Prognostic impact of pretreatment skeletal muscle index and CONUT score in diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been reported in several previous studies, its clinical relevance for the presence of sarcopenia has not been assessed. METHODS: In this study, 305 DLBCL patients were reviewed. They were categorized into normal/mild (n = 219) and moderate/severe (n = 86) CONUT groups. Sarcopenia was assessed using the L3-skeletal muscle index measured by baseline computed tomography imaging. Based on CONUT score and sarcopenia, patients were grouped: A (normal/mild CONUT and no sarcopenia), B (either moderate/severe CONUT or sarcopenia, but not both), and C (both moderate/severe CONUT and sarcopenia). RESULTS: The moderate/severe CONUT group showed higher rates of ≥ grade 3 febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, non-hematologic toxicities, and early treatment discontinuation not related to disease progression, compared to the normal/mild CONUT group. The moderate/severe CONUT group had a lower complete response rate (58.1% vs. 80.8%) and shorter median overall survival (18.5 vs. 162.6 months) than the normal/mild group. Group C had the poorest prognosis with a median survival of 8.6 months, while groups A and B showed better outcomes (not reached and 60.1 months, respectively). Combining CONUT score and sarcopenia improved the predictive accuracy of the Cox regression model (C-index: 0.763), compared to the performance of using either CONUT score (C-index: 0.754) or sarcopenia alone (C-index: 0.755). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the moderate/severe CONUT group exhibited treatment intolerance, lower response, and poor prognosis. Additionally, combining CONUT score and sarcopenia enhanced predictive accuracy for survival outcomes compared to individual variables.

Busulfan, Melphalan, and Etoposide (BuME) Showed an Equivalent Effect to Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide (BuCE) as Conditioning Therapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or High-Risk Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study bythe Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL).

PURPOSE: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard management for relapsed or high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We reported the busulfan, melphalan, and etoposide (BuME) conditioning regimen was effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk NHL. Moreover, the busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCE) conditioning regimen has been used widely in ASCT for NHL. Therefore, based on these encouraging results, this randomized phase II multicenter trial compared the outcomes of BuME and BuCE as conditioning therapies for ASCT in patients with NHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either BuME (n=36) or BuCE (n=39). The BuME regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day, intravenously) administered on days -7, -6, and -5, etoposide (400 mg/m2 intravenously) on days -5 and -4, and melphalan (50 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days -3 and -2. The BuCE regimen was comprised of busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days -7, -6, and -5, etoposide (400 mg/m2/day intravenously) on days -5 and -4, and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/day intravenously) on days -3 and -2. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled. Eleven patients (30.5%) in the BuME group and 13 patients (33.3%) in the BuCE group had disease progression or died. The 2-year PFS rate was 65.4% in the BuME group and 60.6% in the BuCE group (p=0.746). There were no non-relapse mortalities within 100 days after transplantation. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in PFS between the two groups. Therefore, busulfan-based conditioning regimens, BuME and BuCE, may be important treatment substitutes for the BCNU-containing regimens.

Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) as a predictive biomarker in small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial activation and insult may contribute to the aggressive clinical course of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, no predictive biomarker for this pathogenesis has been identified. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) in SCLC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the EASIX was calculated from measurements of serum lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet levels. A total of 264 patients with SCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were stratified into high and low EASIX groups. RESULTS: Complete and objective response rates in the limited-stage (LD) were 19.5% vs. 33.3% (P= 0.050) and 85.4% vs. 97.9% (P= 0.028) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the response rate between the two groups in the extensive-stage (ED). The median overall survival was 9.8 vs. 40.5 months in LD (P< 0.001) and 7.2 vs. 11.9 months in ED (P< 0.001) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high EASIX level was an independent prognostic factor for worse progression-free and overall survival irrespective of stage. CONCLUSION: EASIX may be a potential predictive biomarker of SCLC.

Safety and efficacy of nilotinib in adult patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a post-marketing surveillance study in Korea.

