Generation of dendritic cells from bone marrow progenitors using GM-CSF, TNF-alpha, and additional cytokines: antagonistic effects of IL-4 and IFN-gamma and selective involvement of TNF-alpha receptor-1.

We report the generation of dendritic cells (DC) starting from CD34+ bone marrow (BM) progenitor cells, using a two-stage culture system in which, besides granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), stem-cell factor (SCF) was added during the first 5 days, while interleukin-4 (IL-4) and/or interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) were added during the secondary culture period of 9 days. Addition of IL-4 favoured the outgrowth of CD1a+, HLA-DR+, CD4+, CD40+, CD80+ but CD14- cells with dendritic morphology and strong antigen-presenting capacity. Addition of IFN-gamma selectively induced HLA-DR and CD86 but did not up-regulate CD1a expression or antigen-presenting capacity of the differentiated cells. An antagonism between IL-4 and IFN-gamma could further be confirmed in that, as compared with IL-4 alone, the simultaneous addition of IL-4 and IFN-gamma to GM-CSF plus TNF-alpha during maturation reduced both the phenotypical (CD1a, CD4, CD40) and functional characteristics of DC. Using receptor-specific TNF-alpha mutants, we investigated the relative involvement of TNF-alpha receptors R1 and R2 in the generation of DC. The induction of CD1a and HLA-DR, as well as the increase in allostimulatory capacity were dependent on TNF-R1 triggering, whereas triggering through TNF-R2 had no measurable effect. We conclude first, that the expansion of DC from BM progenitors could most effectively be enhanced in a two-stage culture assay using SCF, GM-CSF, TNF-alpha and IL-4; second, that the effect of TNF-alpha in DC generation involves signalling via the TNF-R1 receptor; and third, that IFN-gamma counteracts some of the effects of IL-4 in DC generation.

Costimulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells through CD26: the ADA-binding epitope is not essential for complete signaling.

It was previously shown that CD26 (DPP IV, EC 3.4.14.5) is a binding site for adenosine deaminase (ADA, EC 3.5.4.4) on T cells and that costimulation by some anti-CD26 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and anti-CD3 induces CD4+ T cell proliferation. The CD26 epitopes involved in costimulation, the precise sequence of the events preceding proliferation, and the response of CD8+ compared with CD4+ T cells to CD26 were not extensively studied. We therefore compared the effects of the novel TA5.9 anti-CD26 mAb, recognizing an ADA-binding epitope, and the clearly distinct anti-Ta1 reference anti-CD26 mAb for their costimulatory properties in various T cell subsets. Both purified CD4+ and CD8+ T cells proliferated upon costimulation with anti-CD3 and either anti-CD26 mAb, but anti-TA5.9 mAb induced a more potent response than anti-Ta1. Either anti-CD26 mAb, together with anti-CD3, caused a similar sequential up-regulation of CD69, CD25 (IL-2R alpha), and CD71 (transferrin receptor) expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The activation markers appeared faster on the CD45R0+ than on the CD45R0- subsets. After costimulation, CD4+ T cell cultures contained significant amounts of the Th1 cytokines IL-2, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). In CD8+ T cell cultures relatively more IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha but almost no IL-2 was measured after triggering of CD3 and CD26. Our data demonstrate that the recognition of the ADA-binding epitope is not a prerequisite for the costimulatory capacity of anti-CD26 mAbs. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and their CD45R0- and CD45R0+ subsets are sensitive to various aspects of activation via CD26, but the magnitude and/or kinetics differ according to the anti-CD26 used and the T cell subset studied.

Increased cytolytic T lymphocyte activity and decreased B7 responsiveness are associated with CD28 down-regulation on CD8+ T cells from HIV-infected subjects.

The CD28 receptor on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells interacts with B7 molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APC) to generate essential costimulatory signals. The cytolytic potential of CD8+ T cells could be linked to CD28 expression. Since HIV induces dysfunction of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, we evaluated CD28 expression and function in both subsets during HIV infection. CD28 expression on CD8+ T cells from HIV+ subjects was strongly reduced in a disease stage-related fashion. CD28- CD8+ T cells preferentially expressed CD57 and CD11b, but lacked CD26 and IL-2R alpha. The CD8+ T cells from the patients showed a significantly reduced proliferative response to co-stimulation with cell-bound anti-CD3 and B7. Nevertheless, when stimulated with plate-fixed anti-CD3, CD8+ T cells from HIV-infected subjects proliferated normally, and normal levels of IL-2R alpha and transferrin-receptor could be induced on CD28- CD8+ T cells from the patients. In addition, stimulation with plate-fixed anti-CD3 induced proliferative responses in highly purified CD28- CD8+ T cells from both HIV- and HIV+ persons. Furthermore, the increased cytotoxic activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from HIV+ subjects, measured in an anti-CD3 redirected assay, was predominantly exerted by CD28- CD57+ T cells. CD4+ T cells from the patients showed a slight but significant CD28 down-regulation and were slightly hyporesponsive to B7 co-stimulation. Decrease of CD28 on CD8+ T cells from HIV+ subjects is associated with an impaired response to co-stimulation via B7. CD28- CD8+ T cells from seropositives, however, are not completely inert, since they contain in vivo activated CTL and they can be additionally activated through a B7-independent stimulation.