An open clinical trial of benazepril--a new ACE inhibitor in mild-moderate hypertension.

Benazepril hydrochloride, a new non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor (ACEI) was studied in a titrated dose of 10 mg-20 mg once a day for 6 weeks in 42 mild to moderate adult hypertensive patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) 95-114 mm Hg. The pre-drug SDBP(mean +/- SE) of 102.5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg showed a significant reduction to 87.5 +/- 0.93 mm Hg at the end of treatment. BP was controlled (SDBP < or = 90 mm Hg) in 34 (81%) patients and a drop of at least 10 mm Hg from the pre-treatment SDBP value was noted in 34 (81%) patients. Common adverse reaction was cough in 8(19%) patients. Clinically significant changes in laboratory evaluations were not seen in any patient. Study showed that benazepril in a dose range of 10 to 20 mg per day is an effective agent for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Nifedipine, captopril, metoprolol and nifedipine with metoprolol in hypertensive crisis in non-intensive care setting.

In 102 cases of severe hypertension (DBP > or = 115 mm Hg), with or without acute complications, efficacy and safety of SL Nifedipine 10 mg (NIF), SL Captopril 25 mg (CAP), IV Metoprolol 15 mg (MET) and SL NIF + IV MET were studied in an inpatient trial. Maximum mean percent reduction in SBP was 13.3, 9.7, 15.7 and 19.9 and in DBP was 21.2, 13.9, 12.5 and 20.4 with NIF, CAP, MET and NIF + MET respectively. A safe DBP of < or = 110 mm Hg (Kaplan) was achieved in 90, 61, 72.2 and 95.2 percent of patients. A statistically significant fall in DBP was observed at 5 minutes with all regimens except CAP which was at 15 minutes. Mild side effects observed were palpitations and flushing (NIF n = 4), taste disturbances (CAP n = 3), heaviness of head (CAP n = 1) and giddiness (MET n = 2, NIF + MET n = 2). The trial data suggest that hypertensive crisis can be managed, without intensive care facility, with all four regimens; this implies significant cost containment.

Amlodipine in mild and moderate hypertension: initial Indian experience.

In an open, non-comparative, variable-dose study, 20 outpatients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were treated with 5-10 mg amlodipine once daily for 4 weeks, after their blood pressures had stabilized on placebo. Amlodipine produced a significant decrease in blood pressure (P < 0.05) from the initial mean of 162/100 mm Hg to 139/85 mm Hg at 4 weeks. 80% of the patients reached the goal diastolic blood pressure of < or = 90 mm Hg with a once-daily dose of 5 mg amlodipine within 2 weeks. The remaining 20% also attained the goal diastolic blood pressure within 4 weeks, with a one-step increase in the dose to 10 mg at 2 weeks. Amlodipine maintained blood pressure reduction throughout the 24-hours dosing interval with a once-daily dose. Notably, no side effects were observed; pulse rate, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters were not significantly altered with therapy. Amlodipine in a single daily dose of 5-10 mg is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Acute accidental exposure to chlorine fumes--a study of 82 cases.

Eighty-two patients were hospitalized following an accidental exposure to chlorine. All patients presented with dyspnoea and cough. The other symptoms included irritation of throat (53.6%), irritation of eyes (42.3%), headache (29.2%), abdominal pain (26.8%), vomiting (24.3%) and giddiness (9.7%). All of them had bronchospasm and 5 (6%) had cyanosis at the onset. An x-ray of the chest revealed patchy infiltrates in 3 (3.85%) and hilar congestion in 2 (2.44%). Pulmonary function tests showed an obstructive pattern in 27.4%, restrictive in 3.25% and mixed in 53.2%. Pulmonary functions were normal in 16.1% of the patients. Bronchoscopy revealed tracheobronchial mucosal congestion in all cases, hemorrhagic spots in 35.7%, erosions and ulcers in 12.5%. All patients were treated with oxygen, aminophylline, hydrocortisone and antibiotics. Haematemesis (n = 1) and pulmonary oedema (n = 2) developed 12 hours after the admission. Two other patients developed pneumonia 48 hours later. All patients recovered satisfactorily. On follow-up 16 patients had no sequelae after one year. Pulmonary functions were normal in 5 patients after 3 years of follow-up.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia--report of two cases.

