Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure monitoring is the cornerstone in hemodynamic management of the cardiac surgical patient, and the radial artery is the most common site of catheter placement. The present study compared 3 different arterial line procedures. It is hypothesized that a 20-G 12.7- cm catheter inserted into the radial artery will be equal to a 20-G 12.7- cm angiocath placed in the brachial artery, and superior to a 20-G 5.00 cm angiocath placed in the radial artery. DESIGN: A prospective randomized control study was performed. SETTING: Single academic university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients ≥18 years old undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: After approval by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board, a randomized prospective control study to evaluate 3 different peripheral intraarterial catheter systems was performed: (1) Radial Short (RS): 20-G 5- cm catheter; (2) Radial Long (RL): 20-G 12- cm catheter; and (3) Brachial Long (BL): 20-G 12- cm catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Gradients between central aortic and peripheral catheters (CA-P) were compared and analyzed before CPB and 2 and 10 minutes after separation from CPB. The placement of femoral arterial lines and administration of vasoactive medications were recorded. After exclusions, 67 BL, 61 RL, and 66 RS patients were compared. Before CPB, CA-P SAP and MAP gradients were not significant among the 3 groups. Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient was significant for the RS group (p = 0.005) and insignificant for BL (p = 0.47) and RL (p = 0.39). Two-group analysis revealed that CA-P SAP gradients are similar between BL and RL (p = 0.84), both of which were superior to RS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). At 10 minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient for RS remained significant (p = 0.004) and similar to the gradient at 2 minutes. The CA-P SAP gradients increased from 2 to 10 minutes for BL (p = 0.13) and RL (p = 0.06). Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients were significant for the BL (p = 0.003), RL (p < 0.0001), and RS (p < 0.0001) groups. Two-group analysis revealed that the CA-P MAP gradients were lower for the BL group compared with the RL (p = 0.054) and RS (p< 0.05) groups. Ten minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients in the RL and RS groups remained significant (p < 0.0001) and both greater than the BL group (p = 0.002). A femoral arterial line was placed more frequently in the RS group (8/66 = 12.1%) than in the RL group (3/61 = 4.9%) and the BL group (2/67 = 3.0%). Vasopressin was administered significantly more frequently in the RS group. CONCLUSION: Regarding CA-P SAP gradients, the RL group performed equally to the BL group, both being superior to RS. Regarding CA-P MAP gradients, BL was superior to RL and RS. Clinically, femoral line placement and vasopressin administration were fewer for the BL and RL groups when compared with the RS group. This study demonstrated the benefits of a long (12.7 cm) 20- G angiocath placed in the radial artery.

Impact of a Preclinical Medical Student Anesthesiology Elective on the Attitudes and Perceptions of Medical Students Regarding Anesthesiology.

Purpose: First- and second-year medical students typically have limited exposure to the field of anesthesiology, yet recent match data shows growing interest in the specialty. Early, structured exposure to anesthesiology in the form of a preclinical elective may allow medical students to make more informed decisions on their specialty of choice. Methods: The anesthesiology preclinical elective, BIOL 6704: "Anesthesia: Much More than Putting you to Sleep", is a one-credit course taught at The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. A survey consisting of fifteen questions assessing changes in attitudes, perceptions, and interest in anesthesiology was distributed to first- and second-year medical students before and after course participation. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon's signed-rank test for paired samples. Results: The biggest impact of the preclinical elective was observed in the students' subjective understanding of key aspects of the practice of anesthesiology. Statistically significant improvement was seen in the understanding of airway management, anesthetic pharmacology, basics of ultrasound, vascular access, anesthesiology subspecialties, and an understanding of anesthesiology residency. Overall, results were limited by our small sample size. Conclusion: Our elective allows medical students to explore anesthesiology early in their medical school career. After taking this course, students noted more familiarity with various topics in anesthesiology. Peer institutions lacking a similar course may consider using our experience to increase interest about the specialty of anesthesiology for future students.

