Perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Persistent post-surgical pain affects 10-80% of individuals after common operations, and is more common among patients with psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, or catastrophising. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment. Paired independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Our search of five electronic databases, up to September 1, 2016, found 15 trials (2220 patients) that were eligible for review. For both persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment, perioperative education was ineffective, while active psychotherapy suggested a benefit (test of interaction P=0.01 for both outcomes). Moderate quality evidence showed that active perioperative psychotherapy (cognitive-behaviour therapy, relaxation therapy, or both) significantly reduced persistent post-surgical pain [weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.06 cm on a 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.56 to -0.55 cm; risk difference (RD) for achieving no more than mild pain (≤3 cm) 14%, 95% CI 8-21%] and physical impairment [WMD -9.87% on the 0-100% Oswestry Disability Index, 95% CI -13.42 to -6.32%, RD for achieving no more than mild disability (≤20%) 21%, 95% CI 13-29%]. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation therapy are effective for reducing persistent pain and physical impairment after surgery. Future studies should explore targeted psychotherapy for surgical patients at higher risk for poor outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016047335.

A first-in-class, first-in-human, phase I trial of p28, a non-HDM2-mediated peptide inhibitor of p53 ubiquitination in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This first-in-human, phase I clinical trial of p28 (NSC745104), a 28-amino-acid fragment of the cupredoxin azurin, investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity of p28 in patients with p53(+) metastatic solid tumours. METHODS: A total of 15 patients were administered p28 i.v. as a short infusion three times per week for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest under an accelerated titration 3+3 dose escalation design until either a grade 3-related adverse event occurred or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. Single-dose and steady-state serum pharmacokinetics were characterised. Assessments included toxicity, best objective response by RECIST 1.1 Criteria, and overall survival. RESULTS: No patients exhibited any dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), significant adverse events or exhibited an immune response (IgG) to the peptide. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and MTD were not reached. Seven patients demonstrated stable disease for 7-61 weeks, three a partial response for 44-125 weeks, and one a complete response for 139 weeks. Three patients are still alive at 158, 140, and 110 weeks post therapy completion. CONCLUSION: p28 was tolerated with no significant adverse events. An MTD was not reached. Evidence of anti-tumour activity indicates a highly favourable therapeutic index and demonstrates proof of concept for this new class of non-HDM2-mediated peptide inhibitors of p53 ubiquitination.

Rural lesbians' strategies for coming out to health care professionals.

Abstract The authors conducted in-depth interviews with lesbians from rural communities in the midwest about their interactions with health care professionals and how they decided whether to disclose their sexual orientation to them. They described the protective strategies they used when seeking health care and the responses they received to the disclosure of their sexual orientation. The four primary protective strategies included screening, planned disclosure, unplanned disclosure and non-disclosure. Participants voiced concerns over rejection or retaliation by health care professionals and by other community residents if their sexual orientation became known, and that they would be unable to obtain safe, appropriate care given the limited availability of health care service providers in their region.