Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology guideline

This document represents an update of the British Society for Haematology (BSH) guideline on myelofibrosis (MF) first published in 2012 and updated in 2015.1 This guideline aims to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of primary my-elofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-polycythaemia vera myelo-fibrosis (post-PV MF) and post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF). A section on prefibrotic MF is also included. A separate BSH Guideline covers the manage-ment of MF and is published alongside this guideline.

The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology guideline

This document represents an update of the British Society for Haematology guideline on Myelofibrosis first published in 2012 and updated in 2015 These guidelines aim to pro-vide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on stratified management for primary myelofibrosis (PMF), as well as post-polycythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) and postessential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF). A separate BSH guideline covers the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of myelofibrosis and is published alongside this guideline

Predicting cytopenias, progression, and survival in patients with clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Somatic mutations are frequently reported in individuals with cytopenia but without a confirmed haematological diagnosis (clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance; CCUS). These patients have an increased risk of progression to a myeloid malignancy and worse overall survival than those with no such mutations. To date, studies have been limited by retrospective analysis or small patient numbers. We aimed to establish the natural history of CCUS by prospectively investigating outcome in a large, well defined patient cohort. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, a diagnostic laboratory in Leeds, UK. Patients aged at least 18 years who were referred for investigation of cytopenia were eligible for inclusion; those with a history of myeloid malignancy were not eligible. Targeted sequencing was conducted alongside routine clinical testing. Baseline mutation analysis was then correlated with the main study outcomes: longitudinal blood counts, disease progression to a myeloid malignancy, and overall survival with a median follow-up of 4·54 years (IQR 4·03-5·04). Data were collected manually from hospital records or extracted from laboratory or clinical outcome databases. FINDINGS: Bone marrow samples from 2348 patients were received at the Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service between July 1, 2014, and July 31, 2016. Of these, 2083 patients (median age 72 years [IQR 63-80, range 18-99]; 854 [41·0%] female and 1229 [59·0%] male) met the inclusion criteria and had samples of sufficient quality for further analysis. 598 (28·7%) patients received a diagnosis on the basis of their biopsy sample, whereas 1485 (71·3%) samples were classified as non-diagnostic; of these, CCUS was confirmed in 400 (26·9%) patients (256 [64·0%] male and 144 [36·0%] female). TET2, SRSF2, and DNMT3A were the most frequently mutated genes in patients with CCUS, with 320 (80%) of 400 patients harbouring a mutation in at least one of these genes. Age (p<0·0001), sex (p=0·0027), and mutations in ASXL1 (p=0·0009), BCOR (p=0·0056), and TP53 (p=0·0055) correlated with a worse overall survival; however, the number of mutations was the strongest predictor for progression to a myeloid malignancy (two mutations, p=0·0024; three or more mutations, p=0·0004). Extended sequencing of samples from a subgroup of patients with sequential samples and no mutations in the initial myeloid gene panel showed recurrent mutations in both DDX41 and UBA1, suggesting that these genes should be included in clinical test panels. INTERPRETATION: Mutation analysis is advised in patients who have undergone bone marrow examination and have an otherwise-unexplained cytopenia. High-risk genetic mutations and increased numbers of mutations are predictive of both survival and progression within 5 years of presentation, warranting clinical surveillance and, when necessary, intervention. FUNDING: MDS Foundation.

Clinical, histopathological and molecular characterization of hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome.

Diagnostic criteria for hypoplastic myelodysplasic syndrome (h-MDS) have not been clearly established, making the differential diagnosis from other bone marrow failure syndromes (BMF) challenging. In this study, we aimed to delineate clinical, histopathological, and molecular features of h-MDS, based on a large and well-annotated cohort of patients with bone marrow (BM) hypocellularity. The study included 534 consecutive adult patients with hypocellular BM (278 h-MDS and 136 aplastic anemia), and 727 with normo- or hypercellular MDS (n-MDS). Comparison of clinical features of patients with h-MDS as defined by BM cellularity ≤25% (n = 204) or reduced age-adjusted cellularity (n = 74) did not reveal significant differences. We developed a diagnostic score to discriminate h-MDS from non-malignant BMF based on histological and cytological variables with the highest specificity for MDS (h-score). The information from chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutation patterns was then integrated into a cyto-histological/genetic score (hg-score). This score was able to segregate two groups of h-MDS with a significantly different risk of blast progression (P < 0.001). The integration of cyto-histological and genetic features in adult patients with hypocellular BM facilitated segregation into two distinct groups, one with clinical and genetic features highly consistent with myeloid neoplasm, and one with features more consistent with non-malignant BMF.

Immunological Consequences of JAK Inhibition: Friend or Foe?

Over the last decade, unparalleled advances have been made within the field of 'Philadelphia chromosome'-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) regarding both disease pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting. The discovery of deregulated JAK-STAT signalling in MPN led to the rapid development of JAK inhibitor agents, targeting both mutated and wild-type JAK, which have significantly altered the therapeutic paradigm for patients with MPN. Although the largest population treated with these agents incorporates those with myelofibrosis, increasing data supports potential usage in other MPNs such as essential thromocythaemia and polycythaemia vera. Many MPNs are associated with a hyperinflammatory state and deregulation of immune homeostasis. Over the last few years, research has focused on attempting to decipher the complex and context-dependent changes that contribute to this immune deregulation. Moreover, very recent studies have demonstrated significant JAK inhibitor-mediated effects within the T cell, natural killer cell and dendritic cell compartments following exposure to JAK inhibitors. In parallel, case reports of infections occurring following exposure to ruxolitinib, many of which are atypical, have focused research efforts on delineating JAK inhibitor-associated immunological consequences. Within this review article, we will describe what is currently known about MPN-associated immune deregulation and JAK inhibitor-mediated immunomodulation.

Targeting of the Hedgehog pathway in myeloid malignancies: still a worthy chase?

Deregulated Hedgehog (Hh) signalling activity may be associated with a broad range of cancer types and hence has become an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. Although initial haematological interest focused on the therapeutic targeting of this pathway in chronic myeloid leukaemia), small molecule inhibitors targeting the Hh pathway are now being tested in a range of other myeloid disorders, including myelofibrosis, myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukaemia. In this review we will evaluate the rationale for targeting of the Hh pathway in myeloid diseases and discuss the novel agents that have entered the clinical arena. We will discuss pre-clinical models, emerging clinical trial data, and suggest how these targeted therapies may address current unmet medical needs. Finally, we will explore potential limitations of these therapies due to the emergence of secondary resistance mechanisms and speculate on future developments within this arena.