Delayed Anaphylactic Reaction to Midazolam in the Absence of Immediate Respiratory or Skin Manifestations.

Anaphylaxis, a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction, is a feared but uncommon complication of medications administered in the perioperative period. The incidence of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions has been reported to range from 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 1,361. Anesthesiologists are well aware of common causes of hypersensitivity such as paralytics and antibiotics; however, less common triggers of anaphylaxis need to be considered as well. Midazolam, a short acting benzodiazepine metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes, is considered very safe with a minimal risk profile. Previous reports have described adverse reactions to occur within seconds to minutes following the administration of midazolam. We describe a patient with no known history of asthma or allergies who underwent elective hydrocelectomy with spinal analgesia without incident until 42 minutes later at the conclusion of the procedure, when they experienced circulatory collapse necessitating immediate emergency treatment. This case emphasizes the necessity to improve knowledge and awareness of delayed hypersensitivity reactions following the administration of perioperative medications such as midazolam.

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Commonly Performed Peripheral Blocks: Using a Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound System.

Background: Handheld ultrasound devices have become popular among clinicians due to their affordability and compatibility with tablets and smartphones. Several handheld ultrasound devices have the capability to construct three-dimensional (3D) images using a traditional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound transducer. Objectives: The current study aimed to construct 3D images of common peripheral nerve and fascial plane blocks using a handheld ultrasound device with a 2D ultrasound probe. Methods: A total of 10 patients who were scheduled to receive ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient surgery and classified as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II with a body mass index of ≤ 30 kg/m2 were included in the study. Patients who presented with anatomical variations during the initial ultrasound scanning were excluded. Results: This study successfully constructed 3D images of 10 peripheral nerve blocks. The average time to complete each 3D scan was less than 5 seconds per attempt, with fascial plane blocks requiring twice the amount of time to complete. All the nerve blocks provided effective postoperative analgesia without complications. The 3D images were successfully captured in all patients. Conclusions: The 3D images provide clinicians with valuable information on the anatomical boundaries of the injectate that can further direct needle direction and placement of local anesthetic to achieve visual confidence of anesthetic spread.

Outpatient compared to inpatient thyroidectomy on 30-day postoperative outcomes: a national propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: To address the postoperative outcomes between outpatient and inpatient neck surgery involving thyroidectomy procedures. METHODS: A cohort analysis of surgical patients undergoing primary, elective, total thyroidectomy from multiple United States medical institutions who were registered with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite score that included any 30-day postoperative adverse event. RESULTS: A total of 55,381 patients who underwent a total thyroidectomy were identified comprising of 14,055 inpatient and 41,326 outpatient procedures. A cohort of 13,496 patients who underwent outpatient surgery were propensity matched for covariates with corresponding number of patients who underwent inpatient thyroidectomies. In the propensity matched cohort, the occurrence of any 30-day after surgery complications were greater in the inpatient group, 424 out of 13,496 (3.1%) compared to the outpatient group, 150 out of 13,496 (1.1%), P < 0.001. Moreover, death rates were greater in the inpatient group, 22 out 13,496 (0.16%) compared to the outpatient group, 2 out of 13,496 (0.01%), P < 0.001. Similarly, hospital readmissions occurred with greater frequency in the inpatient group, 438 out of 13,496 (3.2%) compared to the outpatient group, 310 out of 13,496 (2.3%), P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Thyroidectomy procedures performed in the outpatient setting had less rates of adverse events, including serious postoperative complications (e.g., surgical site infection, pneumonia, progressive renal insufficiency). In addition, patients who had thyroidectomy in the outpatient setting had less 30-day readmissions and mortality. Surgeons should recognize the benefits of outpatient thyroidectomy when selecting disposition of patients undergoing neck surgery.

