Porphyrins are not present in feline ocular tissues or corneal sequestra.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if feline lacrimal glands, glands of the third eyelid, corneas, and corneal sequestra contain porphyrins, which could be responsible for the brown/amber discoloration of corneal sequestra and tears in affected cats. PROCEDURES: Samples of grossly normal cornea, lacrimal gland, gland of the third eyelid, and sequestra obtained via keratectomy were collected. Porphyrin concentrations of the homogenate were determined by spectrofluorometry with protoporphyrin IX and coproporphyrin III dihydrochloride used as standards. A hamster harderian gland was used as a positive control. RESULTS: Normal tissues were harvested from one eye each of 14 nonclient owned, adult, mixed-breed, short-hair cats euthanized for reasons not associated with this study. Eighteen sequestra were acquired from cats undergoing unilateral lamellar keratectomies. Breeds of the affected cats included eight Himalayan, five domestic shorthair, and one each of four other breeds. Only the positive control and standards contained levels of porphyrins above background. All feline samples examined were histologically normal with no evidence of porphyrins. CONCLUSIONS: Porphyrins are absent in normal feline lacrimal glands, corneas, and corneal sequestra. Porphyrins do not appear to be the cause of the brown/amber color of feline corneal sequestra.

Shope fibroma virus keratitis and spontaneous cataracts in a domestic rabbit.

A 7-year-old domestic rabbit presented for an enlarging ventral perilimbal mass OS. Keratectomy was performed to remove the mass. A diagnosis of Shope fibroma virus keratitis was confirmed based on signalment, clinical signs, histologic evaluation and virus isolation. Progression of bilateral cataracts leading to visual deficits was addressed with phacoemulsification. The rabbit remained visual and comfortable 5 months postoperatively and free of recurrence of the limbal mass 9 months after initial presentation.

Evaluation of canine serum for the presence of antiretinal autoantibodies in sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of serum antiretinal antibodies in sudden acquired retinal degeneration syndrome (SARDS) affected dogs and the size of the antigen to which these antibodies bind via the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot immunoassays. ANIMALS STUDIED: Serum was collected from 13 dogs affected by SARDS and five dogs with normal ocular examinations. PROCEDURES: All serum samples were subjected to ELISA with saline-soluble canine retinal tissue and Western blot analyses with SDS solubilized normal canine retinal tissue as the antigen. Antirecoverin (23 kDa) and antiheat shock cognate (65 kDa) antibodies were used as positive controls for both procedures. Affinity-purified goat antidog IgG and IgM labeled with horseradish peroxidase were used for all clinical samples and goat antirabbit IgG was used as the secondary antibody for the positive controls. RESULTS: ELISA demonstrated antibody reaction with all samples. Western blot immunoassays identified multiple bands in all canine serum samples, as well as in negative controls. Approximate sizes of the bands were 25 and 50 kDa, corresponding to IgG light and heavy chains, respectively. CONCLUSION: No antiretinal autoantibodies were identified in the serum of dogs affected by SARDS as compared to normal canine patients.

Detection of neoplastic lymphocytes in peripheral blood of dogs with lymphoma by polymerase chain reaction for antigen receptor gene rearrangement.

BACKGROUND: Uniquely rearranged immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene sequences can be amplified and electrophoretically separated by size to detect a clonal population of lymphocytes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detects neoplastic (clonal) lymphocytes more frequently than do microscopic methods. METHODS: We identified neoplastic lymphocytes in peripheral blood by both routine and standardized microscopic examination of blood smears and by PCR amplification of blood-derived DNA and compared the 3 methods for frequency of detection of leukemic involvement. For standardized microscopic examination (200 leukocytes counted on Wright-Giemsa-stained blood smears), samples were categorized as negative (1% prolymphocytes, no lymphoblasts), or positive (>/=1 lymphoblast). A PCR-amplified sample was positive if 1 or 2 discrete bands were seen on the gel, or negative if no bands, a smear, or a faint ladder was seen. RESULTS: Using PCR, neoplastic lymphocytes were detected in peripheral blood 2.5 times more frequently than with routine or standardized microscopic evaluation. Eighty-three percent of samples negative by microscopy were positive by PCR. CONCLUSION: PCR is more sensitive than microscopy for the detection of clonal lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The results of this study also suggest that neoplastic lymphocytes circulate in peripheral blood at a higher frequency than previously reported. PCR may be useful for detecting or phenotyping lymphoma, monitoring response to therapy, identifying recurrence, and screening breeds at risk.