Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation.

Purpose: There are known disparities in chronic pain severity, treatment, and opioid-related risks amongst individuals from lower socioeconomic status, including Medicaid beneficiaries, but little is known about whether Medicaid beneficiaries benefit in a similar way from multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 3-week multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program.Methods: Participants (N = 131) completed a broad range of clinical measures pre- and post-treatment including pain severity, pain interference, depression, anxiety, objective physical functioning, and opioid misuse risk. Patients with Medicaid were compared with non-Medicaid patients in terms of baseline characteristics and rate of change, utilizing two-factor repeated measures analyses of variance.Results: There were baseline characteristic differences, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to be African American, have higher rates of pain, worse physical functioning, and lower rates of opioid use. Despite baseline differences, both groups demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all measures (p<.001) and no significant difference in rate of improvement.Conclusions: Results suggest that pain rehabilitation is as effective for Medicaid recipients as non-Medicaid recipients. Patients with Medicaid are particularly vulnerable to disparities in treatment, so efforts to expand access to multidisciplinary pain treatments are warranted.

Medicaid beneficiaries, who tend to be from lower socioeconomic status (SES), with chronic pain have poorer baseline functioning compared to non-Medicaid beneficiaries, including worse pain severity, poorer physical functioning, and higher levels of anxiety.Medicaid beneficiaries appear to benefit significantly and in a similar way to non-Medicaid individuals from participating in multidisciplinary, non-pharmacological chronic pain rehabilitation.Expanding access to evidence-based chronic pain rehabilitation, including nonopioid and multidisciplinary treatments, is a key component to address the chronic pain and opioid crises that differentially impact individuals from lower SES.

Pediatric sickle cell pain-sleep relationships: The roles of positive and negative affect.

OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the role of affect in the daily sleep quality-pain severity relationship in youth with sickle cell disease (SCD). Previous investigations have not allowed researchers to examine whether positive and negative affect work differentially in their relations with pediatric SCD pain, sleep, and the sleep-pain relationship. The current study focused on examining the possible mediating and moderating roles positive and negative affect have in the sleep-pain relationship for youth with SCD. METHOD: Eighty-eight youth with SCD (aged 8-17 years), and their guardians were recruited from three regional pediatric SCD clinics. Youth completed a twice daily ecological momentary assessment, where they reported on their daily pain severity, sleep quality, positive affect and negative affect. Multilevel models were calculated to examine the relationship between negative affect, positive affect, and the sleep-pain relationship. RESULTS: Multilevel mediation analyses indicated that low positive affect mediated the daily cyclic relationships between poor sleep and high pain. Moderation analyses indicated that high negative affect strengthened the relationship between high pain severity and poor sleep quality that night. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to examine the differential roles of positive and negative affect in other pain and adult SCD populations. Research examining the mechanisms by which positive and negative affect may influence the sleep-pain relationship is needed to inform future interventions to improve sleep and pain in the pediatric SCD population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Pain rehabilitation's dual power: Treatment for chronic pain and prevention of opioid-related risks.

The purpose of this article is to provide a data-driven exploration of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (PRP) as a viable option for addressing the dual crises of chronic pain and opioid use. Psychologists are crucial providers in the PRP, in both intervention and leadership roles. There is well-established literature supporting pain rehabilitation as an effective treatment for chronic pain and functioning, but there are few studies examining the effects of pain rehabilitation on opioid misuse risk. We evaluated data from 60 patients with diverse chronic pain conditions who completed an interdisciplinary PRP to evaluate changes in pain, functioning (self-report and objective physical measure), psychological symptoms, and health-related quality of life. To evaluate the effect of pain rehabilitation on opioid-related risks, we examined opioid use and opioid misuse behaviors (measured by the Current Opioid Misuse Measure; COMM) pre- and posttreatment. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all outcomes, with medium effect sizes for pain severity and large effect sizes for functioning, psychological symptoms, and emotional quality of life. Fifty-eight percent of patients were on opioid medications at entry compared with 15% at discharge. Among patients who entered on opioids, mean COMM scores were significantly reduced from above the cutoff for misuse risk (M = 13.57) to below the cutoff (M = 5.86). Overall, this study provided strong support for pain rehabilitation as an effective treatment for chronic pain and related suffering, while also providing a prevention-based opportunity for reducing opioid-related risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Feasibility and acceptability of an integrated behavioral medicine service within a post-bariatric surgery clinic.

BACKGROUND: Long-term medical and psychological follow-up after weight loss surgery is associated with improved patient outcomes. Weight regain after weight loss surgery is a common concern that has behavioral and psychological components; however, most patients do not attend behavioral medicine (BMED) follow-up appointments post-surgery. Innovative treatment models are needed to improve access to BMED to optimize long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an integrated BMED service within a bariatric surgery clinic. SETTING: University medical center, outpatient clinic. METHODS: Patients (n = 198) in a post-bariatric surgery clinic were screened for psychosocial/behavioral concerns and offered a same-day BMED consult, when appropriate. Patients rated their satisfaction with the consult and their confidence in being able to carry out the plan created during the consult. RESULTS: The top 3 concerns identified during screenings were emotional eating, body image, and cravings. The top 3 concerns addressed during consults were emotional eating, mood, and cravings. The mean length of consult was 26.1 minutes. The mean severity of problems addressed was 7 of 10. Patients' confidence ratings had a mean of 9.4 of 10 (1 = low, 10 = high) and satisfaction ratings had a mean of 9.8 of 10. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinic, the integration of a BMED service provided 40% of patients with behavioral intervention for psychosocial/behavioral concerns during routine surgery follow-up appointments. Patients indicated high satisfaction with consults and reported high confidence in being able to carry out the plan created during the consult.

Investigating the Sleep-Pain Relationship in Youth with Sickle Cell Utilizing mHealth Technology.

OBJECTIVES: The current study utilized mHealth technologies that were objective (e.g., sleep actigraphy and pulse oximetry) and time-sensitive (e.g., ecological momentary assessments [EMAs]) to characterize sleep in youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) and investigate the relationships between sleep variables and pain. It also investigated the influence of age on sleep and the sleep-pain relationship. METHODS: Eighty-eight youth with SCD (aged 8-17 years) were recruited from three regional pediatric SCD clinics. Youth completed twice daily EMAs for up to 4 weeks to assess nighttime subjective sleep quality and daily pain. They also wore a sleep actigraph for 2 weeks to assess sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency, and a wrist-worn pulse oximeter for two nights to assess whether they had sleep apnea. Multilevel models were calculated predicting daily SCD pain using the sleep variables, age, and the interaction between age and the sleep variables. RESULTS: None of the sleep variables were related to one another. Poor subjective sleep quality during the night was related to high pain severity the next day, and high pain was related to poor subjective sleep quality that night. Older age was associated with poorer subjective sleep quality, shorter duration of nighttime sleep, and high sleep latency. Also, findings indicated that as age increased, the strength of the relationship between poor continuous subjective sleep quality and high pain severity increased. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to examine possible mechanisms connecting subjective sleep quality to high pain.