Burnout and depression among anesthesiology trainees in the United States: An updated National Survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: A high prevalence of burnout, depression and suicidal ideation has been reported among anesthesiology trainees. Over the last decade, there has been a significant emphasis on the development of wellness programs in academic departments to mitigate the prevalence and effects of burnout during anesthesiology training. Therefore, we aimed to reevaluate the prevalence of burnout and depression in anesthesiology trainees in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Anesthesiology Department. PATIENTS: A nationally representative sample of 1000 anesthesiology trainees in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: A 33-item questionnaire consisting of 1) burnout, 2) depression, 3) job satisfaction, 4) family support, 5) work characteristics, 6) demographic factors, 7) self-reported errors, and 8) impact of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: We received 384 responses. Twenty-four percent (91/384) of the respondents met the criteria for high burnout risk and 58/384 (15%) of the respondents screened positive for depression. Multivariable analysis revealed that: (1) hours per week > 70, (odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval {CI}] = 3.1 [1.4-6.8], P=0.005 and (2) overnight calls per month > 7 (OR [95% CI] = 2.5 [1.0- 6.0], P=0.03 were independent factors for increased odds of burnout whereas the presence of (3) married/domestic partnership (OR [95% CI} = 0.52 [0.32-0.85], P=0.01 was associated with lower odds of burnout and/or depression. Ten percent (4/40) of high burnout/depression residents reported that they often times fall short in the quality of care provided to patients compared to 0.36% (1/275) residents with low burnout/depression scores, P < 0.001. Similarly, 22% (9/40) of high burnout/depression residents reported that they often times did not have enough attention to their patients compared to 4% (11/275) residents with low burnout/depression scores, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: We report a still concerning but significantly lower rate of burnout and depression in anesthesiology trainees than previously reported a decade ago. This suggests that efforts on wellness implemented by academic programs have positively impacted the work experience of anesthesia trainees.

The Impact of a New Anesthesiology Residency Program on the Number of Medical Students Matching Into Anesthesiology at a Single Institution: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

Introduction There are projected workforce shortages within anesthesiology exacerbated by an increase in demand for anesthesia services and an aging anesthesia workforce. Given this mismatch, it is critical for the specialty to recruit the next generation of anesthesiologists and understand the factors affecting medical students' decision to apply to anesthesiology. This study aims to evaluate the impact of establishing a new anesthesiology residency program at a single institution on the number of medical students that match into anesthesiology in the subsequent years. Methods A single-center, retrospective longitudinal study examined the number of medical students matching into anesthesiology at a single institution between 2013 and 2023, five years before and after the establishment of an accredited anesthesiology residency program. The data were compared to aggregated data on all US medical student applicants through the National Resident Matching Program. Results The pre-anesthesiology residency match rate (2013-2018) of medical students from Alpert Medical School (AMS) was 2.47% while the post-anesthesiology residency match rate (2019-2023) was 4.30%. This represents a 74% increase in the average proportion of medical students matching into anesthesiology after the start of the residency program compared to a 20% increase nationally over the same time period. The rate of change of AMS matched applicants after the implementation of the AMS anesthesia residency program increased compared to the national applicant pool (p= 0.002). Conclusion The establishment of a new accredited anesthesiology residency program increased the proportion of medical students matching into anesthesiology at the affiliated medical school in the subsequent five years. Exposure to an academic anesthesiology program improves medical student interest and ultimately matches rates in anesthesiology, a vital tool to address the projected shortages in the anesthesiology workforce.

The Effectiveness of Direct Supervision by an Attending Compared To a Senior Resident on Quality of Supervision of Novice Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Study.

