Evaluating unmet needs in large-volume subcutaneous drug delivery: U.S. payer perspectives on a novel, large-volume on-body delivery system.

OBJECTIVE: Existing healthcare systems face finite resource allocation and budgetary constraints, resulting in a substantial need for innovative solutions to enhance service delivery at reduced costs. A novel, user-friendly on-body delivery system (OBDS) was developed which enables administration of large-volume subcutaneous (SC) drugs in both clinical and home-based settings (at-home healthcare professional [HCP] administration or at-home self-administration). METHODS: This research sought to evaluate the potential economic impact of at-home self- or HCP- administration with the OBDS through a comprehensive review of published literature and semi-structured interviews with 17 US payers representing approximately 227 million covered lives. RESULTS: Published literature on OBDS remains limited, but available research highlights the cost-savings of SC administration due to reduced healthcare resource utilization, particularly with home-based care, and improved patient compliance. In interviews, payers identified several attributes that would help address unmet clinical and economic needs. Clinically, the hidden needle and ease-of-use compared to SC syringe pumps was deemed valuable to improve patient compliance and, as OBDS required minimal training, reduce the risk of administration errors. The flexibility to administer drugs at home (self-administration or HCP-administration) or in-clinic was identified as the most impactful attribute on coverage decision making as it has the greatest potential to reduce costs associated with HCP administration for several therapeutic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Given the ability to help address critical unmet needs for the patient and healthcare system, a large proportion of the payers stated that the novel OBDS would warrant a price premium versus the cost of the standalone SC vial and certainly over the IV counterpart. Future research to quantify the value that OBDS efficiencies could bring to healthcare delivery are warranted.

A primer on brand-name prescription drug contracting.

Prescription drug contracting in the United States has evolved over decades from discounts provided to members of early health maintenance organization plans to rebate contracts to more complex value-based purchasing arrangements. This primer describes the history of contracting between pharmaceutical manufacturers and managed care pharmacy organizations and details the various contracting methods used today.

A rapid and simple sterility test method based on solid culture medium containing blood.

Current sterility test performed for most biological products takes 14 days. We evaluated solid medium, containing 5% blood for use in the membrane filtration (MF) and direct inoculation (DI) sterility test. Representative microorganisms prepared in a sample matrix at approximately 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 colony forming units were tested for growth by compendial MF sterility test using fluid thioglycolate medium and tryptic soy broth and also on the Schaedler blood agar (SBA). Sterility test performed on SBA was significantly more sensitive and faster in detecting various microorganisms than the compendial method, particularly for sample matrix containing 0.01% thimerosal (p < 0.05). SBA detected all microorganisms within 7 days. To implement solid medium in the DI sterility test, multiple BA plates were inoculated with the sample. All representative microorganisms were detected within 5 days. The sterility test using solid medium required 3 different incubation conditions, 30-35 °C aerobically and anaerobically to detect bacteria, and at 20-25 °C aerobically to detect mold and yeast. To eliminate aerobic incubation of solid medium at 20-25 °C, we evaluated representative species of mold and yeast for their growth at 30-35 °C and 20-25 °C in the sterility test performed on solid medium. Penicillium chrysogenum could not be detected at 30-35 °C consistently within 7 days. Sterility test performed on solid medium without any additional technology could be completed in 7 days, as compared to the 14 days required for the current compendial method.

Guided therapy selection in rheumatoid arthritis using a molecular signature response classifier: an assessment of budget impact and clinical utility.

BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be treated with a range of targeted therapies following inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate. Whereas clinical practice guidelines provide no formal recommendations for initial targeted therapies, the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) class is the prevalent first-line selection based on clinician experience, its safety profile, and/or formulary requirements, while also being the costliest. Most patients do not achieve adequate clinical response with a first-line TNFi, however. A molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) test that assesses RA-related biomarkers can identify patients who are unlikely to achieve adequate response to TNFi-class therapies. OBJECTIVE: To model cost-effectiveness of MSRC-guided, first-line targeted therapy selection compared with current standard care. METHODS: This budget impact analysis used data sourced from August to September 2020. The prevalence of each first-line targeted therapy was obtained using market intelligence from Datamonitor/Informa PLC Rheumatology Dashboard Forecast 2020, and the average first-year cost of treatment for each class was calculated using wholesale acquisition costs from IBM Micromedex RED BOOK Online. Average effectiveness for each class was based on manufacturer-reported ACR50 response rates (American College of Rheumatology adequate response criteria of 50% improvement at 6 months after therapy initiation). The impact of MSRC testing on first therapy selection was predicted based on a third party-generated decision-impact study that analyzed potential alterations in rheumatologist prescribing patterns after receiving MSRC test reports. Sensitivity analysis evaluated potential impacts of variation in first-year medication cost, adherence to MSRC report, and test price on the first-year cost of treatment. Cost for response (first-year therapy cost therapy divided by probability of achieving ACR50) was compared between standard care and MSRC-guided care. RESULTS: The estimated cost for first-year, standard-care treatment was $65,117, with 80% of patients initiating treatment with a TNFi. Cost for achieving ACR50 response was $177,046. After applying MSRC-guided patient stratification and therapy selection, the first-year cost was $56,543, net of test price, with 49.0% of patients initiating with a TNFi. First-year MSRC-guided care cost, including test price, was estimated at $117,103, a 33.9% improvement over standard care. Sensitivity analysis showed a net cost improvement for guided care vs standard care across all scenarios. Patients predicted to be inadequate TNFi responders, when modeled with lower-priced alternatives, were predicted to show increased ACR50 response rates. Those with MSRC test results indicating a first-line TNFi were predicted to show an ACR50 response rate superior to that for any other class. In this model, if implemented clinically, MSRC-guided care might save the US health care system more than $850 million annually and improve ACR50 by up to 31.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Precision medicine using MSRC-guided patient stratification and therapy selection may both decrease cost and improve efficacy of targeted RA therapies. DISCLOSURES: This work was funded in full by Scipher Medicine Corporation, which participated in data analysis and interpretation and drafting, reviewing, and approving the publication. All authors contributed to data analysis and interpretation and publication preparation, maintaining control over the final content. Arnell, Withers, and Connolly-Strong are employees of and have stock ownership in Scipher Medicine Corporation. Bergman has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Scipher Medicine and owns stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. Kenney, Logan, and Lim-Harashima are consultants for Scipher Medicine Corporation. Basu has nothing to disclose.

Comparative use of CRISPR and RNAi to modulate integrin α3ß1 in triple negative breast cancer cells reveals that some pro-invasive/pro-metastatic α3ß1 functions are independent of global regulation of the transcriptome.

Integrin receptors for the extracellular matrix play critical roles at all stages of carcinogenesis, including tumor growth, tumor progression and metastasis. The laminin-binding integrin α3ß1 is expressed in all epithelial tissues where it has important roles in cell survival, migration, proliferation, and gene expression programs during normal and pathological tissue remodeling. α3ß1 signaling and adhesion functions promote tumor growth and metastasis in a number of different types of cancer cells. Previously, we used RNA interference (RNAi) technology to suppress the expression of the ITGA3 gene (encoding the α3 subunit) in the triple-negative breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, thereby generating variants of this line with reduced expression of integrin α3ß1. This approach revealed that α3ß1 promotes pro-tumorigenic functions such as cell invasion, lung metastasis, and gene regulation. In the current study, we used CRISPR technology to knock out the ITGA3 gene in MDA-MB-231 cells, thereby ablating expression of integrin α3ß1 entirely. RNA-seq analysis revealed that while the global transcriptome was altered substantially by RNAi-mediated suppression of α3ß1, it was largely unaffected following CRISPR-mediated ablation of α3ß1. Moreover, restoring α3ß1 to the latter cells through inducible expression of α3 cDNA failed to alter gene expression substantially, suggesting that use of CRISPR to abolish α3ß1 led to a decoupling of the integrin from its ability to regulate the transcriptome. Interestingly, both cell invasion in vitro and metastatic colonization in vivo were reduced when α3ß1 was abolished using CRISPR, as we observed previously using RNAi to suppress α3ß1. Taken together, our results show that pro-invasive/pro-metastatic roles for α3ß1 are not dependent on its ability to regulate the transcriptome. Moreover, our finding that use of RNAi versus CRISPR to target α3ß1 produced distinct effects on gene expression underlines the importance of using multiple approaches to obtain a complete picture of an integrin's functions in cancer cells.

