Randomized clinical trial of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunctive treatment for small-area thermal burns in children.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the acute management of burns remains unclear. The purpose of this trial was to compare standard Acticoat™ and Mepitel™ dressings with combined Acticoat™, Mepitel™ and continuous NPWT to determine the effect of adjunctive NPWT on re-epithelialization in paediatric burns. METHODS: This two-arm, single-centre RCT recruited children with acute thermal burns covering less than 5 per cent of their total body surface area. The primary outcome was time to re-epithelialization. Blinded assessments were performed using photographs captured every 3-5 days until discharge. Secondary measures included pain, itch, grafting, perfusion and scar management referrals. RESULTS: Some 114 patients were randomized. Median time to re-epithelialization was 8 (i.q.r. 7-11) days in the NPWT group and 10 (8-14) days in the control group. In a multivariable model, NPWT decreased the expected time to wound closure by 22 (95 per cent c.i. 7 to 34) per cent (P = 0·005). The risk of referral to scar management was reduced by 60 (18 to 81) per cent (P = 0·013). Four participants in the control group and one in the NPWT group underwent grafting. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in pain, itch or laser Doppler measures of perfusion. Adverse events were rare and minor, although NPWT carried a moderate treatment burden, with ten patients discontinuing early. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive NPWT hastened re-epithelialization in small-area burn injuries in children, but had a greater treatment burden than standard dressings alone. Registration number: ACTRN12618000256279 ( http://ANZCTR.org.au).

ANTECEDENTES: La eficacia del tratamiento de las heridas con presión negativa (negative pressure wound therapy, NPWT) en el tratamiento agudo de las quemaduras sigue sin estar claro. El propósito de este ensayo clínico fue comparar los apósitos estándar del tipo Acticoat™ y Mepitel™ con la combinación de Acticoat™, Mepitel™ y NPWT continua para determinar el efecto de la adición de NPWT en la reepitelización de las quemaduras en pediatría. MÉTODOS: Ensayo controlado y aleatorizado, con dos brazos y unicéntrico, que reclutó niños con quemaduras térmicas agudas que afectaban < 5% de la superficie corporal total. El resultado primario fue el tiempo hasta la reepitelización. Se realizaron evaluaciones a ciegas utilizando fotografías tomadas cada 3-5 días hasta el alta hospitalaria. Las medidas secundarias incluían dolor, picor, injerto, perfusión y derivación para el tratamiento de las cicatrices. RESULTADOS: Se aleatorizaron un total de 114 pacientes. La mediana de tiempo hasta la reepitelización fue 8 días (rango intercuartílico, interquartile range, IQR 7-11) en el grupo NPWT y 10 días (8-14) en el grupo control. En el modelo multivariable, el uso de NPWT disminuyó los días previstos hasta el cierre de la herida en un 22% (i.c. del 95% 7-34%; P = 0,005). El riesgo de ser derivado para el tratamiento de la cicatriz se redujo en un 60% (18-81%; P = 0,013). Cuatro participantes en el grupo control y uno en el grupo NPWT fueron sometidos a injertos. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el dolor, picor, o mediciones de la perfusión con Doppler laser. Los eventos adversos fueron raros y menores, aunque NPWT conllevó una carga de tratamiento moderada con 10 pacientes que lo suspendieron precozmente. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento complementario de la herida con presión negativa acelera el tiempo hasta la reepitelización en quemaduras de pequeña extensión en niños, pero implica una mayor carga de tratamiento.

Baseline parameters for rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in healthy pregnant Australian women: a comparison of labouring and non-labouring women at term.