Background: New trainees are directly supervised by either an attending physician or a senior resident under indirect supervision from an attending physician. The main objective was to evaluate which type of direct supervision (attending vs. senior resident) would result in better quality of supervision to novice residents during their first month of training. Methods: Novice anesthesiology residents were randomized to receive direct supervision by an attending anesthesiologist or a senior resident during their introduction month of intraoperative anesthesia. The primary outcome was a validated instrument to evaluate supervision performance of the instructor. The secondary outcome was a validated anxiety scale. Results: The overall mean supervision score across the study days was greater in the residents who were directly supervised by attendings, mean (standard error [SE]) of 3.88 ± 0.03 compared with direct supervision by a senior resident, mean (SE) of 3.77 ± 0.03 a mean difference of 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16), P = .0012. Five of 9 individual items on the supervision survey were significantly greater in the group directly supervised by attendings compared with residents. There was no difference between groups regarding anxiety scores. In contrast, there was a mild association between supervision scores and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 anxiety scores, correlation coefficient = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08-0.39), P < .0035. Conclusions: We detected better supervision scores when novice anesthesiology residents were directly supervised by attendings when compared with senior residents. Nevertheless, direct supervision by senior residents still provided supervision scores consistent with a safe supervision practice.

Thromboelastometry Predicts Thromboembolic Events, Hospital Length of Stay, and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 Infection and Mild Hypoxemia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess changes in hemostasis and associated outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection and mild hypoxemia. Methods: Adult patients with COVID-19 infection and hypoxemia admitted to ICU were included in this prospective observational study. The primary outcome was defined as an unfavorable course of the disease if a patient: (1) developed a thromboembolic event while receiving anticoagulation prophylaxis, (2) had prolonged ICU stay, or (3) died. Demographic data, laboratory parameters and thromboelastometry (ROTEM) test results were collected. Results: Twenty-five patients were recruited into the study. There were 16 patients with an unfavorable course of the disease. Compared to the 9 patients in the favorable course group, patients with an unfavorable course had a lower platelet count, median difference of 154 (95% CI, 26 to 223 x109/L), P = 0.012, and lower clot firmness parameters in EXTEM assay: amplitude at 20 minutes (A20), median difference of 7 (95% CI, 2 to 11) P = 0.006, maximum clot firmness (MCF), median difference of 6 (95% CI, 3 to 10) P = 0.006 and area under the curve (AUC) with a median difference of 671 (95% CI, 244 to 1029) P = 0.005. They also demonstrated suppression of fibrinolysis: higher lysis index 60, median difference of -3 (95% CI, -6 to 0), P = 0.023. Results of functional fibrinogen (FIBTEM) assay were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The platelet count and the results of EXTEM assay, but not FIBTEM assay, were associated with the difference in clinical outcome among patients with COVID-19 infection and hypoxemia. The role of platelets in the outcome of COVID-19 infection calls for further investigation. Future studies on adjusting anticoagulant therapy based on the results of viscoelastic testing may be beneficial.

The impact of hypoalbuminemia on postoperative outcomes after outpatient surgery: a national analysis of the NSQIP database.

