Validation of the Overactive Bladder-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT): A Potential Alternative to the Standard Bladder Diary for Monitoring OAB Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: An advisory board concluded that a new, comprehensive overactive bladder (OAB) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure should be developed in accordance with regulatory guidelines. The OAB-Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-BAT) was developed with qualitative input from OAB patients and experts to measure symptoms, bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment. OBJECTIVE: Psychometric evaluation of the OAB-BAT assessing PRO OAB symptoms, bother, and impacts during a 7-d recall period. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Psychometric testing was conducted for a 28-d observational study of 170 OAB patients. Eligibility criteria included clinician-confirmed OAB diagnosis with at least eight micturitions per day. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Assessments included the OAB-BAT, a 7-d bladder diary, and co-validating OAB PROs. Analysis included classical and modern test theories. A scoring algorithm was developed and psychometric properties were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The majority of participants were women (72.4%) with moderate OAB symptom severity (53.5%). More than one-third of participants (34.1%) were incontinent. Responses were well balanced across bother and impact items, while symptom frequency items showed sparse responses. Analysis supported an eight-item unidimensional model based on bother and impacts. No items performed differently by gender or continence status. The OAB-BAT showed internal consistency (ω=0.918), retest reliability (two-way random intraclass correlation coefficient=0.81), and convergent validity with the OAB-q (r>0.4). Known groups showed the expected trend. Comparisons between OAB-BAT scores and components of the bladder diary showed a moderate effect size (r>0.4). CONCLUSIONS: The eight-item OAB-BAT with 7-d recall is valid and reliable as an OAB PRO measure. Structural modeling, balanced with content validity considerations, produced robust scores. The OAB-BAT is a useful addition to the clinical assessment of patients, designed to complement the use of bladder diaries for monitoring OAB outcomes, in clinical trial and clinical practice environments. Future studies will need to assess the treatment satisfaction items in a larger sample of patients receiving OAB treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested a questionnaire designed to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, bother, satisfaction, and impacts by asking patients to complete it on a weekly basis. We found that the questionnaire accurately captures the symptoms and impacts that are most important to patients with OAB. We conclude that the questionnaire could be a useful instrument and, after further assessment in clinical practice and research, a possible alternative to a bladder diary in measuring OAB outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK.

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of solifenacin 5 mg/day versus other oral antimuscarinic agents used for overactive bladder (OAB) from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Study design: In a Markov model, hypothetical patients received solifenacin 5 mg/day or a comparator antimuscarinic, after which they could switch to an alternative antimuscarinic. The model estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over a 5-year period. Results: Solifenacin 5 mg/day was the dominant treatment strategy (i.e., less costly and more effective) versus tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg/day, fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg/day, oxybutynin ER 10 mg/day and solifenacin 10 mg/day, and was cost-effective (i.e., ICERs below the £30,000 per QALY threshold generally applied in the NHS) versus oxybutynin immediate release (IR) 10 mg/day, tolterodine IR 4 mg/day and trospium chloride 60 mg/day. The probability of solifenacin 5 mg/day being dominant/cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per QALY was 57-98%. Conclusions: Solifenacin 5 mg/day appears to be a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of OAB over a 5-year timeframe compared with other oral antimuscarinic agents in the UK. These findings are important for decision-makers considering the economic implications of selecting treatments for OAB.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Monotherapy or Combination Therapies for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron is an established treatment alternative to antimuscarinic therapy for patients with overactive bladder (OAB), as shown by efficacy and tolerability data from phase III trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron 50mg versus antimuscarinic monotherapies and combination therapies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2000-2017) assessing eligible treatments for OAB. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Efficacy assessments included micturition frequency, urgency urinary incontinence, dry rate, and 50% reduction in incontinence. Tolerability assessments included dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, and hypertension. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 64 studies (n=46 666) were included in the network meta-analysis. Mirabegron 50mg was significantly more efficacious than placebo for all efficacy endpoints. Comparable overall efficacy was observed for mirabegron 50mg versus most active treatments, but solifenacin 10mg monotherapy and solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg in combination were more efficacious for some/all outcomes. Mirabegron 50mg was significantly better tolerated regarding dry mouth, constipation, and urinary retention than 21/22, 9/20, and 7/10 active comparators, respectively; similar overall tolerability was observed between mirabegron 50mg and all treatments (including placebo) for the remaining endpoints. Limitations of the study included between-trial variations in the definition of certain endpoints and heterogeneity of the available data (eg, number of studies and patients assessed) for comparator treatments across different endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The relief of key OAB symptoms produced by mirabegron 50mg is significantly better than placebo, and similar to a range of common antimuscarinics, with the benefit of significantly fewer bothersome anticholinergic side effects such as dry mouth. Combination treatment of solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg appears to provide an efficacy benefit compared with mirabegron 50mg, with the expected side effects of individual antimuscarinics. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different drug treatments for OAB. Mirabegron 50mg was as effective as antimuscarinic therapy, with fewer common, bothersome side effects such as dry mouth, constipation, and urinary retention. Combination treatment of solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg was more effective than mirabegron 50mg alone, but with more anticholinergic side effects.