An analysis of member retention patterns for adult rare disease cohorts to support evaluating multiyear payment arrangements for novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, treatment for chronic conditions addressed symptoms or was disease modifying and required lifelong periodic administration and recurring costs. Cell and gene therapies for rare diseases often require a short administration period relative to their expected long-term clinical benefit. Costs have historically been recognized when the service or treatment is administered, resulting in the potential for the cost associated with the possible long-term clinical benefit of cell and gene therapies being incurred during a short administration period. Innovative payment arrangements have been proposed to improve the synchronization of the payment and the emergence of the clinical benefit. Expected payments associated with a multiyear payment arrangement will depend on many factors, but key drivers of the payments include efficacy, durability of effect, mortality, and member retention. This research extends a previous study by analyzing member retention for adult patients with certain rare diseases. OBJECTIVE: To develop member retention estimates from a US commercial payer's perspective for adults diagnosed with certain rare diseases during a 10-year period. METHODS: Four population cohorts were examined: (1) self-insured - all subscribers, (2) self-insured - rare medical condition, (3) fully insured - all subscribers, and (4) fully insured - rare medical condition. Seven rare medical conditions were prospectively selected: cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, Gaucher disease, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, spina bifida, and thalassemia. We limited the study cohort to members who were either the subscriber or the subscriber's partner and were aged 18 years or older; dependent children were excluded from the analysis, regardless of age. The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters research database for the 10 years ending December 31, 2016, was used as the basis for the analysis. The analysis was completed using the lifetest procedure available in version 9.4 of the SAS Software System for Windows. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to produce retention rates. A log-rank test with chi-square statistic was used to determine statistically significant differences between pairs of curves. RESULTS: The study found that the subscriber retention for the rare medical condition cohort is significantly higher than the all-subscribers cohort by at least 12 points at each 1-year period. The finding was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) for the self-insured and fully insured cohorts. At year 5, approximately 20% more of the rare medical condition cohort was retained as compared with the all-subscribers cohort regardless of payer type. In addition, the study found that the probability of retention for adults with each rare medical condition in the rare disease cohort was also statistically significantly higher than all subscribers regardless of payer type. CONCLUSIONS: In multiyear payment arrangements, it may be important to set expectations for member retention based on studies specific to particular member cohorts. Health insurers and plan administrators may have inaccurate expectations if standard assumptions based on all member populations are used. This study found that adults diagnosed with 1 of 7 rare medical conditions are retained longer, on average, than all adult subscribers. DISCLOSURES: Milliman received funding from bluebird bio for the conduct of this study and fees from AveXis, outside the submitted work. Jackson, Runyan, and Metz are employed by Milliman. Jackson and Metz are members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the qualification standards for performing the analyses in this report. Kenney is an independent managed care consultant and received consulting fees from Milliman during the conduct of this study; Kenney also serves as preceptor for the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, is immediate past president of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, and is a member of the Massachusetts Pharmacists Association Legislative Committee.

The Tiered Pharmacy Benefit: Challenges in Today's Health Care Market.

DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this reflection. The author has nothing to disclose.

Capture of biologic and biosimilar dispensings in a consortium of U.S.-based claims databases: Utilization of national drug codes and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System modifiers in medical claims.

PURPOSE: To assess the capture of biologics (originator and biosimilar) in the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) Distributed Research Network (DRN), with a focus on medical claim National Drug Code (NDC), a new data field, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) modifier. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study among patients with medical and pharmacy benefits enrolled in insurance plans participating in the BBCIC DRN between 1 January 2013 and 30 September 2017. We calculated the proportion of medical claims with ≥1 NDC and identified select biologics using four different approaches: (a) specific HCPCS alone, (b) specific HCPCS and NDC, (c) non-specific HCPCS with NDC, and (d) HCPCS with modifiers (applicable to biosimilars). Numbers of dispensings were calculated for each biologic by approach and select patient and claim characteristics. RESULTS: More than 1.5 million eligible participants contributed approximately 4 million person-years of data, including 1.2 billion medical claims. The proportion of medical claims with ≥1 NDC increased from 1.2% in 2013 to 3.0% in 2017. Medical claim NDCs identified 39% and 28% of vedolizumab dispensed in 2014 and 2015 and 30% of Epogen/Procrit dispensed overall. Out of 26,381 filgrastim biosimilar dispensings identified, 51% had a HCPCS modifier and 12% had a medical claim NDC for Zarxio. HCPCS modifiers and medical claim NDCs were present for 38% and 3% of all infliximab biosimilars dispensed (total n = 1,244). CONCLUSIONS: Medical claim NDC and HCPCS modifier improves identification of select biologics without product-specific HCPCS code, thereby facilitating product-specific biologic research.