PURPOSE: Hypoalbuminemia has been described as a modifiable factor to optimize postoperative outcomes after major inpatient surgeries. Nevertheless, the role of hypoalbuminemia on outpatient procedures is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of hypoalbuminemia on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing low-risk outpatient surgery. METHODS: Patients were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had outpatient surgery from 2018 and recorded preoperative albumin levels. The primary outcome was a composite of any major complications including: 1) unplanned intubation, 2) pulmonary embolism, 3) ventilator use > 48 hr, 4) progressive renal failure, 5) acute renal failure, 6) stroke/cerebrovascular accident, 7) cardiac arrest, 8) myocardial infarction, 9) sepsis, 10) septic shock, 11) deep venous thrombosis, and 12) transfusion. Death, any infection, and readmissions were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 65,192 (21%) surgical outpatients had albumin collected preoperatively and 3,704 (1.2%) patients had levels below 3.5 g⋅dL-1. In the albumin cohort, 394/65,192 (0.6%) patients had a major medical complication and 68/65,192 (0.1%) patients died within 30 days after surgery. Albumin values < 3.5 g⋅dL-1 were associated with major complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 2.57; P < 0.001; death-adjusted OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.72 to 5.34; P < 0.001); any infection (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.82; P < 0.001); and readmissions (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.14; P < 0.001). In addition, when evaluated as a continuous variable in a multivariate analysis, for each increase in albumin of 0.10 g⋅dL-1, there was an associated reduction of major complications (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoalbuminemia is associated with major complications and death in outpatient surgery. Since hypoalbuminemia is a potential modifiable intervention, future clinical trials to evaluate the impact of optimizing preoperative albumin levels before outpatient surgery are warranted.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hypoalbuminémie a été décrite comme un facteur modifiable pour optimiser les issues postopératoires après des chirurgies hospitalières majeures. Néanmoins, le rôle de l'hypoalbuminémie dans les interventions ambulatoires n'est pas bien défini. L'objectif de cette étude était d'examiner l'impact de l'hypoalbuminémie sur les issues postopératoires des patients bénéficiant d'une chirurgie ambulatoire à faible risque. MéTHODE: Les patients ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie ambulatoire à partir de 2018 et pour lesquels les taux d'albumine préopératoire ont été enregistrés ont été extraits de la base de données américaine du programme national d'amélioration de la qualité chirurgicale (NSQIP) de l'American College of Surgeons. Le critère d'évaluation principal était un composite de toutes les complications majeures, y compris : 1) intubation non planifiée, 2) embolie pulmonaire, 3) utilisation d'un ventilateur > 48 h, 4) insuffisance rénale progressive, 5) insuffisance rénale aiguë, 6) accident vasculaire cérébral, 7) arrêt cardiaque, 8) infarctus du myocarde, 9) sepsis, 10) choc septique, 11) thrombose veineuse profonde, et 12) transfusion. Les décès, infections et réadmissions constituaient des critères d'évaluation secondaires. RéSULTATS: Au total, les taux d'albumine ont été prélevés chez 65 192 (21 %) patients chirurgicaux ambulatoires avant l'opération et 3704 (1,2 %) patients avaient des taux inférieurs à 3,5 g⋅dL-1. Dans la cohorte albumine, 394 / 65 192 (0,6 %) patients ont eu une complication médicale majeure et 68 / 65 192 (0,1%) patients sont décédés dans les 30 jours suivant la chirurgie. Des valeurs d'albumine < 3,5 g⋅dL-1 étaient associées à des complications majeures (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCA]), 1,92 ; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,44 à 2,57; P < 0,001; RC ajusté en fonction du décès, 3,03; IC 95 %, 1,72 à 5,34; P < 0,001); infections (RCA, 1,49; IC 95 %, 1,23 à 1,82; P < 0,001); et réadmissions (RCA, 1,82; IC 95 %, 1,56 à 2,14; P < 0,001). De plus, lorsque le taux d'albumine était évalué comme variable continue dans une analyse multivariée, pour chaque augmentation de l'albumine de 0,10 g⋅dL-1, il y avait une réduction associée des complications majeures (RCA, 0,94; IC 95 %, 0,92 à 0,96; P < 0,001). CONCLUSION: L'hypoalbuminémie est associée à des complications majeures et au décès en chirurgie ambulatoire. Étant donné que l'hypoalbuminémie est une intervention potentiellement modifiable, de futures études cliniques visant à évaluer l'impact de l'optimisation des taux préopératoires d'albumine avant une chirurgie ambulatoire sont nécessaires.

In vivo, in situ and ex vivo comparison of porcine skin for microprojection array penetration depth, delivery efficiency and elastic modulus assessment.

With the development of wearable technologies, the interfacial properties of skin and devices have become much more important. For research and development purposes, porcine skin is often used to evaluate device performance, but the differences between in vivo, in situ and ex vivo porcine skin mechanical properties can potentially misdirect investigators during the development of their technology. In this study, we investigated the significant changes to mechanical properties with and without perfusion (in vivo versus in vitro tissue). The device focus for this study was a skin-targeting Nanopatch vaccine microneedle device, employed to assess the variance to key skin engagement parameters - penetration depth and delivery efficiency - due to different tissue conditions. The patches were coated with fluorescent or 14C radiolabelled formulations for penetration depth and delivery efficiency quantification in vivo, and at time points up to 4 h post mortem. An immediate cessation of blood circulation saw mean microneedle penetration depth fell from ∼100 µm to ∼55 µm (∼45%). Stiffening of underlying tissues as a result of rigor mortis then augmented the penetration depths at the 4 h timepoint back to ∼100 µm, insignificantly different (p = 0.0595) when compared with in vivo. The highest delivery efficiency of formulation into the skin (dose measured in the skin excluding leftover dose on skin and patch surfaces) was also observed at this time point of ∼25%, up from ∼2% in vivo. Data obtained herein progresses medical device development, highlighting the need to consider the state and muscle tissues when evaluating prototypes on cadavers.

