Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions into type 1 diabetes care.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To identify recent literature evaluating the efficacy of psychosocial and behavioral interventions for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RECENT FINDINGS: Interventions generally produce benefits for psychosocial and behavioral outcomes, and some also positively impact glycemia. Addressing psychosocial concerns during routine provider visits had mixed results; some studies found that structured tools improved well being, while others found they could derail conversations, or contribute to worsening glycemia due to a lack of time to review medical concerns. Integrating behavioral health providers in routine care, however, had a positive impact on glycemic outcomes. Stepped care interventions show promise for both children and adults, as they maximize available resources while contributing to improved well being. Group interventions, delivered either virtually or in-person, demonstrated benefits for diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, family conflict, and health behaviors, but had limited impact on positive parenting skills. Gaps in the current literature include limited research among adults and no research among older adults, as well as a lack of pragmatic research emphasizing implementation of effective interventions. SUMMARY: A wide range of interventions have demonstrated positive impacts on well being among people with T1D; more research is needed to identify strategies to routinely integrate psychosocial and behavioral support in clinical care.

Research design and baseline participant characteristics of the Resilient, Empowered, Active Living with Diabetes - Telehealth (REAL-T) Study: A randomized controlled trial for young adults with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic condition affecting nearly 1.9 million people in the United States. Young adults (YAs) with T1D face unique challenges in managing their condition, experiencing poorer health and well-being than other age groups. The current study is evaluating the Resilient, Empowered, Active Living (REAL) intervention, previously shown to improve glucose levels and quality of life among YAs with diabetes, using telehealth delivery (REAL-T) to expand reach and accessibility. This paper reports on the methodology and baseline participant characteristics of the REAL-T study. METHODS: REAL-T is a two-arm randomized controlled trial that recruited 18-30 year olds with T1D via clinics and social media advertising. Data collection, which was adapted to be fully remote due to COVID-19, occurs every three months for one year. Participants receive either usual care or a 6-month telehealth occupational therapy intervention. The primary outcome is glycated hemoglobin (A1c); secondary outcomes include diabetes distress, quality of life, and continuous glucose monitor-derived measures. RESULTS: The study enrolled a diverse sample of 209 YAs with T1D. Analysis of baseline data indicates equivalence between the intervention and control groups. Study participants have notably higher diabetes distress and poorer mental well-being than similar populations. CONCLUSION: The REAL-T study successfully adapted to remote implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. By examining long-term outcomes, mediating pathways, and cost-effectiveness, the study will contribute knowledge of the impact of tailored interventions for YAs with T1D, designed to reduce disparities and improve health and well-being in this population.