Characteristics of successful government-led interventions to support healthier populations: a starting portfolio of positive outlier examples.

Despite progress on the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals, significant public health challenges remain to address communicable and non-communicable diseases and health inequities. The Healthier Societies for Healthy Populations initiative convened by WHO's Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; the Government of Sweden; and the Wellcome Trust aims to address these complex challenges. One starting point is to build understanding of the characteristics of successful government-led interventions to support healthier populations. To this end, this project explored five purposefully sampled, successful public health initiatives: front-of-package warnings on food labels containing high sugar, sodium or saturated fat (Chile); healthy food initiatives (trans fats, calorie labelling, cap on beverage size; New York); the alcohol sales and transport ban during COVID-19 (South Africa); the Vision Zero road safety initiative (Sweden) and establishment of the Thai Health Promotion Foundation. For each initiative a qualitative, semistructured one-on-one interview with a key leader was conducted, supplemented by a rapid literature scan with input from an information specialist. Thematic analysis of the five interviews and 169 relevant studies across the five examples identified facilitators of success including political leadership, public education, multifaceted approaches, stable funding and planning for opposition. Barriers included industry opposition, the complex nature of public health challenges and poor interagency and multisector co-ordination. Further examples building on this global portfolio will deepen understanding of success factors or failures over time in this critical area.

The effect of hemodialysis on liver stiffness measurement: a single-center series.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The noninvasive measurement of liver stiffness using transient elastography (TE) is increasingly being used alongside liver biopsy. However, several conditions may lead to higher liver stiffness values without reflecting more fibrosis. Such conditions (e.g. hepatitis, cholestasis, heart failure, mechanical ventilation) limit the interpretation of liver stiffness measurements. The influence of hemodialysis on the measurement of liver stiffness has not been investigated to date. Here, we analyzed liver stiffness assessed by fibroscan in 17 patients directly before and after a hemodialysis session. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Measurement of hepatic stiffness by TE was carried out using the Fibroscan device with the 'M probe' directly before and directly after one session of hemodialysis. Each measurement consisted of at least 10 individual and valid measurements, with a success rate of at least 60%, and an interquartile range of less than 25%. All measurements were carried out by one investigator not involved in patient management. RESULTS: Before dialysis, the median TE was 5.1 kPa (2.8-17 kPa). Ten patients had values below the threshold of 7.1 kPa and seven patients had TE>7.1 kPa. The median net fluid withdrawal by hemodialysis was 2.5 l (0.4-3.1 l) and did not differ between patients. After dialysis, the TE median was 7.4 kPa (3.5-12.5 kPa) and had changed in all patients except one. Liver stiffness increased significantly when the initial TE was lower than 7.1 kPa (P=0.05), but not when the initial TE was higher than 7.1 kPa. Furthermore, the magnitude of the change in TE after hemodialysis correlated inversely with the liver stiffness before hemodialysis (P=0.03) and with spleen length measured by ultrasound (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on the influence of hemodialysis on liver stiffness measurement. In contrast to previous reports, liver stiffness might increase after fluid withdrawal if patients do not show significant fibrosis. We conclude that before dialysis, TE possibly better differentiates between patients with or without significant fibrosis.