Development of an overactive bladder assessment tool (BAT): A potential improvement to the standard bladder diary.

AIMS: To develop a comprehensive patient-reported bladder assessment tool (BAT) for assessing overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: Subjects were consented and eligibility was confirmed by a recruiting physician; subjects were then scheduled for in-person interviews. For concept elicitation and cognitive interviews, 30 and 20 subjects, respectively, were targeted for recruitment from US sites. All interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using a qualitative data analysis software program. A draft BAT was created based on the results of the concept elicitation interviews and further revised based on cognitive interviews as well as feedback from an advisory board of clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) experts. RESULTS: Nocturia, daytime frequency, and urgency were reported by all subjects (n = 30, 100.0%), and incontinence was reported by most subjects (n = 25, 83.3%). The most frequently reported impacts were waking up to urinate (n = 30, 100.0%), embarrassment/shame (n = 24, 80.0%), stress/anxiety (n = 23, 76.7%), and lack of control (n = 23, 76.7%). Following analysis, item generation, cognitive interviews, and advisory board feedback, the resulting BAT contains four hypothesized domains (symptom frequency, symptom bother, impacts, and satisfaction with treatment) and 17 items with a 7-day recall period. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT has been developed in multiple stages with input from both OAB patients and clinical experts following the recommended processes included in the FDA PRO Guidance for Industry. Once fully validated, we believe it will offer a superior alternative to use of the bladder diary and other PROs for monitoring OAB patients in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Patient-reported outcomes from SYNERGY, a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluating combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in OAB patients.

AIMS: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of combinations of solifenacin and mirabegron compared with solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapy and with placebo in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from the SYNERGY trial. METHODS: Following a 4-week placebo run-in, period patients (≥18 years) with OAB were randomized 2:2:1:1:1:1 to receive solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg (combination 5 + 25 mg), solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg, (combination 5 + 50 mg), solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron 25 mg, mirabegron 50 mg or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout period. At each visit, PROs related to quality of life, symptom bother, and treatment satisfaction were assessed, including OAB-q Symptom Bother score, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) Total score, treatment satisfaction-visual analogue scale (TS-VAS), and patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 3527 patients were randomized into the study, with 3494 receiving double-blind treatment. At end of treatment (EoT), both combination groups showed greater improvements in OAB-q Symptom Bother score compared with the monotherapy groups (nominal P < 0.001). Statistically significant improvements in HRQOL Total scores were observed in the combination groups versus monotherapy groups (P ≤ 0.002). For both combination groups, the OAB-q Symptom Bother score responder rates at EoT were statistically significantly higher versus mirabegron monotherapy (P < 0.05). The mean adjusted changes from baseline to EoT for PPBC were greater in the combination groups compared with monotherapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: PROs showed that combination therapy provided clear improvements and an additive effect for many HRQOL parameters, including OAB-q Symptom Bother score, HRQOL Total score, and PPBC.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin 5 mg/day versus other oral antimuscarinic agents in overactive bladder: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

AIMS: To compare efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin 5 mg/day versus other oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials in OAB (2000-2015) for antimuscarinic agents. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate efficacy and tolerability outcomes for solifenacin 5 mg/day relative to other antimuscarinics. RESULTS: The NMA included 53 eligible trials (published, n = 48; unpublished on search date, n = 5). Solifenacin 5 mg/day was significantly more effective than tolterodine 4 mg/day for reducing incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes, but significantly less effective than solifenacin 10 mg/day for micturition; no other statistically significant differences were noted for efficacy. Solifenacin 5 mg/day had a statistically significant lower risk of dry mouth compared with darifenacin 15 mg/day, fesoterodine 8 mg/day, oxybutynin extended-release 10 mg/day, oxybutynin immediate-release (IR) 9-15 mg/day, tolterodine IR 4 mg/day, propiverine 20 mg/day, and solifenacin 10 mg/day. There were no significant differences between solifenacin 5 mg/day and other antimuscarinics for risk of blurred vision, or for 11 of 17 active comparators for risk of constipation. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA suggests that the efficacy of solifenacin 5 mg/day is at least similar to other common antimuscarinics across the spectrum of OAB symptoms analyzed, and is more effective than tolterodine 4 mg/day in reducing incontinence and UUI episodes. Solifenacin 5 mg/day has a lower risk of dry mouth compared with several agents.

A Narrative Review of Patient-reported Outcomes in Overactive Bladder: What is the Way of the Future?

CONTEXT: Debate exists on overactive bladder (OAB) treatment-response assessment in clinical trials and the nature and shortcomings of the different endpoints used in OAB clinical research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence and tools that measure OAB treatment response in clinical trials and to inform the development of a new multidimensional patient-reported outcome (PRO) that could be used as a primary endpoint in OAB trials. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a narrative review of OAB literature available in the PubMed database published between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2015. Eighty articles were selected for full text review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The assessment of treatment outcomes in OAB is challenging due to the heterogeneity of symptoms and reliance on PROs. OAB studies report a high level of placebo effect and the placebo response is poorly understood. We found significant correlations between PRO measures and bladder diaries. There is evidence of several issues with the bladder diary: burden, over/underestimation, recall period, and lack of validation. Trials for other conditions-interstitial cystitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, headache, and restless legs syndrome-have used symptom scales rather than diaries to measure treatment outcomes and some now incorporate PRO measures as primary, coprimary, and secondary endpoints. The International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society recommends evaluation of satisfaction, symptoms, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence of the shortcomings in current approaches to measuring OAB outcomes in clinical trials and recognition that a new simpler approach which incorporates symptom and health-related quality of life assessment could provide a more comprehensive, standardized approach to OAB assessment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Overactive bladder is a urinary syndrome. Individuals experience different symptoms to varying degrees, which poses difficulties in accurately measuring the effect of treatment. This review found evidence and recommendations that propose a simpler but more comprehensive way to measure treatment outcomes.

Oral pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder in older patients: mirabegron as a potential alternative to antimuscarinics.

OBJECTIVE: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a particular challenge to treat in older adults with co-morbid conditions taking multiple medications. Antimuscarinics (e.g., solifenacin, fesoterodine) and ß3-adrenergic receptor agonists (mirabegron) are similarly efficacious; however, antimuscarinics may be associated with side effects that result in poor persistence and contribute to anticholinergic burden, particularly in those taking other medications with anticholinergic properties. With a mechanism of action distinct from antimuscarinics, mirabegron has a different tolerability profile and does not contribute to anticholinergic burden. The objective of this review was to compare and contrast the tolerability profiles of antimuscarinics and mirabegron in older patients to inform practice. METHODS: Prospective trials or retrospective subgroup analyses of antimuscarinics for the treatment of OAB in older patients were identified through a search of PubMed. Tolerability data and results of subgroup analyses of mirabegron in patients aged ≥65 and ≥75 years from a pooled analysis of three trials each of 12 weeks and a 1 year trial are described. RESULTS: Anticholinergic adverse events (AEs) including dry mouth and constipation were more frequent with antimuscarinics versus mirabegron. In patients aged ≥65 years, dry mouth occurred with a six-fold higher incidence with tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg than with mirabegron 25 mg or 50 mg over 12 weeks, and a three-fold higher incidence with tolterodine ER than mirabegron 50 mg over 1 year. Mirabegron had a low incidence of central nervous system effects. A systematic review of the cardiovascular safety profile of mirabegron has not identified any clinically significant effects on blood pressure or pulse rate at therapeutic doses amongst patients aged ≥65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron has a more favorable tolerability profile than antimuscarinics amongst older patients and may provide an improved benefit-to-risk ratio and therefore be considered as an alternative to antimuscarinics for older patients.

Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: efficacy and safety results from a randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 study (Symphony).

BACKGROUND: Combining the ß3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron and the antimuscarinic (AM) agent solifenacin may improve efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) while reducing the AM side effects. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of combinations of solifenacin/mirabegron compared with solifenacin 5mg monotherapy. The secondary objective was to explore the dose-response relationship and the safety/tolerability compared with placebo and monotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 2, factorial design, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled trial, conducted at 141 sites in 20 European countries. Male and female patients were aged ≥18 yr with symptoms of OAB for ≥3 mo. INTERVENTION: A total of 1306 patients (66.4% female) were randomised to 12 wk of treatment in 1 of 12 groups: 6 combination groups (solifenacin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50 mg), 5 monotherapy groups (solifenacin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg, or mirabegron 25 or 50 mg), or placebo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Change from baseline to end of treatment in mean volume voided per micturition (MVV) (primary end point) and mean numbers of micturitions per 24 h, incontinence episodes per 24 h, and urgency episodes per 24 h were analysed using an analysis of covariance model. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), blood pressure, pulse rate, postvoid residual (PVR) volume, and laboratory and electrocardiography (ECG) parameters. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy, all combinations with solifenacin 5 or 10 mg significantly improved MVV, with adjusted differences ranging from 18.0 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-30.0) to 26.3 ml (95% CI, 12.0-41.0). Three combination groups significantly reduced micturition frequency compared with solifenacin 5 mg, ranging from -0.80 (95% CI, -1.39 to -0.22) to -0.98 (95% CI, -1.68 to -0.27). Five of six combinations significantly reduced urgency episodes compared with solifenacin 5 mg, ranging from -0.98 (95% CI, -1.78, to -0.18) to -1.37 (95% CI, -2.03 to -0.70). No dose-related trends in TEAEs, blood pressure, pulse rate, PVR volume, or laboratory or ECG parameters were observed between combination and monotherapy groups, although the incidence of constipation was slightly increased with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with solifenacin/mirabegron significantly improved MVV, micturition frequency, and urgency compared with solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy. All combinations were well tolerated, with no important additional safety findings compared with monotherapy or placebo. PATIENT SUMMARY: To improve treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), mirabegron/solifenacin in combination was compared with each drug alone and placebo. Combination therapy improved OAB symptoms and had similar safety and acceptability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov: NCT01340027.

Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

AIM: To report the effects of radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing techniques on lower urinary tract function in women. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Medline using the keywords bladder after radical hysterectomy, nerve sparing radical hysterectomy, and urinary dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Significant results and citations were reviewed manually by the authors. RESULTS: The sympathetic and parasympathetic systems innervating the lower urinary tract may be disrupted due to resection of uterosacral and rectovaginal ligaments, the dorsal and lateral paracervix, the caudal part of the vesico-uterine ligaments, and the vagina. This supports the neurogenic etiology of early and late bladder dysfunction after radical surgery. Bladder disorders are also related to the extent of radical surgery. The neuropathopysiology of lower urinary tract symptoms after radical hysterectomy is not fully understood. Recent data have highlighted the role of urethral sphincter pressure in the etiology of postoperative incontinence. Various surgical approaches have been developed to preserve autonomic pelvic innervation. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve-sparing techniques appear to improve bladder function without compromising overall survival. Studies comparing the effects of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with standard surgery yielded encouraging results in respect of postoperative lower urinary tract function. Clinical trials with a long period of follow-up are required for better comprehension of the complex pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy.