Background: Nilotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety for frontline and 2nd line treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML). This study aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice within South Korea. Methods: An open-label, multicenter, single-arm, 12-week observational post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was conducted on 669 Korean adult patients with Ph+ CML from December 24, 2010, to December 23, 2016. The patients received nilotinib treatment in routine clinical practice settings. Safety was evaluated by all types of adverse events (AEs) during the study period, and efficacy was evaluated by the complete hematological response (CHR) and cytogenetic response. Results: During the study period, AEs occurred in 61.3% (410 patients, 973 events), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in 40.5% (271/669 patients, 559 events), serious AEs in 4.5% (30 patients, 37 events), and serious ADRs in 0.7% (5 patients, 8 events). Furthermore, unexpected AEs occurred at a rate of 6.9% (46 patients, 55 events) and unexpected ADRs at 1.2% (8 patients, 8 events). As for the efficacy results, CHR was achieved in 89.5% (442/494 patients), and minor cytogenetic response or major cytogenetic response was achieved in 85.8% (139/162 patients). Conclusion: This PMS study shows consistent results in terms of safety and efficacy compared with previous studies. Nilotinib was well tolerated and efficacious in adult Korean patients with Ph+ CML in routine clinical practice settings.

The association of genetic alterations with response rate in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Genetic differences may be associated with the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this study, we identified genetic alterations between rapid and slow responders (BCR/ABL1 International Scale at 6 months: ≤0.1 % vs. > 0.1 %) of TKI treatment in chronic phase CML patients. Our analyses involved single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), a Genome Wide Association Study and a Network-wide Association Study (NetWAS). Seventy-two patients from 16 institutions were enrolled and treated with a TKI, nilotinib. Gene Set Analysis identified genetic alterations in pathways related to the differentiation, proliferation, and activity of various innate immune cells. The NetWAS analysis found that genes associated with natural killer (NK) cells (PTPRCAP, BLNK, HCK, ARHGEF11, GPR183, TRPV2, SHKBP1, CD2) showed significant differences between rapid and slow responders of nilotinib. However, we found no significantly different genetic alterations according to the response in the SNP analysis. In conclusion, we found that rapidity of response to TKI was associated with pathway-associated genetic alterations in immune cells, particularly with respect to NK cell activity. These results suggested that the innate immune system at initial diagnosis had an important role in treatment response in patients with CML.

Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is known to adversely affect the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. The cachexia index (CXI) is a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia, and its implications for the prognosis and treatment outcome of lung cancer and aggressive lymphoma has been assessed in previous studies. METHODS: A total of 267 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The CXI was calculated as the skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Although previous studies measured the SMI using the muscles of the L3 vertebral level, the present study used both the L3 vertebral muscles and the pectoralis muscles (PM) at the T4 vertebral level to measure the SMI. Depending on the type of muscles used, the CXI was termed the L3-CXI or PM-CXI. Using sex-specific cutoff values for CXI, the patients were categorized as follows: (i) high-CXI group (high L3-CXI and high PM-CXI), (ii) intermediate-CXI group (high L3-CXI and low PM-CXI), and (iii) low-CXI group (low L3-CXI and low PM-CXI). RESULTS: Complete responses to R-CHOP were obtained in 145/173 (83.8%), 25/36 (69.4%), and 27/57 (47.4%) patients in the high-CXI, intermediate-CXI, and low-CXI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment-related anaemia (15.6%, 30.6%, and 26.3%, P = 0.038), thrombocytopenia (21.4%, 36.1%, and 43.9%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (23.7%, 44.4%, and 36.8%, P = 0.022), and any nonhaematologic toxicity (31.2%, 44.4%, and 54.4%, P = 0.001) of Grade 3 or more were more common in the lower CXI groups than in the higher-CXI groups. Early treatment discontinuation for reasons other than lymphoma progression also occurred more frequently in the low-CXI group (24/57, 42.1%) compared with the intermediate-CXI (5/36, 13.9%) and high-CXI (18/173, 10.4%) groups (P < 0.001). Median overall survival in the high-CXI, intermediate-CXI, and low-CXI groups was not reached, 50.6 months, and 14.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that low CXI was an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.103, 95% confidence interval 1.278-3.460, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the CXI is a biomarker for cancer cachexia that can predict survival, treatment response, treatment-related toxicity, and compliance with R-CHOP. Patients were more clearly stratified by this new CXI category compared with the classifications described in previous studies.

