The effect of pharmacological treatment in combination with vitamin K on healing in an experimental rat model of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the effects of teriparatide, zoledronic acid, and their combination therapy with vitamin K on osteoporotic rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided a total of 50 female Sprague-Dawley rats into five groups: A (the control group), B and D (the teriparatide group), and C and E (the zoledronic acid group). Following ovariectomy and subcutaneous heparin administration at a dose of 2 IU/kg for four weeks, osteoporosis was created. Groups A, B, and C were fed with standard feed, while Groups D and E were fed with vitamin K-rich feed. After four weeks of treatment, sacrification was performed. The right and left femurs were separated for histopathological and biomechanical evaluation, respectively. For histopathological evaluation, the femurs were decalcified, and the sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated under a light microscope. Fracture healing was evaluated using the classification system as described previously. For biomechanical evaluation, the 3-point stress test and torsion stress test were applied to 10 femurs from each group. RESULTS: Groups B-E were histopathologically and biomechanically superior to Group A in fracture healing of osteoporotic rats; however, it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The group that received additional vitamin K was histopathologically and biomechanically superior to the group which was fed with standard feed, although it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study results indicated that both teriparatide and zoledronic acid had beneficial effects on osteoporotic fractures with comparable histological and biochemical results. Vitamin K promoted teriparatide and zoledronic acid treatment on osteoporotic fracture healing. Based on these findings, combination therapies may yield the most optimal results in biomechanical and histological examinations.

Effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of plantar fasciitis.

ABSTRACT: Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel pain. Pain can be persistent in some patients and interrupt daily activities and sportive activities. There are a lot of treatment options available for plantar fasciitis. We hypothesized that patients with chronic persistent plantar fasciitis can be successfully treated with radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFNA).Two hundred sixty-one patients with plantar fasciitis (378 feet) treated with RFNA from February 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively assessed. All the patients had plantar heel pain for at least 6months. Based on their body mass index (BMI), the enrolled patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30kg/m2) groups. The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire just before and after the procedure and during the final follow-up. The BNS Radiofrequency Lesion Generator was used during a single session. The patients' information, including their visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, was assessed. During their final follow-up, the patients were asked to rate the success of their treatment by choosing one of the following options: completely successful, very successful, moderately successful, marginally successful, or not successful.The VAS and AOFAS scores of all the patients were evaluated pre-procedure, in the first month after procedure, and during the final follow-up (8-24 months). There was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure and postprocedure VAS scores (P < .001), there was no statistically significant difference between the VAS scores in the first month postprocedure and during the final follow-up.There was a statistically significant difference between the pre-procedure and postprocedure AOFAS scores (P < .001), there was no statistically significant difference between the AOFAS scores in the first month postprocedure and during the final follow-up.RFNA can be used as an alternative method to surgical procedures for treating plantar fasciitis because it is safe and effective. The advantages of RFNA are that patients can quickly return to their work and resume weight-bearing activities.

A comparison of double single suture-button fixation, suture-button fixation, and screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injury: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: Different methods have been used throughout the years for syndesmotic injury but there is no consensus on the ideal treatment. Some methods are expensive and some have more complications. The aim of this study is to compare single suture endobutton with double suture endobutton and screw fixation for syndesmotic injury.Sixty nine patients with syndesmotic injury with fibular fractures whom were treated with a single interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTightTM, Zimmer Biomet), a double interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTightTM, Zimmer Biomet) and 1 syndesmotic screw (TST, Istanbul, Turkey) were included in this study. Functional and radiological results from patient records between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.Twenty patients were treated with the double interosseous suture endobutton, 23 were treated with the single interosseous suture endobutton, and 26 were treated with traditional AO screw fixation. Three patients from the screw fixation group (11.5%) required revision surgery (P < .05). All the radiologic and clinical outcomes were statistical similar in all 3 groups.Our findings showed that the interosseous suture endobutton system is at least as safe as the screw fixation technique for treatment of syndesmosis joint injuries and can be used as an alternative to the screw method. The interosseous suture endobutton system eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove the hardware, which minimizes the probability of re-diastasis. Since our results showed no statistical difference between single and double interosseous suture endobutton systems, the less costly single endobutton system may be the better alternative.