BACKGROUND: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) is a point-of-care coagulation test. Reference ranges in non-labouring women have recently been established from a cohort of women presenting for elective caesarean delivery using the recommended minimum sample size of 120. This study aimed to present baseline parameters for labouring and non-labouring women and to compare the mean values of these ROTEM® parameters. METHODS: Ethical approval was granted for an opt-out recruitment approach for labouring women and written consent was obtained from non-labouring women (data published previously). ROTEM® testing was performed in these two cohorts at term gestation. Women with any condition affecting coagulation were excluded. ROTEM® Delta reference ranges were derived by calculating the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles for INTEM/EXTEM/FIBTEM amplitude at 5 min (A5), coagulation time (CT), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and clot formation time (CFT). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one labouring and 132 non-labouring women met inclusion criteria. The mean values for selected ROTEM® parameters for labouring and non-labouring women respectively were: FIBTEM A5, 21.05 and 19.7 mm (P=0.008); EXTEM A5, 54.8 and 53.2 mm (P=0.025); and EXTEM CT, 52.2 and 53.7 s (P=0.049). Significant differences between the groups were observed in measures of clotting onset and clot firmness. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a significant decrease in the mean time-to-clotting onset in labouring women compared with non-labouring women. Mean values for measures of clot firmness were greater in labouring women. In comparison to previously established ROTEM® baseline parameters for non-labouring women, this study provides evidence that there is greater hyper-coagulability in labouring women.

Menstrual Suppression in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Disabilities Ranging from Developmental to Acquired Conditions: A Population Study in an Australian Quaternary Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Service from January 2005 to December 2015.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the efficacy of different medical modalities for menstrual suppression in the cohort of patients with disabilities who presented to the Queensland Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology (PAG) Service between January 2005 and December 2015. Menstrual suppression in adolescents with disabilities is an important aspect of care to support the patient and their carers in managing the complexities of menstrual hygiene, pain, and other discomfort associated with menses. It is important for general practitioners, pediatricians, and gynecologists to establish the right modality of suppression for each individual adolescent. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study was a retrospective case notes review of 68 adolescents who presented to the Queensland PAG Service, Brisbane, Australia with a request for menstrual suppression. The medical interventions included treatment with either combined oral hormonal contraceptive, oral medroxyprogesterone, depot medroxyprogesterone, or the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena, Bayer). The primary outcome measure was success of menstrual suppression from commencement of medical intervention to achievement of complete amenorrhea or very light bleeding described as spotting, for each medical modality. Secondary outcomes were length of time from first treatment to first observed menstrual suppression, and the number of outpatient appointments taken to achieve menstrual suppression. RESULTS: Of the 68 adolescents, 59/68 (86.8%) successfully achieved menstrual suppression, with 9/68 (13.2%) having ongoing treatment or loss to follow-up at the time of conclusion of the study; 39/68 (57.4%) were menstrually suppressed with their chosen medical modality after their initial appointment. CONCLUSION: Medical modalities are highly effective in achieving menstrual suppression and no young women at this institution required a hysterectomy. Depot medroxyprogesterone was the most successful modality used to achieve menstrual suppression followed by the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The combined oral hormonal contraceptive was the least successful medical treatment in achieving menstrual suppression.

Towards a clinical and empirical definition of burn scarring: A template analysis using qualitative data.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the nature, scope or meaning of the concept 'burn scar', from the perspective of adults and children with burn scarring, caregivers of children with burn scarring and health professionals who were considered experts in the treatment of burn scarring. The impact of the identified characteristics on burn scar health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was also examined. METHOD: Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, 43 transcripts from semi-structured interviews with people with burn scars (n=10 adults and n=11 children), their caregivers (n=9) and health professionals (n=13) were analyzed using template analysis. RESULTS: Ten characteristics of burn scars were identified by health professionals: 'stretchability', 'hardness', 'raised', 'thickness', 'surface area', 'scar sensitivity', 'scar surface appearance', 'hydration', 'fragility', and 'color'. However, 'thickness', 'scar surface area' and 'hydration' were not described by children with burn scars and 'scar surface area' was not described by adults with burn scars or caregivers. All groups (adults, children, caregivers and health professional) perceived that the burn scar characteristics of 'stretchability' and 'scar sensitivity' impacted upon all indicators of burn scar HRQOL. The burn scar characteristics of 'fragility', 'scar surface appearance' and 'color' were largely perceived by all groups to impact upon the emotional and physical indicators of burn scar HRQOL alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified there are differences in the burn scar characteristics considered important by health professionals and those characteristics that adult/child/caregivers perceived to impact on indicators of burn scar HRQOL. It is recommended that outcome measures of burn scarring include the burn scar characteristics of 'stretchability' and 'scar sensitivity' at a minimum. The inclusion of 'fragility', 'scar surface appearance' and 'color' should also be considered.

A review of campfire burns in children: The QLD experience.