Ultra-deep sequencing mutation analysis of the BCR/ABL1 kinase domain in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Ultra-deep sequencing detects low-frequency genetic mutations with high sensitivity. We used this approach to prospectively examine mutations in the BCR/ABL1 tyrosine kinase from patients with newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib. Between May 2013 and November 2014, 50 patients from 18 institutions were enrolled in the study. We screened 103 somatic mutations and found that mutations in the P-loop domain were the most frequent (173/454 mutations in the P-loop) and noted the presence of the V299 L mutation (dasatinib-resistant/nilotinib-sensitive) in 98 % of patients (49/50). No patients had Y253H, E255 V, or F359 V/C/I mutations, which would recommend dasatinib rather than nilotinib treatment. The S417Y mutation was associated with lower achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) at 6 months, and the V371A mutation was associated with reduced MMR and MR4.5 durations (MMR for 2 years: 100 % for no mutation vs. 75 % for mutation, P=0.039; MR4.5 for 15 months: 94.1 % vs. 25 %, P=0.002). Patients with known nilotinib-resistant mutations had lower rates of MR4.5 achievement. In conclusion, ultra-deep sequencing is a sensitive method for genetic-based treatment decisions. Based on the results of these mutational analyses, nilotinib treatment is a promising option for Korean patients with CML.

An open-label expanded access program of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib is approved globally for EGFR-TKI treatment-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this Korean expanded access program, we evaluated its 'real-world' safety and efficacy. METHODS: EGFR-TKI treatment-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC received afatinib 40 mg/day until disease progression or other withdrawal criteria. Dose reductions were permitted for adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the number of patients with AEs (CTCAE version 3.0). Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and changes in investigator-assessed cancer-related symptoms. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients received afatinib, including 27 (31%) with brain metastases and 16 (18%) with uncommon EGFR mutations. Median PFS was 17.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9-23.3 months). Grade 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 51 (58%) patients; the most common were diarrhea (22%) and rash/acne (20%). No grade > 3 TRAEs were reported. AEs leading to dose reduction occurred in 49 (56%) patients. Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 4 (5%) patients. ORR was 81% overall, 89% in patients with brain metastases, and 55% in patients with uncommon mutations (excluding T790M/exon 20 insertions). Median DOR was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.4-21.4 months). Cancer-related symptoms were improved/unchanged/worsened in 34-66%/36-66%/0-3% of patients over the first year. CONCLUSIONS: No unexpected safety signals for afatinib were observed. AEs were manageable; the treatment discontinuation rate was low. Afatinib showed encouraging efficacy in a broad patient population including those with brain metastases or tumors harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01931306 ; 29/08/2013.

