Large method differences for free thyroid hormone assays in the hyperthyroid range can affect assessment of hyperthyroid status: Comparison of Abbott Alinity to Roche Cobas, Siemens Centaur and equilibrium dialysis LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Free T4 (FT4) determination is one of the most commonly performed biochemical tests in endocrinology. Treatment of thyroid dysfunctions is adjusted based on the severity of symptoms and biochemical test results. For Graves' hyperthyroidism, clinical guidelines recommend using FT4 as a (rough) guide to dose antithyroid drugs, together with other clinical information. It is well known that different platforms and methods give different FT4 results; however, large non-linear method differences at high FT4 concentrations are less well recognized. Current clinical guidelines do not make it clear that method differences in the hyperthyroid range can affect recommendations. METHOD: Serum samples from patients with very low (biochemically hypothyroid) to very high (hyperthyroid) concentrations of FT4 and/or free T3 (FT3) were analyzed using Abbott Alinity and compared to concentrations measured using Roche Cobas, Siemens ADVIA Centaur (FT4 only) and an in-house equilibrium dialysis liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. RESULTS: Alinity measured markedly lower FT4 and FT3 concentrations compared to the other methods, particularly at high FT4 concentrations. Regression analysis indicated that Alinity FT4 had a non-linear (curved) relationship to FT4 measured by the other methods. The method differences affected guideline-recommended treatments for hyperthyroidism. CONCLUSION: Measured free thyroid hormone concentrations are highly method-dependent, especially at high FT4 concentrations. Clinicians treating hyperthyroid patients should be aware that patients appear much less hyperthyroid from FT4-measurements performed using Alinity compared to Cobas or Centaur. Guideline-recommended antithyroid drug dosages based on FT4 (including multiples of the upper reference range) have to be adjusted to the FT4 method used. FT4 results from different methods should be clearly distinguished (e.g. separate lines) in medical records.

Analysis of free, unbound thyroid hormones by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: A mini-review of the medical rationale and analytical methods.

Measurement of hormones is important for the diagnosis and management of endocrine diseases. The thyroid hormones thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) are among the most commonly measured hormones in clinical laboratories, and it is the concentration of free (not bound to proteins) thyroid hormones that is clinically most relevant. Free thyroid hormones are commonly measured using automated immunoassays, however, these are known to produce erroneous results due to interferences for some patients. Measurement of free thyroid hormones using equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration combined with liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is considered a more accurate and robust method for free thyroid hormone analysis and overcomes many of the limitations of immunoassays. However, LC-MS/MS-based methods are often considered too technically difficult and not amendable to high throughput by clinical chemists and are not offered by many clinical laboratories. This mini-review aims to make it easier for clinical laboratories to implement LC-MS/MS-based measurement of free thyroid hormones. It describes the medical rationale for measuring free thyroid hormones, the benefits of LC-MS/MS-based methods with respect to interferences affecting immunoassay-based methods and physical separation methods. This mini-review highlights important parameters for ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis to obtain physiologically relevant free thyroid hormone concentrations and focuses on methods and devices used in clinical chemistry.

Diagnostic testing of autonomous cortisol secretion in adrenal incidentalomas.

OBJECTIVE: Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) is a condition with ACTH-independent cortisol overproduction from adrenal incidentalomas (AI) or adrenal hyperplasia. The hypercortisolism is often mild, and most patients lack typical clinical features of overt Cushing's syndrome (CS). ACS is not well defined and diagnostic tests lack validation. METHODS: Retrospective study of 165 patients with AI evaluated clinically and by assay of morning plasma ACTH, late-night saliva cortisol, serum DHEA sulphate (DHEAS), 24-h urine-free cortisol, and cortisol after dexamethasone suppression. RESULTS: Patients with AI (n = 165) were diagnosed as non-functioning incidentalomas (NFI) (n = 82) or ACS (n = 83) according to current European guidelines. Late-night saliva cortisol discriminated poorly between NFI and ACS, showing a high rate of false-positive (23/63) and false-negative (38/69) results. The conventional low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) did not improve the diagnostic specificity, compared with the 1 mg overnight DST. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of DHEAS in the two cohorts demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.76 (P < 0.01) with a sensitivity for ACS of 58% and a specificity of 80% using the recommended cutoff at 1.04 µmol/L (40 µg/dL). CONCLUSION: We here demonstrate in a large retrospective cohort of incidentaloma patients, that neither DHEAS, late-night saliva cortisol nor 24-h urine free cortisol are useful to discriminate between non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas and ACS. The conventional LDDST do not add further information compared with the 1 mg overnight DST. Alternative biomarkers are needed to improve the diagnostic workup of ACS.

Simultaneous assay of cortisol and dexamethasone improved diagnostic accuracy of the dexamethasone suppression test.

OBJECTIVES: The overnight dexamethasone (DXM) suppression test (DST) has high sensitivity, but moderate specificity, for diagnosing hypercortisolism. We have evaluated if simultaneous measurement of S-DXM may correct for variable DXM bioavailability and increase the diagnostic performance of DST, and if saliva (sa) is a feasible adjunct or alternative to serum. DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective study of DST was carried out in patients with suspected Cushing's syndrome (CS) (n = 49), incidentaloma (n = 152) and healthy controls (n = 101). Cortisol, cortisone and DXM were assayed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Three hundred and two subjects underwent DST; S-cortisol was ≥50 nmol/L in 83 patients, of whom 11 had CS and 27 had autonomous cortisol secretion. The lower 2.5 percentile of S-DXM in subjects with negative DST (n = 208) was 3.3 nmol/L, which was selected as the DXM cut-off level. Nine patients had the combination of low S-DXM and positive DST. Of these, three had been misdiagnosed as having autonomous cortisol secretion. DST results were highly reproducible and confirmed in a replication cohort (n = 58). Patients with overt CS had significantly elevated post-DST sa-cortisol and sa-cortisone levels compared with controls; 23 of 25 with autonomous cortisol secretion had elevated sa-cortisone and 14 had elevated sa-cortisol. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous measurement of serum DXM and cortisol reduced false-positive DSTs by 20% and improved the specificity. S-DXM >3.3 nmol/L is sufficient for the suppression of cortisol <50 nmol/L. Measurement of glucocorticoids in saliva is a non-invasive and easy procedure and post-DST sa-cortisone was found particularly useful in the diagnosis of CS.