Interaction of neurochondrin with the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 interferes with G protein-coupled signal transduction but not agonist-mediated internalization.

Screening of a human brain cDNA library using the C-terminal tail of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) as bait in a yeast two-hybrid assay resulted in the identification of the neurite-outgrowth related factor, neurochondrin. This interaction was verified in overlay, pulldown, and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Deletion mapping confined the binding to the C terminus of neurochondrin and to the proximal C terminus of MCHR1, a region known to be involved in G protein binding and signal transduction. This region of the MCHR1 is also able to interact with the actin- and intermediate filament-binding protein, periplakin. Interactions of MCHR1 with neurochondrin and periplakin were competitive, indicating that these two proteins bind to overlapping regions of MCHR1. Although neurochondrin did not interfere with melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated internalization of the receptor, it did inhibit G protein-coupled signal transduction via both Galpha(i/o) and Galpha(q/11) family G proteins as measured by each of melanin-concentrating hormone-induced G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel activity of voltage-clamped amphibian oocytes, by calcium mobilization in transfected mammalian cells, and by reduction in the capacity of melanin-concentrating hormone to promote binding of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate to both Galpha(o1) and Galpha(11). Immunohistochemistry revealed co-expression of neurochondrin and MCHR1 within the rodent brain, suggesting that neurochondrin may be involved in the regulation of MCHR1 signaling and play a role in modulating melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated functions in vivo.

Carvedilol-induced antagonism of angiotensin II: a matter of alpha1-adrenoceptor blockade.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether renin-angiotensin system blockade might underlie the favorable metabolic effects of the nonselective beta + alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker carvedilol as compared with the selective beta1-adrenoceptor blocker metoprolol. METHODS: Human coronary microarteries (HCMAs), obtained from 32 heart valve donors, were mounted in myographs. RESULTS: Angiotensin II and the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine constricted HCMAs to maximally 63 +/- 10 and 46 +/- 15% of the contraction to 100 mmol/l K. Neither carvedilol, metoprolol, the nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol, nor the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin affected the constrictor response to angiotensin II. alpha1-adrenoreceptors and beta-adrenoceptors are thus not involved in the direct constrictor effects of angiotensin II. When added to the organ bath at a subthreshold concentration, angiotensin II greatly amplified the response to phenylephrine. Both carvedilol and the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist irbesartan inhibited this angiotensin II-induced potentiation. Furthermore, carvedilol blocked the angiotensin II-induced amplification of phenylephrine-induced inositol phosphate accumulation in cardiomyocytes. CONCLUSIONS: AT1-alpha1-receptor crosstalk, involving inositol phosphates, sensitizes HCMAs to alpha1-adrenoceptor agonists. Our results suggest that, in the presence of an increased sympathetic tone, carvedilol provides AT1 receptor blockade via its alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking effects. This could explain the favorable effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol.

Up-regulation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor by the MAS proto-oncogene is due to constitutive activation of Gq/G11 by MAS.

Coexpression of the MAS proto-oncogene with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor in CHO-K1 cells has been reported to increase the number of [(3)H]angiotensin II-binding sites, although MAS does not bind [(3)H]angiotensin II. In HEK293 cells stably expressing AT(1) receptor-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), MAS-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) expression from an inducible locus caused strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts and [(3)H]angiotensin II binding levels. The time course of AT(1) receptor-CFP up-regulation was also markedly slower than that of induction of MAS expression. These effects were not mimicked by induced expression of I138D MAS-YFP, a mutant unable to cause constitutive loading of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) onto the phospholipase Cbeta-linked G protein Galpha(11). Protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors and the selective Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) inhibitor YM-254890 fully blocked MAS-induced up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts, whereas the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate produced strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP without induction of MAS-YFP expression and in the presence of I138D MAS-YFP. The C-terminal tail of the AT(1) receptor is a known target for PKC-mediated phosphorylation. In cells stably expressing a C-terminally truncated version of the AT receptor, induction of MAS expression did not up-regulate the truncated construct levels. These data demonstrate that the ability of MAS to up-regulate AT(1) receptor levels reflects the constitutive capacity of MAS to activate Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) and hence stimulate PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the AT(1) receptor.

G-protein-coupled receptor Mas is a physiological antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas, encoded by the Mas proto-oncogene, as an endogenous receptor for the heptapeptide angiotensin-(1-7); however, the receptor is also suggested to be involved in actions of angiotensin II. We therefore tested whether this could be mediated indirectly through an interaction with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, AT1. METHODS AND RESULTS: In transfected mammalian cells, Mas was not activated by angiotensin II; however, AT1 receptor-mediated, angiotensin II-induced production of inositol phosphates and mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ was diminished by 50% after coexpression of Mas, despite a concomitant increase in angiotensin II binding capacity. Mas and the AT1 receptor formed a constitutive hetero-oligomeric complex that was unaffected by the presence of agonists or antagonists of the 2 receptors. In vivo, Mas acts as an antagonist of the AT1 receptor; mice lacking the Mas gene show enhanced angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in mesenteric microvessels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Mas can hetero-oligomerize with the AT1 receptor and by so doing inhibit the actions of angiotensin II. This is a novel demonstration that a G-protein-coupled receptor acts as a physiological antagonist of a previously characterized receptor. Consequently, the AT1-Mas complex could be of great importance as a target for pharmacological intervention in cardiovascular diseases.