Successful Anesthetic Management of an Adult with Sotos Syndrome.

Sotos syndrome is a rare genetic disorder presenting with craniofacial abnormalities, profound hypotonia, and cardiac abnormalities, giving rise to several potential challenges and concerns for an anesthesiologist. When preparing for a Sotos syndrome patient's case, we consulted the literature for precedents on how to plan the anesthetic, to which we were only able to find a few reports and nothing in the age group our patient fell within. We present our case of an adult in addition to examining the previous cases so as to document a precedent when encountering patients with this syndrome in the operating room. We describe a unique case of a nonverbal adult with hypotonia and severe craniofacial abnormalities who successfully underwent multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia, with no complications other than a delay of emergence attenuated by naloxone. Our case and the seven previous documented cases over the past several decades demonstrate anesthesia, including paralytics and intubation itself safe despite obvious concerns given the common features of the syndrome for both pediatric patients and the one adult we described in this report.

Utility of preoperative laboratory testing in ASA 1 & ASA 2 patients undergoing outpatient surgery in the United States.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of preoperative testing in ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients undergoing outpatient surgery across several surgical specialties. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2018 was queried to extract patients defined as ASA 1 and 2 who underwent outpatient surgeries. A total of 352,775 adult patients underwent outpatient surgery with 186,954 patients had at least one lab drawn within 30 days prior to the surgery. INTERVENTIONS: ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients who underwent outpatient surgeries. MEASUREMENTS: The primary independent variable was the utilization of preoperative laboratory testing. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of any medical or surgical complication adverse events within 30 days of discharge. In addition, we also examined hospital readmissions. A P value of 0.025 was used to avoid type I error for each primary outcome. MAIN RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 186,954 out of 352,775 (53%) of patients had at least one lab test. Hematology was the most common lab test ordered, 172,903 out of 352,755 patients (49%), followed by chemistry (43%), liver function (23%), and coagulation tests (11%). After adjusting for confounding factors, the use preoperative testing was not associated with overall medical complications, OR (95%CI) of 1.09 (1.00 to 1.18), P = 0.05 and overall surgical complications, 1.00 (0.92 to 1.08), P = 0.96 [Bonferroni corrected: medical complications OR (97.5% CI) of 1.09 (0.989 to 1.202), P = 0.0950 and overall surgical complications, 1.00 (0.918 to 1.093), P = 1.00. CONCLUSION: We detected a low utility of preoperative tests for ASA 1 and 2 patients undergoing a large variety of outpatient procedures. Our results support the elimination of preoperative laboratory test for ASA 1 and 2 undergoing ambulatory surgery.

Early Postoperative Outcomes of Super Morbid Obese Compared to Morbid Obese Patients After Ambulatory Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of a National Database.