Two young female patients aged 12 and 20 years with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia are presented with autopsy reports. Both had extensive coronary artery disease with myocardial infarction and tendon xanthomas. The first case had additional aortic stenosis.

Captopril--nifedipine interaction in hypertension.

Nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker exerts significant peripheral vasodilatory activity in hypertensive patients. It has been postulated that the antihypertensive effect of peripherally acting vasodilators is masked, by counter regulatory mechanism e.g. activation of renin-angiotensin aldosterone (RAA) axis. The present work was undertaken to study the effect of blockade of RAA axis using captopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on the blood pressure lowering activity of nifedipine. Pretreatment with captopril in a dose of 25 mg. bd was carried out for 4 weeks in one group of 10 patients before administering nifedipine 10 mg bd for 4 weeks. The other matched group of 10 patients received nifedipine alone in the same dose. It was observed that although captopril by itself had no appreciable effect on blood pressure in the dose used, it significantly enhanced the blood pressure lowering activity of nifedipine. It appears that counterregulatory mechanisms play an important role in determining the net antihypertensive effect of peripheral vasodilators.

Comparative evaluation of captopril and methyldopa monotherapy for hypertension: double-blind study in Indians.

A double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in 41 Indian men and women with hypertension to compare the antihypertensive effects of captopril and methyldopa. Twenty patients received 150 mg of captopril and 21 patients received 750 mg of methyldopa daily. The drugs were administered in three equally divided doses for four weeks. Blood pressure was measured after one, two, and four weeks of therapy. Relevant clinical and biochemical investigations were carried out before and after treatment. Sixteen patients given captopril and 11 given methyldopa responded to therapy. Among the captopril responders, initial mean systolic blood pressure (+/- SE) was 155 +/- 5.0 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure was 105 +/- 2.1 mmHg. These values were reduced to 119 +/- 9.8 and 80 +/- 6.1 mmHg, respectively, after four weeks of therapy. Similarly, among the methyldopa responders, initial mean systolic blood pressure was 180 +/- 7.4 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure was 112 +/- 3.8 mmHg. These values were reduced to 138 +/- 7.0 and 92 +/- 3.8 mmHg, respectively, after four weeks of therapy. The fall in the blood pressure in both groups was highly significant (P less than 0.001). None of the patients in either group had any clinically significant side effects. The results of this study suggest that monotherapy with captopril may be more effective than monotherapy with methyldopa in Indian hypertensives.

Treatment of amoebic liver abscess with tinidazole and metronidazole.

20 patients with amoebic liver abscess, confirmed by aspiration of typical amoebic 'pus', were treated in random order with either tinidazole or metronidazole in a dose of 2g once daily for 2 days. Clinical, radiological, and biochemical follow-up was done for 1 month. One patient, given metronidazole, absconded and 19 completed the trial. Complete recovery occurred in all 10 patients given tinidazole but in only 5 of the 9 given metronidazole (p = 0.05). Patients on tinidazole required repeat aspirations less frequently than those on metronidazole. Mild gastrointestinal side-effects occurred in 1 patient on metronidazole but in none on tinidazole. From the present study, tinidazole appears to be a more effective, better tolerated drug with a more rapid therapeutic effect than metronidazole.

Comparative study of tinidazole and metronidazole in amoebic liver abscess.

Twenty proven cases of amoebic liver abscess were treated at random with either tinidazole or metronidazole. The dose of both was 2 g once daily for 2 days. Clinical, radiological, and biochemical follow-up was done for 30 days. Of the 19 patients who completed the trial, complete recovery was observed in all 10 patients given tinidazole and in 5 of 9 patients given metronidazole (p=0.05). Moreover, patients on tinidazole required repeat aspirations less frequently than those on metronidazole. Mild gastrointestinal side-effects occurred in 1 patient on metronidazole. The results suggest that tinidazole is a more efficacious drug than metronidazole, with rapid therapeutic effect.