Outcomes-Based Contracting for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Necessary Conditions for Paradigm Adoption.

BACKGROUND: In therapeutic areas with uncertainty regarding clinical outcomes that are dependent on high-cost specialty medications, outcomes-based contracts can be a tool to reduce financial risk for payers and for drug manufacturers. With a high treatment cost, large number of therapy choices, and variability of responses to therapy across patients, multiple sclerosis is a compelling therapeutic area to support outcomes-based contracts. OBJECTIVE: To identify the necessary conditions to support the widespread adoption of outcomes-based contracts for high-cost drug therapy, with a focus on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We conducted a series of in-depth, semi-structured phone interviews during fall 2018 with 17 healthcare stakeholders representing payers, manufacturers, and industry consultants, all of whom had some involvement in outcomes-based contract development or evaluation. The qualitative data management program from QSR International, N-VIVO 11, was used to store, organize, categorize, analyze, and produce visualization tools to explore, map ideas, and understand themes from the data. RESULTS: Overall, payers and manufacturers agreed that outcomes-based contracts are an effective vehicle to mitigate financial risk and deliver value for disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis, but they noted that the widespread adoption of outcomes-based contracts was tempered by 5 broad categories of challenges, including data-related issues, outcome measurement and confounding factors, regulatory barriers, levels of risk mitigation, and patient adherence. The majority of participants were receptive to using blood-based clinical biomarkers as outcomes-based contract end points, as long as the biomarkers are validated, accurately predict clinical outcomes, are well-established in the therapeutic area, and are readily accessible to various stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate there is general support from payers and drug manufacturers to adopt outcomes-based contracts for disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. However, some conditions need to be met to allow their widespread adoption, including resolving data issues, ensuring patient adherence to therapy, having a level of risk mitigation that is significant for both parties to make the endeavor economically worthwhile, and fostering a supportive regulatory environment. Blood-based clinical biomarkers that meet certain criteria could be viable end points in outcomes-based contract for disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis and can address many of the necessary conditions regarding data issues, including timeliness.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously known as primary biliary cirrhosis and which has been designated an orphan condition, is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in the destruction of the small bile ducts in the liver. Without effective treatment, disease progression frequently leads to liver failure and death. Until May 2016, the only FDA-approved treatment for PBC was ursodiol (UDCA), an oral hydrophilic bile acid, which can slow progression of liver damage due to PBC. However, 1 out of 3 patients taking UDCA has an inadequate biochemical response, leading to increased risk of disease progression, liver transplantation, and mortality. Given this unmet clinical need, new therapies are in development for the treatment of PBC. To provide pharmacists with an overview of the latest research on the pathophysiology of PBC and potential new treatment options and to highlight medical and specialty pharmacy approaches to managing access to drugs to treat orphan diseases such as PBC, a 2-hour satellite symposium was presented in conjunction with the 2015 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus meeting. Although obeticholic acid was approved by the FDA for the treatment of PBC in May 2016, this development occurred after the symposium presentation. The symposium was supported by an independent educational grant from Intercept Pharmaceuticals and was managed by Analysis Group. Robert Navarro, PharmD, moderated the CPE-accredited symposium titled "Medical and Specialty Pharmacy Management Update on Primary Biliary Cirrhosis." Expert panelists included Christopher L. Bowlus, MD; James T. Kenney, RPh, MBA; and Gary Rice, RPh, MS, MBA, CSP. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the educational satellite symposium presentations and discussions. SUMMARY: Autoimmune liver diseases, including PBC, are responsible for 15% of all liver transplants performed and an equal percentage of deaths related to liver disease. UDCA is the only FDA-approved therapy for treatment of PBC and is considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, many patients do not respond to UDCA, creating the need for new therapeutic options to improve clinical outcomes for PBC patients with inadequate response to treatment. While several agents are being studied in combination with UDCA, monotherapy with the novel agent obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has also shown promising results. Health plans are anticipated to assign any newly introduced therapy for the treatment of PBC to specialty pharmacy given its orphan disease status. This assignment enables the health plan to receive disease education, which is particularly important when new drugs are indicated for orphan diseases, and assistance with designing appropriate prior authorization criteria. The clinical value of any new therapeutic options that will inform formulary decisions and prior authorization criteria will be assessed based on evidence of efficacy, safety, and tolerability, among other factors, such as the potential to reduce or delay medical resource utilization (e.g., liver transplant). Key considerations for prior authorization of a new therapy will be determining which PBC patients are appropriate candidates for the new therapy and developing criteria for that determination. These are likely to include clinical diagnostic criteria and degree of response to prior treatment with UDCA. Initially, any new therapy would likely be positioned as noncovered until appropriate prior authorization criteria are established. CONCLUSIONS: PBC is a chronic liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a significant burden on the health care system if the disease progresses to the point at which a liver transplant is needed. Although UDCA, the current standard of care, has improved outcomes for many patients, others have an inadequate response to this treatment. This symposium discussed these issues and also addressed the overall treatment paradigm for orphan drug therapies, key implications for patient management, and the role of specialty pharmacy management and any associated needs both in general and specifically for new therapeutic options for PBC.