Phase 2 study of afatinib among patients with recurrent and/or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to investigate the clinical activity of, safety of, and predictive biomarkers for afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-ESCC). METHODS: Patients with R/M-ESCC that was refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled in the current multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study and received afatinib at a dose of 40 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, the disease control rate, and the safety profile. To identify predictive biomarkers, single-nucleotide variations, short insertions/deletions, and somatic copy number alterations were assessed using whole-exome sequencing and their associations with clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 49 enrolled patients, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 14.3% and 73.3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 6.6 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 months and 6.3 months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were noted to have occurred in 33 patients (67.3%), with the majority being of grade 1 to 2 (adverse events were graded and recorded based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.03]). Whole-exome sequencing demonstrated that the ESCC genomes of patients who demonstrated a response to afatinib were enriched with genomic alterations of TP53 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). As a predictive marker, a score derived from TP53 disruptive mutations and EGFR amplifications and/or missense mutations demonstrated a significant association with the response to afatinib. The score based on the mutational status of EGFR and TP53 achieved a performance of an area under the curve of 0.86 in predicting the sensitivity of afatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated that afatinib can confer modest clinical benefits with manageable toxicity in patients with platinum-resistant R/M-ESCC. Identification of TP53 alterations and EGFR amplifications may serve as predictive markers with which to identify patients with R/M-ESCC who may benefit from afatinib. LAY SUMMARY: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a type of cancer with a dismal prognosis and very limited treatment options. The clinical efficacy of afatinib was evaluated in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic ESCC, with adverse events demonstrating the modest efficacy with manageable toxicity of this irreversible, pan-ErbB kinase inhibitor. Whole-exome sequencing analysis of 41 cases of ESCC further revealed that the patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplifications and disruptive TP53 mutations are more likely to benefit from treatment with afatinib. The results of the current study have highlighted the clinical value of EGFR and TP53 as predictive biomarkers of platinum-resistant recurrent and/or metastatic ESCC for afatinib sensitivity.

Prognostic model based on the geriatric nutritional risk index and sarcopenia in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation and cachexia are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is one of the main parameters used to assess these conditions, but its efficacy in DLBCL is inconclusive. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 228 DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP immunochemotherapy (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). The patients were stratified according to GNRI score (> 98, 92 to 98, 82 to < 92, and < 82) as defined in previous studies. Additionally, the extent of sarcopenia was categorized as sarcopenia-both, sarcopenia-L3/PM alone, and non-sarcopenia-both according to skeletal muscle index. RESULTS: Survival curves plotted against a combination of GNRI and sarcopenia scores revealed two clear groups as follows: high cachexia risk (HCR) group (GNRI < 82, sarcopenia-both, or GNRI 82-92 with sarcopenia-L3/PM alone) and low cachexia risk (LCR) group (others). The HCR group had a lower complete response rate (46.5% vs. 86.6%) and higher frequency of treatment-related mortality (19.7% vs. 3.8%) and early treatment discontinuation (43.7% vs. 8.3%) compared with the LCR group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) (not reached vs. 10.3 months, p <  0.001) and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 12.9 months, p <  0.001) were much shorter in the HCR group than in the LCR group. On multivariable analyses, the HCR group was shown to be an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS and OS after adjusting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI). CONCLUSIONS: A combined model of GNRI and sarcopenia may provide prognostic information independently of the NCCN-IPI in DLBCL.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic marker in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) have not previously been reported. METHODS: This study analyzed 352 patients enrolled in a previous randomized phase III trial comparing the efficacy of irinotecan plus cisplatin with that of etoposide plus cisplatin as the first-line therapy for ED-SCLC. GNRI values were calculated using serum albumin levels and actual and ideal bodyweights. Patients with a GNRI > 98, 92-98, and <92 were grouped into no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively. RESULTS: The objective response rates were 63.2%, 52.6%, and 49.2% in the no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively (P = 0.024). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in patients with a lower GNRI than in those with a higher GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 6.5 vs. 5.8 vs. 5.9 months, respectively; P = 0.028). There were significant differences in median overall survival (OS) according to GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 13.2 vs. 10.3 vs. 8.4 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that being in the moderate/major risk group was an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.300, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012-1.670; P = 0.040) and OS (HR: 1.539; 95% CI: 1.069-2.216; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that a low GNRI value was associated with a poor prognosis, and it supports the relationship between systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and clinical outcomes in patients with ED-SCLC.Key points SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The lower GNRI group had a low response rate to chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. The HRs for PFS and OS were 1.300 and 1.539 in the patients with GNRI < 92. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Low GNRI is associated with poor prognosis in ED-SCLC.