Clinical value of a patient-reported goal-attainment measure: the global development of self-assessment goal achievement (SAGA) questionnaire for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.

AIMS: To discuss the importance of patients' treatment goals and perceived goal attainment to better address expectations in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: The development of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire was driven by measurement principles from the field of qualitative and psychometric research adapted to elicit patients' treatment goals. At baseline, SAGA solicits individualized responses of patient's treatment expectations and goals, and at follow-up SAGA uses a goal-attainment scale (GAS) to document goal achievement. RESULTS: The SAGA questionnaire provides a basis for the patient and physician to discuss realistic treatment expectations and to measure the alignment between patients' expectations and treatment outcomes in terms of improvement in symptoms and impact on function. Therefore, incorporating the SAGA questionnaire into clinical trials may provide an additional dimension of treatment efficacy by incorporating data on treatment satisfaction from the patient's perspective. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGA questionnaire is a useful tool for patient-centered discussions about the treatment and management of LUTS, including OAB, and assisting physicians in tracking progress and managing patient expectations during therapy.

Efficacy of fesoterodine compared with extended-release tolterodine in men and women with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of fesoterodine 8 mg vs extended-release (ER) tolterodine 4 mg for overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in terms of patient-reported outcomes in women and in men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pooled data from two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies were analysed. Participants eligible for the studies were ≥18 years old, had self-reported OAB symptoms for ≥3 months in 3-day baseline diaries and had ≥8 micturitions and ≥1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode per 24 h. Individuals were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week then 8 mg for 11 weeks), ER tolterodine (4 mg), or placebo. Changes from baseline in 3-day bladder diary variables and scores from the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), were assessed, as was the 'diary-dry' rate (the proportion of subjects with >0 UUI episodes according to baseline diary and no UUI episodes according to post-baseline diary). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes. RESULTS: At week 12, women showed significantly greater improvement with fesoterodine 8 mg (n = 1374) than with ER tolterodine 4 mg (n = 1382) and placebo (n = 679) in UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturition frequency, urgency episodes, and all other diary endpoints (except nocturnal micturitions versus ER tolterodine), and also in scores on the PPBC, UPS, and all OAB-q scales and domains (all P < 0.005). Diary-dry rates in women were significantly greater with fesoterodine (63%) than with tolterodine (57%; P = 0.002) or placebo (48%; P < 0.0001). In men, there were no significant differences in improvement in UUI episodes between any treatment groups at week 12. Improvements in men were significantly greater with fesoterodine 8 mg (n = 265) than with ER tolterodine (n = 275) for severe urgency and the OAB-q Symptom Bother domain and were also significantly greater with fesoterodine than with placebo (n = 133) for micturition frequency, urgency episodes, severe urgency episodes, PPBC responses and scores on all OAB-q scales and domains at week 12 (all P < 0.04). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events in both genders were dry mouth (women: fesoterodine, 29%; ER tolterodine, 15%; placebo, 6%; men: fesoterodine, 21%; ER tolterodine, 13%; placebo, 5%) and constipation (women: fesoterodine, 5%; ER tolterodine, 4%; placebo, 2%; men: fesoterodine, 5%; ER tolterodine, 3%; placebo, 1%). Urinary retention rates were low in women (fesoterodine, <1%; ER tolterodine, <1%; placebo, 0%) and men (fesoterodine, 2%; ER tolterodine <1%; placebo, 2%). CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over ER tolterodine 4 mg on diary endpoints, including UUI, symptom bother and health-related quality of life in women. In men, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to ER tolterodine 4 mg for improving severe urgency and symptom bother.