Integrin-mediated regulation of epidermal wound functions.

During cutaneous wound healing, keratinocyte proliferation and migration are critical for re-epithelialization. In addition the epidermis secretes growth factors, cytokines, proteases, and matricellular proteins into the wound microenvironment that modify the extracellular matrix and stimulate other wound cells that control the inflammatory response, promote angiogenesis and facilitate tissue contraction and remodeling. Wound keratinocytes express at least seven different integrins-the major cell adhesion receptors for the extracellular matrix-that collectively control essential cell-autonomous functions to ensure proper re-epithelialization, including migration, proliferation, survival and basement membrane assembly. Moreover, it has become evident in recent years that some integrins can regulate paracrine signals from wound epidermis that stimulate other wound cells involved in angiogenesis, contraction and inflammation. Importantly, it is likely that abnormal integrin expression or function in the epidermis contributes to wound pathologies such as over-exuberant healing (e.g., hypertrophic scar formation) or diminished healing (e.g., chronic wounds). In this review, we discuss current knowledge of integrin function in the epidermis, which implicates them as attractive therapeutic targets to promote wound healing or treat wound pathologies. We also discuss challenges that arise from the complex roles that multiple integrins play in wound epidermis, which may be regulated through extracellular matrix remodeling that determines ligand availability. Indeed, understanding how different integrin functions are temporally coordinated in wound epidermis and which integrin functions go awry in pathological wounds, will be important to determine how best to target them clinically to achieve maximum therapeutic benefit. Graphical abstract In addition to their well-characterized roles in keratinocyte adhesion, migration and wound re-epithelialization, epidermal integrins play important roles in modifying the wound microenvironment by regulating the expression and secretion of growth factors, extracellular proteases, and matricellular proteins that stimulate other wound cells, including vascular endothelial cells and fibroblasts/myofibroblasts.

Supportive Care of the First 2 Ebola Virus Disease Patients at the Monrovia Medical Unit.

We describe the first 2 patients admitted to the Monrovia Medical Unit, a facility established to treat Liberian and international response workers with suspected or known Ebola virus disease (EVD). Their recoveries illustrate the value of local point-of-care diagnostics, parenteral therapies, and electrolyte replacement in EVD supportive care.

Defining Value in Cancer Care: AVBCC 2013 Steering Committee Report.