Clinical Outcomes of Decitabine Treatment for Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome on the Basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System.

INTRODUCTION: Decitabine has shown clinical benefits in patients with intermediate (INT)-2 or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), determined according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), but the benefits have not been well demonstrated in patients with lower-risk (IPSS low or INT-1) disease. Recently, it was proposed that the prognosis for patients with IPSS lower-risk disease is heterogeneous, with a substantial proportion of these patients having poor survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients with IPSS lower-risk MDS from the DRAMA (An Observational Study for Dacogen Long-Term Treatment in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome; NCT01400633) and DIVA (A Study for Dacogen Treatment in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome; NCT01041846) studies, which were prospective observational studies on the efficacy and safety of decitabine treatment in patients with MDS. Using the Lower-Risk Prognostic Scoring System [LR-PSS], we classified IPSS lower-risk MDS. Patients in each LR-PSS category were divided according to overall response (OR) to decitabine treatment, and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients were enrolled: LR-PSS category 1 (n = 12; 10.3%), category 2 (n = 56; 48.3%), and category 3 (n = 48; 41.4%). Survival outcomes differed among the 3 categories (P = .046). The overall survival according to OR showed a significant difference in total patients (P = .008) and category 3 patients (P = .003). We analyzed predictive factors for OR, but no variable was found to significantly affect OR. CONCLUSION: Decitabine treatment showed a survival benefit in the higher-risk group of IPSS lower-risk MDS patients who responded to treatment, and classification using the LR-PSS category was helpful for this subgroup, indicating that decitabine treatment might alter the natural course of disease in these patients.

Safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of olmutinib in non-small cell lung cancer with T790M mutation: A single arm, open label, phase 1/2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phase 1/2 study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of olmutinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed ≥ 1 previous line of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase 1 consisted of dose-escalation and four dose-expansion parts (1: olmutinib 300 mg once daily; 2A: 800 mg once daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-positive patients]; 2B: 500 mg twice daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-positive]; 3: 800 mg once daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-negative]). In phase 2, EGFR T790 M mutation-positive patients received olmutinib 800 mg once daily. Data from expansion part 2A and phase 2 were integrated (`pooled phase 2'). Each olmutinib cycle was 21 days. Outcomes included: tumor response, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 272 patients received at least one olmutinib dose: dose-escalation (n = 66), expansion parts (n = 165), phase 2 (n = 41). In pooled phase 2, the overall objective response rate, confirmed by independent review, was 55.1% (38/69 evaluable patients; 95% CI, 42.6-67.1). All responses were partial responses; 23 patients had stable disease. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 (95% CI, 5.6-9.7) months; estimated median overall survival was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (59.2% of patients), pruritus (42.1%), rash (40.8%), and nausea (39.5%). CONCLUSION: Olmutinib showed effective clinical activity with a manageable safety profile, indicating therapeutic potential for T790M-positive NSCLC patients who have failed ≥ 1 previous line of EGFR-TKI therapy.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-Naïve Korean Patients with Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinote-can plus cisplatin (IP) over etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in Korean patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive IP, composed of irinotecan 65 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8+cisplatin 70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks, or EP, composed of etoposide 100 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 3+cisplatin 70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles, until disease progression, or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were randomized to IP (n=173) and EP (n=189) arms. There were no significant differences between IP and EP arms for the median overall survival (10.9 months vs. 10.3 months, p=0.120) and the median progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p=0.115). However, there was a significant difference in response rate (62.4% vs. 48.2%, p=0.006). The pre-planned subgroup analyses showed that IP was associated with longer overall survival in male (11.3 months vs. 10.1 months, p=0.036), < 65 years old (12.7 months vs. 11.3 months, p=0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 (12.4 months vs. 10.9 months, p=0.040) patient groups. The severity of treatment-related adverse events such as grade 3/4 anemia, nausea and diarrhea was more frequent in patients treated with IP. CONCLUSION: The IP chemotherapy did not significantly improve the survival compared with EP chemotherapy in Korean patients with extensive-disease SCLC.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Study Comparing Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Followed by Maintenance Pemetrexed versus Pemetrexed Alone in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of First-Line EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: KCSG-LU12-13.