European content validation of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire in patients with overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire is a patient-completed instrument designed to assess goal attainment in the behavioral or pharmacologic treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including overactive bladder (OAB). The SAGA questionnaire allows patients to identify and rank the importance of treatment goals before treatment is initiated; the follow-up SAGA questionnaire quantifies the achievement of these patient-identified goals. The objective of this qualitative research was to confirm the content validity of the German, Spanish, Swedish, and English (UK) language versions of the SAGA questionnaire in patients with OAB with or without other LUTS. METHODS: The SAGA questionnaire was translated to each language in accordance with a well-established forward and backward harmonization method. Patient interviews were then conducted according to a cognitive debriefing methodology. Qualitative analysis of patients' input allowed assessment of content validity of each linguistically adapted SAGA questionnaire. RESULTS: All patients (n = 29; six to eight per targeted country) found the SAGA questionnaire easy to understand and to complete. Most patients completed the nine prespecified (fixed) treatment goals and were able to add up to five personal goals in the open-ended portion and rate each goal by importance. Differences were identified in how the various languages communicated some of the concepts assessed with the SAGA questionnaire. Rewording of the translated versions of the questionnaire was necessary in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: This linguistic content validation study in four European languages indicates that SAGA is a comprehensive, easy-to-understand, and relevant questionnaire for patient-completed evaluation of LUTS/OAB symptoms and treatment goal attainment.

Effects of drug cessation after flexible-dose fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the course of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms after 4 weeks of no treatment following a 12-week study of the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose fesoterodine in patients with OAB who were enrolled in the UK healthcare system. There are limited data available on the natural time course of OAB symptoms after the cessation of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the open-label UK Study Assessing Flexible-dose Fesoterodine in Adults trial, patients aged ≥18 years with self-reported OAB symptoms for ≥3 months, a mean of at least eight micturitions per 24 h and three or more urgency episodes per 24 h on a 3-day bladder diary at baseline, and at least moderate bladder-related problems reported on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at baseline, were treated with fesoterodine for 12 weeks. All patients received fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for the first 4 weeks, at which time they could choose to increase the dose to 8 mg once daily, based on a discussion of treatment efficacy and tolerability with the investigator, or they could remain on fesoterodine 4 mg for the remaining 8 weeks. The 12-week treatment period was followed by a 4-week follow-up period of no fesoterodine treatment. Patients completed 3-day bladder diaries and the PPBC at baseline, week 4, end of treatment (week 12) and end of the follow-up period (week 16); the King's Health Questionnaire at baseline, end of treatment (week 12) and end of the follow-up period (week 16); and the Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue questionnaire at week 12. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of fesoterodine treatment, patients had clinically meaningful improvements in bladder diary variables and King's Health Questionnaire domains; 79% (254/322) of patients reported an improvement on the PPBC. After 4 weeks of no treatment, most patients deteriorated back to week 4 levels or worse on all bladder diary and patient-reported outcomes. Patients who expressed a benefit from fesoterodine treatment, satisfaction with their treatment or a willingness to continue treatment showed greater improvement from baseline to week 12 and greater deterioration from week 12 to week 16 than patients who did not respond positively on the Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue questionnaire. Both men and women showed a meaningful deterioration in bladder diary variables and patient-reported outcomes at week 16; baseline symptom severity, age and week 4 dose escalation status did not appear to affect outcome deterioration at week 16. CONCLUSIONS: At 4 weeks after fesoterodine was discontinued, patients showed an increase in the frequency of OAB symptoms, an increase in the severity of bladder-related problems and a reduction in health-related quality of life. Many patients with OAB who respond to antimuscarinics may require treatment for more than 12 weeks because symptoms recur as early as 4 weeks after the cessation of therapy.

What are the best outcome measures when assessing treatments for LUTD?--achieving the most out of outcome evaluation: ICI-RS 2011.

A think tank was convened at the third ICI-RS meeting held in the UK, June 2011, to consider the best outcome measures when assessing treatments for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Given the vast array of measures available a focus on questionnaires was decided upon, which continued to highlight a plethora of available tools. The decision was therefore taken to approach this topic from an alternative perspective and instead ask the audience of gathered experts in this field to consider, "What we need to ask as a minimum in order to capture the most fundamental parameters when evaluating new treatments for LUTD?" Discussions highlighted the need for inclusion of a global measure in all outcome evaluations in order to increase comparability between different treatment evaluations and different populations. More specific categories of evaluation identified were: treatment satisfaction, symptom quantification, health related quality of life and adverse events. Further optional components were identified for inclusion where relevant, such as health economic, goal setting and psychosocial evaluation. A "Minimum Outcome Set for Testing (MOST)" was therefore proposed by selecting a health outcome measure from each category while not being prescriptive about specific outcome measurement selection. The 'MOST' toolkit is therefore proposed to promote standardized evaluation in this field and represents a useful starting point for further consideration of this concept.

