Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Refract Surg ; 22(9): 906-10, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17124887

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term complications of two outdated phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL) implanted in eyes with high myopia to aid development of better PIOL designs. METHODS: Sixty-two eyes of 37 patients implanted with the ZB5M anterior chamber PIOL (anterior chamber group) and 22 eyes of 14 patients implanted with Fyodorov's posterior chamber PIOL (posterior chamber group) were examined. Complications were compared after a mean follow-up of 71.15 +/- 32.17 months (range: 24 to 145 months) in the anterior chamber group and 84.14 +/- 26.43 months (range: 24 to 132 months) in the posterior chamber group (P = .07). RESULTS: At last follow-up, pupil ovalization was present in 32 (51.6%) eyes in the anterior chamber group and 1 (4.5%) eye in the posterior chamber group (P < .001), and cataract in 5 (8.1%) eyes in the anterior chamber group and 7 (31.8%) eyes in the posterior chamber group (P = .007). Phakic intraocular lens decentration, glaucoma, retinal detachment, corneal decomposition, and monocular diplopia were additional complications encountered in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Proper understanding of these outdated PIOLs may be helpful in developing better PIOL designs.


Assuntos
Câmara Anterior/cirurgia , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Cristalino/fisiologia , Lentes Intraoculares , Miopia/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...