducers. Finally, the discriminative power of these physicochemical ClogP and pKa calculations to predict phospholipidosis-inducing potential was further validated by extension of the set of compounds.

Physicochemical properties and transport of steroids across Caco-2 cells.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to study the relevant physicochemical properties for the absorption of steroids. METHODS: Various physicochemical properties of steroids were calculated (molecular weight, ClogP, static polar surface area [PSA], etc.). Within this series of steroids, different pharmacological groups were defined. Based on the outcome of this survey, steroids were selected for the Caco-2 permeability study. The apparent permeability coefficients (Papp) were related to the calculated and measured physicochemical properties. RESULTS: Between the defined groups of steroids, ClogP was the most discriminative descriptor. The steroids were well transported over the cell monolayers and the Papp was independent of the concentration and the transport direction. No relationship was found with the PSA; however, the Papp showed a weak inverse correlation with ClogP. CONCLUSIONS: The molecular descriptors and Papp values showed that all steroids are well transported. The small differences in the Papp values showed a weak inverse correlation with ClogP: the hydrophilic steroids (ClogP approximately 0-2) tend to diffuse faster over the cell monolayers compared with the more hydrophobic steroids (ClogP approximately 5). The relationship with ClogP suggests that partitioning of steroids between the biologic membrane and the surrounding aqueous phase is one of the main mechanisms for absorption.

Unique overlap in the prerequisites for thrombin inhibition and oral bioavailability resulting in potent oral antithrombotics.

Despite intense research over the last 10 years, aided by the availability of X-ray structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes, only very few truly orally active thrombin inhibitors have been found. We conducted a comprehensive study starting with peptide transition state analogues (TSA). Both hydrophobic nonpeptide analogues as well as hydrophilic peptidic analogues were synthesized. The bioavailability in rats and dogs could be drastically altered depending on the overall charge distribution in the molecule. Compound 27, a tripeptide TSA inhibitor of thrombin, showed an oral bioavailability of 32% in rats and 71% in dogs, elimination half-lives being 58 and 108 min, respectively. The thrombin inhibition constant of compound 27 was 1.1 nM, and in an in vivo arterial flow model, the ED(50) was 5.4 nmol/kg.min, comparable to known non-TSA inhibitors. A molecular design was found that combines antithrombotic efficiency with oral bioavailability at low dosages.