The AVBCC Annual Meeting experiences exponential growth in attendance and participation as oncologists, payers, employers, managed care executives, patient advocates, and drug manufacturers convened in Hollywood, FL, on May 2-5, 2013, for the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care (AVBCC). The conference presented an all-inclusive open forum for stakeholder dialogue and integration across the cancer care continuum, facilitating an open dialogue among the various healthcare stakeholders to align their perspectives around the urgent need to address value in cancer care, costs, patient education, safety, outcomes, and quality. The AVBCC 2013 Steering Committee was held on the first day of the conference to define value in cancer care. The committee was divided into 7 groups, each representing a key stakeholder in oncology. The goal of the Steering Committee was to define value from the particular point of view of each of the stakeholder groups and to suggest how that particular perspective can contribute to the value proposition in oncology, by balancing cost, quality, and access to care to improve overall patient outcomes. The following summary highlights the major points addressed by each group.

Managing the evolving complexity of pharmacologic treatment: comparative effectiveness research, pharmacoeconomic data analyses, and other decision support tools.

Eleven classes of antidiabetic medicines are now available to help the 25.8 million Americans with type 2 diabetes control their blood sugar levels when diet and lifestyle modifications are not sufficient. Although patients benefit from the myriad of treatment options, there are little comparative data to effectively differentiate the products and predict their relative utility. In the absence of true comparative outcomes data, comparative effectiveness research (CER) provides a valuable tool to compare the safety and efficacy of agents and applies the results to heterogeneous patient populations, including patients ordinarily excluded from randomized controlled trials. Thus, CER provides more generalizable results that better reflect real-world situations faced by practitioners and patients. In addition to traditional CER approaches such as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and retrospective claims analyses, Markov modeling and Bayesian analysis can be applied to predict patient outcomes in scenarios in which clinical trials are not feasible. CER may be the best way to consolidate and interpret data on the many agents involved and thereby guide rational treatment decisions.

Evaluation of growth based rapid microbiological methods for sterility testing of vaccines and other biological products.

Most biological products, including vaccines, administered by the parenteral route are required to be tested for sterility at the final container and also at various stages during manufacture. The sterility testing method described in the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 610.12) and the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP, Chapter <71>) is based on the observation of turbidity in liquid culture media due to growth of potential contaminants. We evaluated rapid microbiological methods (RMM) based on detection of growth 1) by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence technology (Rapid Milliflex(®) Detection System [RMDS]), and 2) by CO(2) monitoring technologies (BacT/Alert and the BACTEC systems), as alternate sterility methods. Microorganisms representing Gram negative, Gram positive, aerobic, anaerobic, spore forming, slow growing bacteria, yeast, and fungi were prepared in aliquots of Fluid A or a biological matrix (including inactivated influenza vaccines) to contain approximately 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 colony forming units (CFU) in an inoculum of 10 ml. These preparations were inoculated to the specific media required for the various methods: 1) fluid thioglycollate medium (FTM) and tryptic soy broth (TSB) of the compendial sterility method (both membrane filtration and direct inoculation); 2) tryptic soy agar (TSA), Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and Schaedler blood agar (SBA) of the RMDS; 3) iAST and iNST media of the BacT/Alert system and 4) Standard 10 Aerobic/F and Standard Anaerobic/F media of the BACTEC system. RMDS was significantly more sensitive in detecting various microorganisms at 0.1CFU than the compendial methods (p<0.05), whereas the compendial membrane filtration method was significantly more sensitive than the BACTEC and BacT/Alert methods (p<0.05). RMDS detected all microorganisms significantly faster than the compendial method (p<0.05). BacT/Alert and BACTEC methods detected most microorganisms significantly faster than the compendial method (p<0.05), but took almost the same time to detect the slow growing microorganism P. acnes, compared to the compendial method. RMDS using SBA detected all test microorganisms in the presence of a matrix containing preservative 0.01% thimerosal, whereas the BacT/Alert and BACTEC systems did not consistently detect all the test microorganisms in the presence of 0.01% thimerosal. RMDS was compatible with inactivated influenza vaccines and aluminum phosphate or aluminum hydroxide adjuvants at up to 8 mg/ml without any interference in bioluminescence. RMDS was shown to be acceptable as an alternate sterility method taking 5 days as compared to the 14 days required of the compendial method. Isolation of microorganisms from the RMDS was accomplished by re-incubation of membranes with fresh SBA medium and microbial identification was confirmed using the MicroSEQ Identification System. BacT/Alert and BACTEC systems may be applicable as alternate methods to the compendial direct inoculation sterility method for products that do not contain preservatives or anti-microbial agents.