The Risk Factors, Incidence and Prognosis of Postpartum Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Study by the SMARTSHIP Group.

The term 'pregnancy-associated breast cancer' is no longer used as it has been consistently reported that breast cancer during pregnancy and breast cancer after delivery (postpartum breast cancer) have different characteristics and prognosis. The purpose of this study is to define postpartum breast cancer by analyzing the incidence rate, related factors, and prognosis according to the timing of breast cancer. Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service were used to analyze 1,292,727 women aged 20-49 years who birthed their first child between 2007 and 2012. The annual incidence rate of breast cancer after delivery increased every year (7.7 per 10,000 person-years after 5 years, 19.36 per 10,000 person-years after 10 years). The risk of breast cancer was significantly higher (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.27, P=0.0037) in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes, but that was not associated with overall survival (OS). Patients diagnosed with breast cancer within 5 years of delivery had a poorer prognosis than those diagnosed later (5-year OS, <5 years: 91.1% vs. 5-10 years: 96.0%). In multivariate analysis of OS, the hazard ratio of patients diagnosed within 5 years after delivery was twice as high as of patients diagnosed between 5 and 10 years. Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of breast cancer. Breast cancer patients diagnosed within 5 years of delivery had a poorer prognosis than those diagnosed later. In this regard, careful screening for early diagnosis of high-risk patients and intensive research on new treatment strategies are needed.

Association of depression and anxiety disorder with the risk of mortality in breast cancer: A National Health Insurance Service study in Korea.

PURPOSE: To examine whether depression, anxiety disorder, and their co-occurrence would increase the risk of mortality in patients with breast cancer, and whether antidepressant treatment would reduce the same. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the database of the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Of 145,251 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2007 and 2014, 20,870 patients diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorder one year before breast cancer diagnosis were excluded. Thus, data of 124,381 patients were included in this study. RESULTS: Depression and anxiety disorder were associated with an increased risk of mortality [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.36; HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.22, respectively] and their co-occurrence further increased the risk (HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.24-1.54). Antidepressant treatment was related to a reduced risk of mortality. Compared to patients without any psychiatric comorbidity with no antidepressant treatment, the mortality risk increased in patients with either psychiatric comorbidity or both, but the risk seemed to attenuate with antidepressant treatments. CONCLUSION: The current findings suggest that psychiatric comorbidities are markers of increased mortality risk in patients with breast cancer, and antidepressant treatment may attenuate the risk. This underscores the need for screening and treating depression and anxiety disorders to improve survival in patients with breast cancer.

The reality in the follow-up of breast cancer survivors: survey of Korean Breast Cancer Society.

PURPOSE: Follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer is an important component of survivor care and various international guidelines exist for the surveillance. However, little is known about current actual practice patterns of physicians whether they adhere to or deviate from recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how physicians follow-up their patients after primary treatment for breast cancer in Korea. METHODS: A questionnaire survey with 34 questions in 4 categories was e-mailed to the members of Korean Breast Cancer Society from November to December 2013. Respondents were asked how they use follow-up modalities after primary treatment of breast cancer and we compared the survey results with present guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 129 respondents, 123 (95.3%) were breast surgeons. The most important consideration in follow-up was tumor stage. History taking, physical examinations, and mammography were conducted in similar frequency recommended by other guidelines while breast ultrasonography was performed more often. The advanced imaging studies such as CT, MRI, and bone scan, which had been recommended to be conducted only if necessary, were also examined more frequently. Regular screenings for secondary malignancy were performed in 38 respondents (29.5%). Five years later after primary treatment, almost the whole respondents (94.6%) themselves monitored their patients. CONCLUSION: A majority of respondents have been performed more intensive follow-up modalities in comparison with present guidelines and less frequently screenings for secondary malignancy. For optimal follow-up of breast cancer survivors, tailored delivery system should be considered.

A review of breast cancer survivorship issues from survivors' perspectives.

Despite the fact that more breast cancer survivors are currently enjoying longer lifespans, there remains limited knowledge about the factors and issues that are of greatest significance for these survivors, particularly from their perspectives. This review was based on the concept that the topics addressed should focus on the perspectives of current survivors and should be extended to future modalities, which physicians will be able to use to gain a better understanding of the hidden needs of these patients. We intended to choose and review dimensions other than the pathology and the disease process that could have been overlooked during treatment. The eight topics upon which we focused included: delay of treatment and survival outcome; sexual well-being; concerns about childbearing; tailored follow-up; presence of a family history of breast cancer; diet and physical activity for survivors and their families; qualitative approach toward understanding of breast cancer survivorship, and; mobile health care for breast cancer survivors. Through this review, we aimed to examine the present clinical basis of the central issues noted from the survivors' perspectives and suggest a direction for future survivorship-related research.