PURPOSE: The optimal cytotoxic regimens have not been established for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop disease progression on first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-center randomized phase II trial to compare the clinical outcomes between pemetrexed plus cisplatin combination therapy followed by maintenance pemetrexed (PC) and pemetrexed monotherapy (P) after failure of first-line EGFR-TKI. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and safety and toxicity profiles. RESULTS: A total of 96 patientswere randomized, and 91 patientswere treated at 14 centers in Korea. The ORR was 34.8% (16/46) for the PC arm and 17.8% (8/45) for the P arm (p=0.066). With 23.4 months of follow-up, the median PFS was 5.4 months in the PC arm and 6.4 months in the P arm (p=0.114). The median OS was 17.9 months and 15.7 months in PC and P arms, respectively (p=0.787). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were reported in 12 patients (26.1%) in the PC arm and nine patients (20.0%) in the P arm (p=0.491). The overall time trends of HRQOL were not significantly different between the two arms. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of pemetrexed therapy in NSCLC patients with disease progression after firstline EGFR-TKI might not be improved by adding cisplatin.

Clinical impact of prognostic nutritional index in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

We evaluated the association between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the clinical features of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and developed a novel prognostic model using a nomogram including the PNI and other biomarkers for cancer cachexia. A total of 228 DLBCL patients treated with first-line R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) were retrospectively reviewed. PNI was calculated as 10 × serum levels of albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × absolute lymphocyte count (/mm3). Patients were categorized into low- and high-PNI groups based on a cut-off value of 40. The nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) was constructed using a Cox regression model. PNI was positively correlated with skeletal muscle index, body mass index, and serum levels of albumin. The low-PNI group had a lower complete response rate (60.3% vs. 87.6%), increased treatment-related toxicity, and more frequent treatment discontinuation (43.5% vs. 8.8%) than the high-PNI group. The median OS was shorter in the low-PNI group than the high-PNI group (15.6 months vs. not reached; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that PNI, sarcopenia, and the international prognostic index (IPI) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The nomogram developed using this regression model showed excellent discriminatory ability for predicting OS (c-index, 0.80) compared to the IPI alone (c-index, 0.75). Low PNI was associated with adverse clinical features of DLBCL. The proposed nomogram supports the clinical impact of cachexia on survival and may contribute to individualized therapy in DLBCL.

The Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Transplantation Ineligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an independent prognostic marker in solid and hematological cancers. While the derived NLR (dNLR) was shown to be non-inferior to the NLR in large cohorts of patients with different cancer types, it has not been validated as a prognostic marker for multiple myeloma (MM) to date. METHODS: Between May 22, 2011 and May 29, 2014, 176 patients with MM from 38 centers who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were analyzed. The dNLR was calculated using complete blood count differential data. The optimal dNLR cut-off value according to receiver operating characteristic analysis of overall survival (OS) was 1.51. All patients were treated with melphalan and prednisone combined with bortezomib. RESULTS: The complete response rate was lower in the high dNLR group compared to the low dNLR group (7 vs. 26.1%, respectively; p = 0.0148); the corresponding 2-year OS rates were 72.2 and 84.7%, respectively (p = 0.0354). A high dNLR was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.217, 95% CI 1.015-4.842; p = 0.0458). CONCLUSION: The dNLR is a readily available and cheaply obtained parameter in clinical studies, and shows considerable potential as a new prognostic marker for transplantation-ineligible patients with MM.

