Efficacy of Dyslipidemia Control by Combination Therapy with Rosuvastatin 10 Mg and Ezetimibe 10 Mg Compared with Rosuvastatin 20 Mg Monotherapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized, Single-blind Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the combination treatment effectiveness of using rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Our study aim to evaluate the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment with the combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe 10mg in patients with chronic coronary artery disease compared with 20 mg rosuvastatin. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment with the target of LDL-c < 1.4 mmol/L between combination therapy with rosuvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg in patients with chronic coronary artery disease compared with monotherapy increasing the dose of rosuvastatin 20 mg in Vietnam. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blind, parallel-group with a 1:1 randomized ratio in 103 outpatients with chronic coronary syndromes treated with rosuvastatin 10mg daily. Group A received the combination therapy with rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily, and group B received rosuvastatin 20 mg daily. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein - cholesterol (LDL-c) control between rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg versus rosuvastatin 20 mg after 4 weeks and 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of intervention, the proportion of archived treatment target patients with LDL-c < 1.4 mmol/L in groups A and B was 69.2% and 44.2%, respectively (Risk ratio (RR) = 1.57, p < 0.01), 50% LDL reduction was 27.9% and 55.8%, respectively (RR = 2.00, p < 0.01), and archived both targets were 51.9% and 25.6% (RR = 2.03, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Group A's LDL-c reduction effect and target achievement proportion (Rosuvastatin 10mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg) were significantly higher than Group B's (Rosuvastatin 20 mg). Both medication therapies were safe in patients, and the increased dose of monotherapy showed more side effects than the combination therapy.

Preliminary Consequences of Blood Pressure Management and Blood Homocysteine Levels with Perindopril in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients in the Vietnamese Population.

Background: Perindopril is an ACE inhibitor that aids in both blood pressure regulation and homocysteine reduction. Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the results of controlling blood pressure and blood homocysteine levels by perindopril in patients with primary hypertension. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with a longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 105 primary hypertensive patients treated with perindopril. Results: The results of our study showed that after 6 weeks of treatment with perindopril, the proportion of patients with the target blood pressure (BP) level accounted for 70.5%, the rate of grade 1 hypertension decreased from 61.0% to 25.7%, grade 2 blood pressure decreased from 17.1% to 3.8%, and there was no case of grade 3 hypertension. At the same time, we also found that the rate of BP control in the group of patients who controlled Hcy below a threshold of 15 µmol/L was significantly higher than in the other group (p < 0.05). Concerning the efficacy of decreasing homocysteine in blood, we discovered that after 6 weeks of treatment with perindopril, the proportion of patients with elevated homocysteine reduced considerably from 74.3% to 40% (p < 0.05). In addition, the homocysteine concentration was 4.33 mol/L lower after treatment than before treatment (95% CI: 3.69-4.97) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Perindopril helps control blood pressure and reduces blood homocysteine levels in patients with primary hypertension.

The Effect of Bisoprolol on Premature Ventricular Complex in Vietnamese Patients with Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) is a common arrhythmia that causes a large number of clinical symptoms, adversely impacts the quality of life, and can even initiate serious arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The incidence of premature ventricular contraction is higher in hypertensive patients, particularly if concomitant left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is present. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted on the characteristics of PVC in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and aimed to evaluate the effect of bisoprolol on PVC in Vietnamese patients with hypertension and LVH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study to determine how bisoprolol potency affected PVC management in the group with both high blood pressure and LVH. We selected a convenient sample of all patients who came to the Medical Examination Department at the Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital and met sampling criteria with hypertension, LVH on echocardiography, and PVC on 12-leads electrocardiogram. Over 2 years, we collected 76 patients who satisfied the above conditions. Out of which, 50 patients were indicated for management with bisoprolol, and 26 patients were excluded from the study, including 7 patients with asthma and 19 patients who had simple PVC on a 24-hour Holter ECG. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Fifty patients participated in the study, of whom 70% were female. It is clear that palpitation was the most prevalent symptom (66%), and 38% of patients had complicated PVC (Lown III-V). When treating PVC with bisoprolol, 50% of patients achieved the treatment goal with a decrease in the number of PVCs of more than 70%, accompanied by symptom relief and eradication of dangerous PVCs. After 4 weeks of treatment, bisoprolol decreased the number of PVCs, heart rate, and blood pressure while also easing PVC-related symptoms (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Low-dose bisoprolol effectively reduces the number of PVCs in hypertensive patients with LVH.