Selective interactions between helix VIII of the human mu-opioid receptors and the C terminus of periplakin disrupt G protein activation.

Analysis of interactions between the C-terminal tail of the MOP-1 and MOP-1A variants of the human mu-opioid receptor with proteins derived from a human brain cDNA library resulted in identification of the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin. Mapping of this interaction indicated that the predicted fourth intracellular loop/helix VIII of the receptor interacts with the C-terminal rod and linker region of periplakin. Periplakin is widely expressed in the central nervous system of both man and rat and demonstrated an overlapping but not identical distribution with mu-opioid (MOP) receptors. Co-expression of periplakin with MOP-1 or a MOP-1-eYFP fusion construct in HEK293 cells did not interfere with agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor. When co-expressed with a MOP-1-Gi1 alpha fusion protein periplakin significantly reduced the capacity of the agonist to stimulate binding of 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) to the receptor-associated G protein. By contrast, periplakin did not interfere with agonist-stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to either an alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor-Gi1 alpha fusion protein or a beta2-adrenoreceptor-Gs alpha fusion protein, indicating its selectivity of function. This represents the first example of an opioid receptor-interacting protein that functions to disrupt agonist-mediated G protein activation.

Enhanced detection of receptor constitutive activity in the presence of regulators of G protein signaling: applications to the detection and analysis of inverse agonists and low-efficacy partial agonists.

Fusion proteins between the human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor and either wild type or certain pertussis toxin-resistant forms of G(o1)alpha and G(i1)alpha display constitutive GTPase activity that can be inhibited by the inverse agonist spiperone. Addition of recombinant regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 1 or RGS16 to membranes expressing these fusion proteins resulted in elevation of this constitutive GTPase activity without significantly altering the binding affinity of antagonist/inverse agonist ligands. For a 5-HT(1A) receptor-(Cys(351)Ile)G(o1)alpha fusion protein the increase in basal GTPase activity was greater than 4-fold. Enzyme kinetic analysis demonstrated that the effect of RGS1 was as a GTPase-activating protein for the fusion construct. In the presence of the RGS proteins, both agonists and inverse agonists produced much more robust regulation of high-affinity GTPase activity than in their absence. This allowed detection of the partial agonist nature of WAY100635, which has been described previously as a neutral antagonist at the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Of a range of ligands studied, only haloperidol functioned as a neutral ligand in the presence of RGS1. These studies show that addition of a recombinant RGS protein provides a simple and novel means to elevate the fraction of basal membrane GTPase activity contributed by the constitutive activity of a receptor. By so doing, it also greatly enhances the ability to detect and analyze the effects of inverse agonists and to discriminate between neutral ligands and those with low levels of positive intrinsic efficacy.

Homo- and hetero-oligomeric interactions between G-protein-coupled receptors in living cells monitored by two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET): hetero-oligomers between receptor subtypes form more efficiently than between less closely related sequences.

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were examined in HEK-293 cells using two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). BRET(2) (a variant of BRET) offers greatly improved separation of the emission spectra of the donor and acceptor moieties compared with traditional BRET. Previously recorded homo-oligomerization of the human delta-opioid receptor was confirmed using BRET(2). Homo-oligomerization of the kappa-opioid receptor was observed using both BRET techniques. Both homo- and hetero-oligomers, containing both delta- and kappa-opioid receptors, were unaffected by the presence of receptor ligands. BRET detection of opioid receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers required expression of 50,000-100,000 copies of the receptor energy acceptor construct per cell. The effectiveness of delta-kappa-opioid receptor hetero-oligomer formation was as great as for homomeric interactions. The capacity of the two opioid receptors to form oligomeric complexes with the beta(2)-adrenoceptor was also assessed. Although such interactions were detected, at least 250,000 copies per cell of the energy acceptor were required. Requirement for high levels of receptor expression was equally pronounced in attempts to measure hetero-oligomer formation between the kappa-opioid receptor and the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1. These studies indicate that constitutively formed homo- and hetero-oligomers of opioid receptor subtypes can be detected in living cells containing less than 100,000 copies of the receptors. However, although hetero-oligomeric interactions between certain less closely related GPCRs can be detected, they appear to be of lower affinity than homo- or hetero-oligomers containing closely related sequences. Interactions recorded between certain GPCR family members in heterologous expression systems are likely to be artefacts of extreme levels of overexpression.