INTRODUCTION: Campfire burns in children are a significant health issue. It is imperative that the extent of the problem is examined and strategies discussed to inform future prevention campaigns. METHOD: A retrospective review of data from the Queensland Paediatric Burns Registry for all children presenting with campfire burns between January 2013 and December 2014 (inclusive). Information collected included patient demographics, detail regarding mechanism of injury, first aid, Total Body Surface Area (TBSA), burn depth, and treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-five children with campfire burns were seen in our paediatric burns centre during this 2-year period. The median age of patients was 3 years (range 10 days-14 years). The hands and feet were the areas most commonly affected. Eleven percent of patients suffered flame burns, whilst 89% suffered contact burns from the hot coals or ashes. Of the latter group, approximately half experienced burns from campfires that had been extinguished for at least one night. Thirteen percent of patients underwent split thickness skin grafting. The incidence of burns was increased during school holiday months. DISCUSSION: We have previously demonstrated the effectiveness of targeted campaigns in reducing the incidence of campfire burns. A significant portion of patients sustained burns from incorrectly extinguished campfires. These injuries are likely to be preventable with ongoing public awareness campaigns.

Hot tea and tiny tots don't mix: A cross-sectional survey on hot beverage scalds.

OBJECTIVE: Hot beverage scalds are a leading cause of burns in young children. The aim of this study was to look at the circumstances surrounding these injuries in terms of setting, mechanism, supervision and first aid to inform a prevention campaign. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was delivered via iPad to parents and caregivers presenting with a child aged 0-36 months with a hot beverage scald at a major paediatric burns centre. RESULTS: Of the 101 children aged 0-36 months that presented with a hot beverage scald over a 12-month period, 54 participants were included. The scald aetiology was as expected with the peak prevalence in children aged 6-24 months, pulling a cup of hot liquid down over themselves. The majority of injuries occurred in the child's home and were witnessed by the caregiver or parent. The supervising adult was often in close proximity when the scald occurred. Less than a third (28%) of participants received recommended first aid treatment at the scene, with an additional 18% receiving this treatment with three hours of the injury-usually at an emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: While the aetiology of these scalds were as expected, the low use of recommended burn first aid was of concern. Although supervision was present in almost all cases, with the parent/caregiver close-by, this proximity still permitted injury. Attentiveness and continuity of supervision, which can be difficult with competing parental demands, appear to play a more important role role; as do considerations of other safety mechanisms such as hazard reduction through keeping hot drinks out of reach and engineering factors such as improved cup design. By incorporating the findings from this study and other research into a hot beverage scald prevention campaign, we hope to see a change in knowledge and behaviour in parents and caregivers of young children, and ultimately a reduction in the incidence of hot beverage scalds.

Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Partial thickness burns of up to 10% total body surface area (TBSA) in children are common injuries primarily treated in the outpatient setting using expensive silver-containing dressings. However, economic evaluations in the paediatric burns population are lacking to assist healthcare providers when choosing which dressing to use. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of three silver dressings for partial thickness burns ≤10% TBSA in children aged 0-15 years using days to full wound re-epithelialization as the health outcome. METHOD: This study was a trial based economic evaluation (incremental cost effectiveness) conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. Ninety-six children participated in the trial investigating Acticoat™, Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ or Mepilex Ag™. Costs directly related to the management of partial thickness burns ≤10% TBSA were collected during the trial from March 2013 to July 2014 and for a one year after re-epithelialization time horizon. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were estimated and dominance probabilities calculated from bootstrap resampling trial data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the potential effect of accounting for infrequent, but high cost, skin grafting surgical procedures. RESULTS: Costs (dressing, labour, analgesics, scar management) were considerably lower in the Mepilex Ag™ group (median AUD$94.45) compared to the Acticoat™ (median $244.90) and Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ (median $196.66) interventions. There was a 99% and 97% probability that Mepilex Ag™ dominated (cheaper and more effective than) Acticoat™ and Acticoat™ with Mepitel™, respectively. This pattern of dominance was consistent across raw cost and effects, after a priori adjustments, and sensitivity analyses. There was an 82% probability that Acticoat™ with Mepitel dominated Acticoat™ in the primary analysis, although this probability was sensitive to the effect of skin graft procedures. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation has demonstrated that Mepilex Ag™ was the dominant dressing choice over both Acticoat™ and Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ in this trial-based economic evaluation and is recommended for treatment of paediatric partial thickness burns ≤10% TBSA.