Low pre-treatment nutritional index is significantly related to poor outcomes in small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The importance of nutritional status and chronic inflammation has been emphasized in cancer. We investigated the impact of Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) on clinical outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. METHODS: Data from 220 SCLC patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The OPNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin level (g/dL) + 0.005 × absolute lymphocyte count (/mm3 ). Patients with an OPNI of > 45, 40-45, or < 40 were categorized in high, intermediate, or low OPNI groups, respectively. RESULTS: The proportion of non-responders to first-line therapy increased as the OPNI decreased (high, intermediate, low OPNI groups: 6.7%, 18.0%, and 30.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Early discontinuation of first-line therapy because of treatment toxicity occurred more frequently in the lower OPNI groups (high, intermediate, low OPNI groups: 5.8%, 21.3%, and 25.6%, respectively; P < 0.001). The one-year progression-free and overall survival rates in the high, intermediate, and low OPNI groups were 29%, 19%, and 3%, and 61%, 46%, and 23%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the low OPNI group was independently associated with poor progression-free (hazard ratio 1.592; 95% confidence interval 1.009-2.511; P = 0.046) and overall (hazard ratio 1.911; 95% confidence interval 1.208-3.024; P = 0.006) survival compared to the high OPNI group. CONCLUSION: SCLC patients with an OPNI < 40 showed a low tolerance to chemotherapy and a poor prognosis. Further evaluation is needed to validate these findings.

Prognostic impact of pretreatment albumin to globulin ratio in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical implications of the albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). METHODS: Data of 232 patients with DLBCL treated with first-line R-CHOP from 2004 to 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with AGR values ≥1.22 and <1.22 were assigned to the high and low AGR groups, respectively. Treatment response, treatment-related toxicity, and survival were compared according to the AGR. RESULTS: The complete response rate was significantly lower in the low AGR group than in the high AGR group (59.1% vs. 81.3%; p < 0.001). Treatment-related mortality was also more frequent in the low AGR group than in the high AGR group (14.0% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.009). The low AGR group (median overall survival [OS] = 26.87 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.19-49.55) showed a significant decrease in OS compared to the high AGR group (median OS = 148.83 months; 95% CI = 76.26-221.41; p < 0.001). Progression-free survival (PFS) also decreased significantly in the low AGR group (median PFS = 14.29 months; 95% CI = 2.58-26.01) compared to the high AGR group (median PFS = 148.83 months; 95% CI = 76.21-221.45; p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, low AGR was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment AGR was useful for predicting treatment response, treatment-related toxicity, and prognosis in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. Further large prospective studies will be necessary to validate our findings.

A phase 4 study of nilotinib in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTKorea.

Although nilotinib has improved efficacy compared to imatinib, suboptimal response and intolerable adverse events (AEs) limit its effectiveness in many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). We investigated the 2-year efficacy and safety of nilotinib and their relationships with plasma nilotinib concentrations (PNCs). In this open-label, multi-institutional phase 4 study, 110 Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML-CP patients were treated with nilotinib at a starting dose of 300 mg twice daily. Molecular responses (MRs) and AEs were monitored for up to 24 months. The 24-month cumulative MR4.5 rate was evaluated as the primary endpoint. Plasma samples were collected from 94 patients to determine PNCs, and the per-patient mean was used to categorize them into four mean PNC (MPNC) groups. Cumulative MR rates and safety were compared between groups. With a median follow-up of 22.2 months, the 24-month cumulative MR4.5 rate was 56.2% (95% confidence interval, 44.0%-8.3%), and the median time to MR4.5 was 23.3 months. There were no significant differences in the cumulative rates of major molecular response, MR4 , and MR4.5 between MPNC groups. One patient died due to acute viral hepatitis, and two developed hematological or cytogenetic relapse, while no progression to accelerated or blast phase was observed. Safety results were consistent with previous studies with no new safety signal identified. Across the MPNC groups, there was no significant linear trend in the frequency of AEs. Nilotinib is highly effective for the treatment of CML-CP with manageable AEs. The measurement of PNC has no predictive value for patient outcomes and is thus not found to be clinically useful. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT03332511.