Wait-and-see policy versus cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones in high-risk patients with co-existing gallbladder stones: a prospective randomised trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is one of the most important advances in the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, the use of ES to remove CBD stones in high-risk patients without cholecystectomy is still debatable. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a wait-and-see policy versus cholecystectomy after ES for CBD stones in high-risk patients with co-existing cholelithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 162 patients after undergoing ES with the clearance of CBD stones were randomised after informed consent to cholecystectomy or conservative management of their gallbladder stones. RESULTS: The results indicated that cholecystectomy after ES for CBD stones significantly reduced the biliary complications in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Every patient who has both CBD stones and gallstones with significant co-morbid illnesses, after clearance of CBD stones by ES, should undergo early cholecystectomy.

Hydatid cyst of the pancreas. An experience with six cases.

CONTEXT: The pancreas is an infrequent site of hydatid disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aims at giving better insight into the diagnostic and managerial approach to the disease. PATIENTS: Six patients with hydatid cysts of the pancreas. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the clinical records. RESULTS: The six patients (four men, two women) ranged in age from 18 to 68 years. Five of the cysts were primary while one had an associated cyst in the liver. Abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal mass and dyspeptic symptoms were seen in cysts involving the body and tail. Two patients having cysts in the head of the pancreas presented with obstructive jaundice. An indirect hemagglutination test and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay were positive for the presence of specific hydatid antibodies in four patients. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) successfully imaged the cysts and also defined the relationship of the lesion with the pancreatic duct. All patients underwent surgical exploration. Three patients had intraoperative fine needle aspiration cytology of the cystic lesion for microscopic and electrolyte analysis. A preoperative diagnosis was possible in two patients and, in the other four, the diagnosis was made intraoperatively and confirmed on histopathological examination. PATIENTS: with cysts located in the tail underwent a distal pancreatectomy with a splenectomy while those with cysts in the body had a pericystectomy or central pancreatectomy. Cysts of the head were treated with evacuation, partial cystectomy and tube drainage. There were no postoperative complications, and no evidence of cyst recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. All the patients were followed up at three-month intervals with a mean follow-up time of 58.7 months (rang: 4-120 months); no patient had cyst recurrence or dissemination. CONCLUSION: A hydatid cyst is an uncommon cause of cystic lesions in the pancreas and should be included in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas, especially in endemic areas. Intraoperative fine needle aspirate for microscopic and electrolyte estimation seems to be an effective method for establishing a proper diagnosis. MRCP, which can depict the communication of the cystic lesion with the pancreatic duct, helps in defining the type of surgical treatment. Cysts in body and tail are best treated by resectional methods whereas, for those in the head region, a cystectomy with simple drainage is a simple, quick and effective solution.

Effect of bending exercise on gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Recumbency and bending are thought to provoke symptoms of reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The effect of exercise which involved bending and abdominal contractions was evaluated in symptomatic patients of GERD using continuous 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH test. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with GERD, confirmed by abnormal 24-hour esophageal pH study, performed exercise for 30 minutes consisting of 5 sessions of 6 minutes each. The exercise involved toe touching from supine, sitting and standing position of 2 minutes' duration each. Each 2 minutes' period included 8 repetitions of the same exercise of 15 seconds' duration. 24-hour esophageal pHmetry was done on day 1 without exercise and on day 2 with 30-minute exercise. Reflux time percent (RT%) pH <4 was compared between days 1 and 2 and 30 minutes before and during exercise. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were upright refluxers and 11 patients were combined refluxers, which included 4 patients with supine reflux and 7 patients who refluxed both in supine and upright positions. The median (range) 24-hour RT% on day 1 and day 2 was 7 (5-40) and 7 (4-46), respectively (p=0.15). RT% during 30 minutes exercise compared with 30 minutes before exercise was 6.6 (0-60) and 0.0 (0.0-80) (p=0.02), respectively. In combined and upright refluxers, RT% during and before exercise was 13 (0-53) and 0.0 (0.0-42) (p=0.008), respectively and 0.0 (0-60) and 0.0 (0-80), (p=0.71), respectively. RT% between upright and combined refluxers during exercise was 0.0 (0-60) and 13 (0-53), respectively (p=0.004). The mean (SD) LES pressure in mmHg in combined and upright refluxers was 7 (2.9) and 19.6 (6.8), respectively (p=0.008). Esophagitis in combined and upright refluxers was seen in 8 patients (72.7%) and 2 patients (14.3%), respectively. Two patients (8%) developed symptoms during exercise. CONCLUSION: Exercise which involves bending precipitates reflux in patients with moderate-to-severe GERD.