BACKGROUND: Patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2, defined as super morbid obesity, represent the fastest growing segment of patients with obesity in the United States. It is currently unknown if super morbid obese patients are at greater odds than morbid obese patients for poor outcomes after outpatient surgery. The main objective of the current investigation is to assess if super morbid obese patients are at increased odds for postoperative complications after outpatient surgery when compared to morbid obese patients. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2017 to 2018 was queried to extract and compare patients who underwent outpatient surgery and were defined as either morbidly obese (BMI >40 and <50 kg/m2) or super morbidly obese (BMI ≥50 kg/m2). The primary outcome was the occurrence of medical adverse events within 72 hours of discharge. In addition, we also examine death and readmissions as secondary outcomes. A propensity-matched analysis was used to evaluate the association of BMI ≥50 kg/m2 versus BMI between 40 and 50 kg/m2 and the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 661,729 outpatient surgeries were included in the 2017-2018 NSQIP database. Of those, 7160 with a BMI ≥50 kg/m2 were successfully matched to 7160 with a BMI <50 and ≥40 kg/m2. After matching, 17 of 7160 (0.24%) super morbid obese patients had 3-day medical complications compared to 15 of 7160 (0.21%) morbid obese patients (odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval {CI}] = 1.13 [0.57-2.27], P = .72). The rate of 3-day surgical complications in super morbid obese patients was also not different from morbid obese patients. Thirty-five of 7160 (0.48%) super morbid obese patients were readmitted within 3 days, compared to 33 of 7160 (0.46%) morbid obese patients (OR [95% CI] = 1.06 [0.66-1.71], P = .80). When evaluated in a multivariable analysis as a continuous variable (1 unit increase in BMI) in all patients, BMI ≥40 kg/m2 was not significantly associated with overall medical complications (OR [95% CI] = 1.00 [0.98-1.04], P = .87), overall surgical complication (OR [95% CI] = 1.02 [0.98-1.06], P = .23), or readmissions (OR [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.97-1.02], P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Super morbid obesity is not associated with higher rates of early postoperative complications when compared to morbid obese patients. Specifically, early pulmonary complications were very low after outpatient surgery. Super morbid obese patients should not be excluded from outpatient procedures based on a BMI cutoff alone.

Spinal versus general anesthesia for patients undergoing outpatient total knee arthroplasty: a national propensity matched analysis of early postoperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A comparison of different anesthetic techniques to evaluate short term outcomes has yet to be performed for patients undergoing outpatient knee replacements. The aim of this investigation was to compare short term outcomes of spinal (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing outpatient total knee replacements. METHODS: The ACS NSQIP datasets were queried to extract patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between 2005 and 2018 performed as an outpatient procedure. The primary outcome was a composite score of serious adverse events (SAE). The primary independent variable was the type of anesthesia (e.g., general vs. spinal). RESULTS: A total of 353,970 patients who underwent TKA procedures were identified comprising of 6,339 primary, elective outpatient TKA procedures. Of these, 2,034 patients received GA and 3,540 received SA. A cohort of 1,962 patients who underwent outpatient TKA under GA were propensity matched for covariates with patients who underwent outpatient TKA under SA. SAE rates at 72 h after surgery were not greater in patients receiving GA compared to SA (0.92%, 0.66%, P = 0.369). In contrast, minor adverse events were greater in the GA group compared to SA (2.09%, 0.51%), P < 0.001. The rate of postoperative transfusion was greater in the patients receiving GA. CONCLUSIONS: The type of anesthetic technique, general or spinal anesthesia does not alter short term SAEs, readmissions and failure to rescue in patients undergoing outpatient TKR surgery. Recognizing the benefits of SA tailored to the anesthetic management may maximize the clinical benefits in this patient population.

An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs.

