Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 66(9): 97-98, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321943

RESUMO

Miliary mottling is most commonly seen in tuberculosis. Clinical features of tuberculosis mimic many other lung diseases. Here we report a 40 yr old male with clinical features suggestive of tuberculosis, miliary mottling on skiagram chest and granulomatous hepatitis on histopathology. Case was finally diagnosed as sarcoidosis on liver biopsy and improved on oral corticosteroid.


Assuntos
Hepatite/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Miliar/diagnóstico , Corticosteroides , Adulto , Biópsia , Humanos , Masculino , Sarcoidose
2.
Indian J Occup Environ Med ; 21(2): 94-96, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29540971

RESUMO

Several occupational hazards, especially exposure to silica, have been implicated as causal factors for the development of scleroderma-like disorders. Compared to other connective tissue disorders, silica-associated systemic sclerosis (SA-SS) is relatively rare. Silica-induced scleroderma is indistinguishable from idiopathic systemic sclerosis. However, the former expresses a high predisposition of pulmonary involvement and anti-Scl-70 antibody. We report the case of a 42-year-old male, stone cutter by occupation, who was diagnosed as simple chronic silicosis and developed systemic sclerosis.

3.
Am J Ther ; 20(2): 154-62, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22926233

RESUMO

Leukotriene (LT) modifiers are anti-inflammatory drugs that are useful as an add-on therapy with first-line asthma-controller medications. This group includes LT synthesis inhibitors (eg, Zileuton) and receptor antagonists (eg, Montelukast), whose direct comparative clinical data are not available. This study was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of orally administered Zileuton extended-release (ER) with Montelukast sodium in patients suffering from chronic persistent asthma. Patients of 18-65 years of age with mild to moderate chronic stable asthma were randomized to treatment with Zileuton ER 2400 mg/d or Montelukast 10 mg/d for 12 weeks. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness, and shortness of breath each on a 4-point scale) were assessed on monthly scheduled out-patient visits. Safety assessments by clinical and laboratory parameters were carried out during the course of the study. Among 210 patients eligible for efficacy assessment, PEFR improved by 64.8 ± 52.8 (95% confidence interval: 54.8-74.7) L/min with Zileuton ER (n = 109) and 40.6 ± 47.5 (31.3-49.9) L/min with Montelukast (n = 101; P < 0.001), whereas percent improvements were 27.0% (22.6%-31.5%) versus 18.4% (14.1%-22.7%), respectively (P = 0.006). Zileuton ER lead to ≥12% PEFR improvements in 74 of 109 [67.9% (59.1%-76.7%)] patients, whereas the same was noted in 52 of 101 [51.5% (41.7%-61.2%)] patients receiving Montelukast (P = 0.015). The reduction in the mean overall symptom intensity score was also significantly better with Zileuton ER [-5.0 ± 2.1 (4.6-5.4) versus -4.2 ± 2.3 (3.8-4.7)] (P = 0.018); however, the same was not observed for the decline in the individual symptom scores. A lesser but not significantly different adverse event rate was reported in the Zileuton ER group than the Montelukast group with the commonest events being headache and gastrointestinal effects in both the groups. Thus, Zileuton ER seems to be more efficacious than Montelukast and well tolerated for the treatment of mild to moderate chronic persistent asthma in adult patient population. Further studies can elucidate the comparative treatment benefits of these LT modifiers in asthma management.


Assuntos
Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Hidroxiureia/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Acetatos/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Ciclopropanos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Feminino , Humanos , Hidroxiureia/administração & dosagem , Hidroxiureia/efeitos adversos , Hidroxiureia/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pico do Fluxo Expiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sulfetos , Comprimidos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 59: 424-8, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22315746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a common upper respiratory tract inflammation associated with a significant morbidity in all the age groups. Fluticasone furoate is a new potent topical glucocorticoid for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate (FF) nasal spray 110 microg/day with fluticasone propionate (FP) nasal spray 200 microg/day for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis in adult Indian patients. METHODS: Clinically symptomatic patients (n=220) with allergic rhinitis received treatment with FF or FP for 2 weeks in this comparative, open label, multicentric, clinical trial. Nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, and sneezing) and ocular symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and eye redness) were recorded on a 4-point categoric scale by the patients. The efficacy was assessed by the change in nasal and ocular symptom scores as their subtotals (Total Nasal Symptom Score and Total Ocular Symptom Score) and grand total (Total Symptom Score). RESULTS: FF produced significantly better improvement in Total Symptom Score (-10.4 +/- 3.2 vs. -8.9 +/- 3.5, p<0.005) and Total Nasal Symptom Score (-7.3 +/- 2.2 vs. -6.2 +/- 2.6, p<0.005) as compared to FP. Also a significantly larger percentage of patients achieved complete symptomatic relief with FF (45.3% vs. 31.4%, p<0.05). FF was also better tolerated than FP. CONCLUSION: FF nasal spray is significantly more effective and better tolerated than FP nasal spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in adult Indian patients.


Assuntos
Androstadienos/administração & dosagem , Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Androstadienos/efeitos adversos , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sprays Nasais , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA