Surgical Strategy for Petroclival Meningioma-Related Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Role of Porus Trigeminus Opening.

OBJECTIVE: Petroclival meningiomas invade Meckel's cave through the porus trigeminus, leading to secondary trigeminal neuralgia. Microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are the typical treatment options. This study investigated symptom control, outcomes, and surgical strategies for PC meningioma-induced TN. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 TN patients with PC meningiomas who underwent microsurgical nerve decompression between January 2021 and February 2023. In all patients undergoing a transpetrosal approach, the porus trigeminus was opened to enable the removal of the entire tumor within Meckel's cave. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Barrow Neurologic Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. Risk factors for poor TN outcomes and poor facial numbness were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 28 patients, 21 (75%) underwent the transpetrosal approach, 5 (17.9%) underwent the retrosigmoid approach, and 2 (7.1%) underwent the Dolenc approach. Following microsurgery, 23 patients (82.1%) experienced TN relief without further medication (BNI I or II). TN recurrence occurred in 2 patients (7.1%), and 3 patients (10.7%) did not achieve TN relief. Cavernous sinus invasion was significantly correlated with poor TN outcomes (P = 0.047). A history of previous SRS (P = 0.011) and upper clivus type tumor (P = 0.018) were significantly associated with poor facial numbness. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical nerve decompression is effective in improving BNI scores in patients with TN associated with PC meningiomas. Considering the results of our study, the opening of the porus trigeminus can be considered as a suggested procedure in the treatment of PC meningiomas, especially in cases accompanied by TN.

Exploring prognostic factors and treatment strategies for long-term survival in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients.

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXA) are rare, accounting for < 1% of all astrocytomas. Literature on the clinical course and treatment outcomes of PXAs is limited. The study aimed to determine prognosis and treatment strategies for PXAs. Patients who had PXAs surgery between 2000-2021 were retrospectively analyzed for demographics and radiological characteristics. Initial and salvage treatment outcomes were recorded. Overall, 40 and 9 patients had grade 2 and 3 PXAs; their 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 75.8% and 37.0%, respectively (p = 0.003). Univariate analysis revealed that strong T1 enhancement (p = 0.036), infiltrative tumor margins (p < 0.001), peritumoral edema (p = 0.003), WHO grade (p = 0.005), and gross total resection (p = 0.005) affected the PFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that the WHO grade (p = 0.010) and infiltrative tumor margins (p = 0.008) influenced the PFS. The WHO grade (p = 0.027) and infiltrative tumor margins (p = 0.027) also affected the overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis for grade 2 PXAs revealed no significant associations between adjuvant radiation therapy and the PFS and OS. This study highlighted the heterogeneous nature of PXAs and its impact on patient prognosis. Infiltrative tumor margins emerged as a key prognostic factor. Our findings have emphasized the prognostic relevance of radiological features and the need for larger studies on comprehensive management.

Thromboembolic events during endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Clinical significance of platelet reactivity unit and adjunctive cilostazol.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reveal the clinical significance of the platelet reactivity unit (PRU) and the efficacy of adjunctive cilostazol and its association with thromboembolic and microembolic events after coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 427 patients with UIAs who underwent endovascular treatment between July 2011 and June 2014. When clopidogrel resistance was confirmed via PRU assay after dual antiplatelet medication (aspirin plus clopidogrel) administration for 5 days, triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol was administered (Group I, 274 patients). The other group was placed on standard dual antiplatelet therapy (Group II, 153 patients). All patients underwent magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging within 2 days after endovascular coiling. RESULTS: No significant associations with the occurrence of thromboembolic and microembolic events were found between the groups. The occurrence of thromboembolic and microembolic events showed no statistical difference between groups I and II (p = 0.725 for thromboembolic events and p = 0.109 for microembolic events). Also, the PRU value and the occurrence of microembolic events, using a PRU cutoff value of 240, showed no statistical difference (p = 0.114 in group I and 0.064 in group II). There was significant increase in microembolic events after the use of a stent-assisted endovascular procedure. As the PRU value increased, there was a trend toward an increase in the mean number of microembolic lesions without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Even though there is a presumed anti-thromboembolic effect for clopidogrel resistance in other literature, the clinical efficacy of adjustment of additional cilostazol for endovascular coiling of unruptured aneurysms may be limited due to the unspecified cutoff value of the PRU assay for evaluating the resistance.