[Gout and Its Management in Clinical Practice]. / Die Gicht und ihr Management in der Praxis.

Gout and Its Management in Clinical Practice Abstract. Resolution of an acute attack is usually the prime objective in routine clinical management of gout. Crystal identification in synovial fluid by polarised light microscopy is considered the diagnostic gold standard. Imaging procedures such as high-resolution ultrasonography are also useful. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids and colchicine (not approved in Switzerland, available from pharmacies) are used to treat an acute gout attack. Just as important as the diagnosis and treatment of an acute attack is the long-term management of hyperuricaemia in order to prevent further gout attacks as well as possible renal, cardiac or metabolic complications. Therefore, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of gout should, apart from non-pharmacologic interventions, receive hypouricaemic therapy with a target uric acid level of <360 µmol/l (<6 mg/dl). Drugs of first choice are xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Achievement of the therapeutic objective should be periodically reviewed, adjusting therapy as necessary.

Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data from the St. Gallen and Aarau Cohorts.

: Introduction: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor indicated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib have been shown in several randomized clinical trials. The study presented here aimed to assess the clinical tolerability and effectiveness of tofacitinib among RA patients in real life. Methods: Consecutive patients between January 2015 and April 2017 with RA who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria were included in a prospectively designed analysis of retrospective data. Patients were initiated on tofacitinib 5 mg bid. The primary objective was to analyze the safety of tofacitinib in a real-life cohort. Safety was assessed by the reasons to stop tofacitinib during follow up and changes of liver enzymes, hemoglobin, and creatinine. The secondary outcome was to analyze the frequency of and time to achieve low disease activity (LDA) and remission as defined by 28 joint count disease activity score (DAS28). Results: A total of 144 patients were treated with tofacitinib. A total of 84.9% of patients were pre-exposed to at least one biological agent. The average DAS28 at the initiation of tofacitinib was 4.43. A total of 50.0% of patients were positive for rheumatoid factor and 49.0% for ACPA. The mean follow up was 1.22 years (range 10d-3.7a) after initiation of tofacitinib treatment. A total of 94 (64.4%) patients remained on tofacitinib during follow-up. The average time to stop tofacitinib was 190.0 days. Reasons to stop tofacitinib were: insufficient response (n = 23), gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 18), infection (n = 5), myalgia (n = 2), remission (n = 2), headache (n = 2), cough, blue finger syndrome, intolerance, heartburn, psoriasis, and increased liver enzymes (all n = 1). Increased alanine amino transferase (ALAT) or aspartate amino transferase (ASAT) > 2× upper limit of normal (ULN) were detected in 3.3% and 4.4% of patients, respectively. Hemoglobin decrease of >10% was detected in 15.1% of the patients and decreased lymphocytes <500/µL in 3.4%. An increase of creatinine >20% was detected in 9.4% of patients. A total of 62.9% and 50.0% of the patients achieved low disease activity (LDA) or remission after a median of 319 and 645 days, respectively. These rates were significantly higher in patients naïve to biologic agents as compared to patients pre-exposed to biologics (LDA: naïve 100% 92 d, pre-exposed 57.0% 434 d, p ≤ 0.001; remission: naïve 86.7% 132 d, pre-exposed 44.1%, 692 d, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Tofacitinib is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with RA. Tofacitinib may induce high rates of LDA and remission in patients with active disease, even after the use of one or more biologics, though the rate appeared higher in patients naïve to biologics. Tofacitinib may be a valuable option in a treat-to-target approach. Our data demonstrate that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are safe and efficacious in real life patients.

Vasculitic complications of interferon-alpha treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: case report and review of the literature.

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) may be complicated by the development of systemic vasculitis. Vasculitis is either caused by mixed cryoglobulinemia or a non-cryoglobulinemic vasculitis resembling polyarteritis nodosa (PAN). Antiviral treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN) and subsequent clearing of HCV mostly leads to improvement of vasculitic symptoms, but vasculitis may also be exacerbated and even cases of new onset of vasculitis may occur. Exacerbations of both cryoglobulinemic and PAN-type vasculitis in chronic HCV infection have been described under treatment with IFN. The most common symptom is vasculitic neuropathy. However, peripheral neuropathy in a HCV-infected patient treated with IFN may also be caused by direct neurotoxic or antiangiogenic effects of IFN itself, often requiring a nerve biopsy to establish the exact diagnosis. The clinical course of vasculitic complications of IFN treatment is variable and ranges from regression of symptoms despite continuation of IFN treatment to fatal exacerbations despite termination of IFN treatment and additional immunosuppressive therapy. In most cases of IFN-induced vasculitis, immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids has been employed, leading to improvement of symptoms. We report the case of a patient with chronic HCV infection who first developed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis after initiation of therapy with the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated form of IFN (PEG-IFN) and discuss it in the context of the relevant literature. First onset of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis after initiation of IFN therapy has not been described so far.