Suicide Screening in a Large Pediatric Emergency Department: Results, Feasibility, and Lessons Learned.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the feasibility of screening all patients entering the ED using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale as well as examining the rates of suicide ideation and attempts endorsed by adolescents who present at the ED. METHODS: This study used a sample of 12,113 patients between the ages of 11 and 19 years. RESULTS: Results revealed that 13.5% of the participants endorsed passive suicide ideation in the month leading up to their ED visit and 11.3% of the participants reported active ideation in the prior month. Results also revealed that patients whose chief complaints were coded as psychiatric or medical trauma were more likely to endorse either active or passive suicidal ideation than other presenting problems. Patients with a psychiatric or medical trauma chief complaint were also more likely to report lifetime suicidal behavior and suicidal behavior 3 months before the ED visit. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to findings, implications, feasibility, and lessons learned are discussed for other institutions or departments considering implementation of a widespread screening.Highlights:• Suicide screenings were implemented in a large pediatric emergency department.• One in 5 endorsed suicidal ideation or behavior regardless of presenting problem.• Feasibility and lessons learned are discussed for others hoping to implement a widespread screening.

Rapidly building surge capacity within a pandemic response using simulation-based clinical systems testing.

Introduction: As the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread across the globe, hospitals around the USA began preparing for its arrival. Building on previous experience with alternative care sites (ACS) during surge events, Texas Children's Hospital (TCH) opted to redeploy their mobile paediatric emergency response teams. Simulation-based clinical systems testing (SbCST) uses simulation to test preoccupancy spaces and new processes. We developed rapid SbCST with social distancing for our deployed ACS, with collaboration between emergency management, paediatric emergency medicine and the simulation team. Methods: A two-phased approach included an initial virtual tabletop activity followed by SbCST at each campus, conducted simultaneously in-person and virtually. These activities were completed while also respecting the need for social distancing amidst a pandemic response. Each activity's discussion was facilitated using Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) for systems integration debriefing methodology and was followed by compilation of a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), which was then disseminated to campus leaders. Results: Within a 2-week period, participants from 20 different departments identified 109 latent safety threats (LSTs) across the four activities, with 71 identified as being very high or high priority items. Very high and high priority threats were prioritised in mitigation efforts by hospital leadership. Discussion: SbCST can be rapidly implemented to hone pandemic responses and identify LSTs. We used SbCST to allow for virtual participation and social distancing within a rapidly accelerated timeline. With prioritised FMEA reporting, leadership was able to mitigate concerns surrounding the four Ss of surge capacity: staff, stuff, structure and systems.

Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations.

AIM: Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing of resuscitations to improve clinical performance. We implemented a novel standardized debriefing program using a Debriefing In Situ Conversation after Emergent Resuscitation Now (DISCERN) tool. METHODS: Following the development of the evidence-based DISCERN tool, we conducted an observational study of all resuscitations (intubation, CPR, and/or defibrillation) at a pediatric emergency department (ED) over one year. Resuscitation interventions, patient survival, and physician team leader characteristics were analyzed as predictors for debriefing. Each debriefing's participants, time duration, and content were recorded. Thematic content of debriefings was categorized by framework approach into Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) elements. RESULTS: There were 241 resuscitations and 63 (26%) debriefings. A higher proportion of debriefings occurred after CPR (p<0.001) or ED death (p<0.001). Debriefing participants always included an attending and nurse; the median number of staff roles present was six. Median intervals (from resuscitation end to start of debriefing) & debriefing durations were 33 (IQR 15, 67) and 10 min (IQR 5, 12), respectively. Common TEAM themes included co-operation/coordination (30%), communication (22%), and situational awareness (15%). Stated reasons for not debriefing included: unnecessary (78%), time constraints (19%), or other reasons (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Debriefings with the DISCERN tool usually involved higher acuity resuscitations, involved most of the indicated personnel, and lasted less than 10 min. Future studies are needed to evaluate the tool for adaptation to other settings and potential impacts on education, quality improvement programming, and staff emotional well-being.