BACKGROUND: Pain medicine fellowship applicants often seek information about programs from the Internet, which is becoming even more relevant with the transition to virtual interviews as a consequence of the global pandemic. Previous literature has revealed the significance of training program websites as part of the application process in other specialties. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the content, design, organization, and user friendliness by using a composite score to determine the quality of the pain medicine fellowship websites (PMFW). METHODS: Accredited pain medicine fellowship programs was queried from three databases for pain medicine education: (1) Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS); (2) the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA); and (3) the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Programs that appeared within one and/or more databases were eligible for study inclusion. PMFW were evaluated for the accessibility of recruitment and education content items. The quality of PMFW was determined as multifactorial composed of four dimensions: content, design, organization, and user friendliness. RESULTS: For program recruitment, PMFW contained an average of 12 ± 4.0 of 32 content items (38%) for fellowship programs: (1) 83% of fellowship programs specified the number of positions available for the 2021 Match; (2) 17% indicated alumni career placement; (3) 6.8% supplied interview dates; and (4) merely 4.9% detailed the selection process. For program education, PMFW contained an average of 7 ± 3.4 of 16 content items (44%): (1) 70% of programs provided a rotation schedule; (2) 49% detailed operative experiences; and (3) just 16% included simulation training. Regarding the quality based on content, design, organization, and user friendliness, the average PMFW was not "good" with only 1% of PMFW meeting "great" standards. A kappa value of 0.92 was calculated for inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The web presence of pain medicine fellowship programs falls short of providing essential accessibility, content, design, organization, and user friendliness to allow applicants to adequately access information about program characteristics. There are ample opportunities to increase the effectiveness of PMFW to benefit training programs and to inform prospective applicants, especially given the rise of virtual applications and interviews.

An evaluation of impact factor bias of clinical trials published in pain journals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies with nonsignificant results are less likely to be published or published in lower impact factor journals. To determine whether a similar phenomenon occurs in pain literature, we explored impact factor bias in peer-reviewed pain journals. METHODS: A PubMed search involving randomized controlled trials in pain journals during 2012 through 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the publication impact factor. Exclusion criteria included commentaries, editorials, meta-analyses, reviews, and animal studies. The average impact factor for each journal was determined. The primary independent variable was a study with a positive outcome. RESULTS: Of the 9 journals evaluated, 1108 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. The quartiles for the impact factor for the journals included were 2.5, 2.9, and 3.6. A multivariate analysis identified sample size greater than 100, description of a sample size calculation, presence of a stated hypothesis, and presence of sponsorship funding as independent predictors of publication in a journal with greater impact factor. In contrast, positive results were not associated with publication in a greater impact factor journal, even when forced into the model, P = 0.49. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for study factors associated with publication, there is no evidence of impact factor bias within the pain literature. The lack of impact factor bias in the pain literature is a positive finding for the field and should benefit scientific development and the clinical care of patients.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: an analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases.

BACKGROUND: Seventy percent of surgical procedures are currently performed in the outpatient setting. Although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification ability to predict risk has been evaluated for in-patient surgeries, an evaluation in outpatient surgeries has yet to be performed. The major goal of the current study is to determine if the ASA classification is an independent predictor for morbidity and mortality for outpatient surgeries. METHODS: The 2005 through 2016 NSQIP Participant Use Data Files were queried to extract all patients scheduled for outpatient surgery. ASA PS class was the primary independent variable of interest. The primary outcome was 30-day medical complications, defined as having one or more of the following postoperative outcomes: (1) deep vein thrombosis, (2) pulmonary embolism, (3) reintubation, (4) failure to wean from ventilator, (5) renal insufficiency, (6) renal failure, (7) stroke, (8) cardiac arrest, (9) myocardial infarction, (10) pneumonia, (11) urinary tract infection, (12) systemic sepsis or septic shock. Mortality was also evaluated as a separate outcome. RESULTS: A total of 2,089,830 cases were included in the study. 24,777 (1.19%) patients had medical complications and 1,701 (0.08%) died within 30 days. ASA PS IV patients had a much greater chance of dying when compared to healthy patients, OR (95%CI) of 89 (55 to 143), P < 0.001. Nonetheless, over 30,000 ASA PS IV patients had surgery in the outpatient setting. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a stepwise independent association between ASA PS class and medical complications (C statistic = 0.70), mortality (C statistic = 0.74) and readmissions (C statistic = 0.67). Risk stratifying ability was maintained across surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. CONCLUSIONS: ASA PS class is a simple risk stratification tool for surgeries in the outpatient setting. Patients with higher ASA PS classes subsequently developed medical complications or mortality at a greater frequency than patients with lower ASA PS class after outpatient surgery. Our results suggest that the ambulatory setting may not be able to match the needs of high-risk patients.