Sustained improvement in patient-reported outcomes during long-term fesoterodine treatment for overactive bladder symptoms: pooled analysis of two open-label extension studies.

OBJECTIVES: • To evaluate the effects of long-term fesoterodine treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and treatment satisfaction in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. • To determine the impact of gender and age on these effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • This is a post hoc analysis of data pooled from identically designed open-label extensions of two randomized, double-blind, 12-week fesoterodine studies. • Initial treatment was once-daily fesoterodine 8 mg; subjects had the opportunity to receive open-label fesoterodine for ≥24 months. • After 1 month, subjects could elect dose reduction to 4 mg and subsequent re-escalation to 8 mg; dose reduction and re-escalation were each allowed once annually. • Changes in scores on the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and a Likert scale evaluating severity of bladder-related problems were assessed at open-label baseline and months 12 and 24; treatment satisfaction was assessed at open-label baseline and at months 4, 12 and 24. RESULTS: • A total of 864 enrolled subjects were included (men, n= 182; women, n= 682; aged <45 years, n= 134; 45-64 years, n= 432; 65-74 years, n= 204; ≥75 years, n= 94); most subjects (77%) who continued treatment maintained the 8-mg dose. • Among subjects in the overall population, there were significant improvements in all KHQ domains, ICIQ-SF scores, and bladder-related problems at open-label baseline vs double-blind baseline (P < 0.05); additional significant improvements were observed at months 12 and 24 vs open-label baseline in all outcomes (P < 0.05) except for the KHQ General Health Perception domain. • When data were stratified by gender or age, significant improvements at open-label baseline vs double-blind baseline were further significantly enhanced or sustained at months 12 and 24 for most KHQ domains, and for ICIQ-SF scores and bladder-related problems for all groups. Women had significantly greater improvements than men in the KHQ Emotion (P= 0.0173) and Severity/Coping (P= 0.0112) domains and ICIQ-SF scores (P= 0.0276) during open-label treatment. Subjects aged <45 years had significantly greater improvement in the Personal Relationships domain compared with those aged 45-64 years (P= 0.0357) and in the Sleep/Energy domain compared with all other groups (all P < 0.02). • Treatment satisfaction was high (≥92%) throughout open-label treatment regardless of gender or age. CONCLUSIONS: • Long-term fesoterodine treatment was associated with sustained improvement in measures of health-related quality of life and bladder-related problems and with high treatment satisfaction in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms. • Effects of gender and age were minimal.

Establishing the content validity of the King's Health Questionnaire in men and women with overactive bladder in the US.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) consists of the symptoms of urinary urgency (with or without urgency incontinence) and increased urinary frequency and nocturia. As OAB is defined by symptoms, the patient is the best source of information for assessing the impact of the condition on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). This assessment can be conducted through the use of valid patient-reported questionnaires, meaning the questionnaire has demonstrated content validity, among other acceptable psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content validity of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in patients with OAB in the US. METHODS: Men and women with continent or incontinent OAB were recruited from a clinical research site in the US. Participants completed the KHQ and were then asked about the instructions, items, and response options. Data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 24 participants (18 women, 6 men; mean [± SD] age 59.0 ± 11.1 years) with OAB were interviewed and provided feedback on the KHQ. Participants reported that overall, the KHQ covers the key aspects in which OAB impacts patients' daily lives. Most KHQ items and response options were acceptable and understandable to the participants; however, a few minor issues were noted. In item 3, shopping was not considered by some participants to be a household task, while shopping and cleaning were not relevant to some of the men. Two sets of items ('limit social life' and 'limit ability to see/visit friends' and 'bladder problem affect sleep' and 'feel worn out or tired') were perceived as redundant, while 'depressed' (item 12) and 'anxious or nervous' (item 13) were perceived by some participants as too intense. Some participants were unsure if the intended meaning of 'change your underclothes when they get wet' was about changing wet underwear or frequency of incontinence episodes. CONCLUSION: The KHQ demonstrated content validity and can be considered a relevant and appropriate tool to assess the impact of OAB on HR-QOL in men and women in the US.

Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire was developed to identify treatment goals and assess goal-achievement in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS: This study consisted of (1) gathering information on goal setting/attainment concepts, (2) goal elicitation (n = 41 patients with LUTS), (3) cognitive debriefing of draft questionnaire (n = 11), and (4) pilot testing (n = 104). RESULTS: SAGA consists of baseline (goal-assessment; ranking) and follow-up (goal-achievement) modules. In addition to goals most frequently mentioned, patients can list up to five open goals. Goals most commonly reported as "very important" in pilot testing included reducing urgency (72%), incontinence (65%), and nocturia (64%). Treatment goals spontaneously reported as "very important" were reducing incontinence (45%), nocturia (40%), and frequency (26%). CONCLUSIONS: SAGA may be used to identify treatment goals and assess goal-achievement in patients with LUTS in the clinic and for research (with additional validation). This information may promote patient-physician interaction and help patients establish realistic treatment goals, which may in turn improve treatment adherence and outcomes.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in men and women with overactive bladder symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine for men and women with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data pooled from two open-label extensions (NCT00220402, NCT00220376) of double-blind studies. All subjects began open-label treatment with fesoterodine 8 mg once daily, with voluntary dose reduction to 4 mg and re-escalation to 8 mg each permitted once annually. Maximum allowable duration of open-label treatment ranged from 24 to 36 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and discontinuations were assessed throughout treatment; subject-reported treatment tolerability and 3-day bladder diaries were evaluated at open-label baseline and months 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24. RESULTS: A total of 185 men and 705 women enrolled; 83 men (45%) and 356 women (50%) continued open-label treatment for ≥ 24 months. Most men (84%) and women (75%) remained on fesoterodine 8 mg throughout open-label treatment. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. Dry mouth was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (men, 24%; women, 32%), rates of discontinuation due to dry mouth were low (men, 1%; women, 2%). Most men and women (≥ 91%) reported at least 'good' tolerance. For men and women, statistically significant improvements in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, micturitions, urgency episodes, and mean voided volume per micturition achieved between double-blind baseline and open-label baseline were sustained or further improved through month 24; significant improvements in most OAB symptoms were observed between double-blind baseline and month 24 when subjects were stratified by double-blind treatment (placebo, tolterodine extended release 4 mg, fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg). Limitations include the lack of a placebo control and that subjects completing double-blind treatment may have been more likely to tolerate or respond to long-term fesoterodine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term fesoterodine treatment was well tolerated and associated with sustained improvements in OAB symptoms in men and women.

Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: a retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE: Benefits attributed to waterbirth (WB) include a shorter second stage of labour and reduction of perineal trauma. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of perineal trauma and pelvic floor function following WB compared to land birth (LB). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis on the incidence of perineal trauma following a spontaneous WB (n=160) or a LB (n=623). Data were collected using the hospital's healthcare database, which codes information on pregnancy outcomes and related variables. ICIQ-VS for vaginal symptoms, and the ICIQ-KH Long Form (KHQ) were used to assess pelvic floor function a year after delivery. RESULTS: Length of 2nd stage was significantly shorter in the WB group. Although this did not translate into less perineal trauma, the incidence of 3rd degree tears appeared to be doubled in the WB group. 77 (38.5%) women from the WB group and 54 (22%) from the LB group answered the postal questionnaires. A significant number of women reported vaginal and urinary symptoms, however the difference between both groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Waterbirth results in a shorter 2nd stage of labour. This does not lead to less overall perineal trauma or better pelvic floor performance postpartum. Physical limitations in protecting the perineum during the expulsion phase may be associated with an increase in the incidence of 3rd degree tears in the WB population.