The reproducibility and clinical utility of the 3D camera for measuring scar height, with a protocol for administration.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the reproducibility and clinical utility of a 3D camera for measuring burn scar height in adults. METHODS: Participants from a larger prospective longitudinal study were included. Reproducibility data were collected using an immediate test-retest interval and a 1-2 week test-retest interval and included reliability and agreement. The LifeViz™ 3D camera was used to measure scar height. Reproducibility was tested using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), percentage agreement within 1 mm between test and retest, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change (SDC) and Bland Altman limits of agreement. RESULTS: Burn scar images from 55 adult participants were included. Intra-rater reliability was acceptable using an immediate retest interval (maximum and minimum height ICC=0.85, 0.86 respectively). Agreement using an immediate retest interval was borderline acceptable (maximum and minimum height SDC=1.11, 0.69 respectively) to detect changes of close to 1 mm. Reproducibility was largely not acceptable using a 1-2 week test-retest interval (eg, maximum and minimum height ICC=0.34, 0.68 respectively; maximum and minimum height SDC=2.66, 1.16). The clinical utility of the camera was supported for scars over relatively flat areas and well-defined border margins. A protocol for administration of the camera was developed. CONCLUSION: The 3D camera appears capable of detecting gross changes or differences in scar height above the normal skin surface, in adults with scars over relatively flat areas and well-defined border margins. However, further testing of reproducibility using a shorter test-retest interval than 1-2 week retest is recommended to confirm the suitability of the device for measuring changes or differences in scar height.

Inaccurate, inadequate and inconsistent: A content analysis of burn first aid information online.

OBJECTIVE: With the popularity of the Internet as a primary source of health-related information, the aim of this website content analysis was to assess the accuracy and quality of burn first aid information available on the Internet. METHODS: Using the search term 'burn first aid' in four popular search engines, the first 10 websites from each search engine were recorded. From a total of 40 websites recorded, 14 websites were evaluated after removing duplicates. Websites were assessed on content accuracy by four independent reviewers with checks conducted on inter-rater reliability. Website quality was recorded based on Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) principles. RESULTS: Country of origin for the 14 websites was the US (7), Australia (6), and New Zealand (1). The mean content accuracy score was 5.6 out of 10. The mean website quality score was 6.6 out of 12. Australasian websites scored lower for quality but higher for accuracy. The US websites scored higher for quality than accuracy. Website usability and accuracy in a crisis situation were also assessed. The median crisis usability score was 3 out of five, and the median crisis accuracy score was 3.5 out of five. CONCLUSIONS: The inaccurate and inconsistent burn first aid treatments that appear online are reflected in the often-incorrect burn first aid treatments seen in patients attending emergency departments. Global consistency in burn first aid information is needed to avoid confusion by members of the public.

Cool Runnings - an app-based intervention for reducing hot drink scalds: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Globally, burns are the fifth leading cause of non-fatal children's injuries, and the leading cause of childhood burns is hot beverage scalds. Although there have been a number of programmes aimed at preventing scalds in children, very few have specifically addressed hot beverage scalds, and fewer have reported a reduction in injury rates. In Australia, hot beverage scalds account for 18 % of all childhood burns - a figure that has remained constant for the past decade. Innovative new technologies, such as Smartphone applications (apps), present a novel way for delivering individual-level injury prevention messages. The low cost, scalability and broad reach make this technology an ideal channel for health interventions. One of the latest methods being used in health-related apps aimed at behaviour change is gamification. Gamification uses the gaming principles of rewards, competition and personalisation to engage participants and motivate them towards preferred behaviours. This intervention will use a Smartphone app-based platform that combines gamification and behaviour-change strategies to increase knowledge and awareness of hot beverage scald risks and burn first aid among mothers of young children. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a two-group, parallel, single-blinded randomised control trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of a Smartphone app-based injury prevention intervention. The primary outcome measure is change in knowledge. Change in knowledge is measured in three components: knowledge of correct burns first aid; knowledge of the main cause of burns/scalds in children aged 0-15yrs; knowledge of the main age group at risk for burns/scalds. The secondary outcome measures relate to the gamification methods, measuring participants frequency of engagement with the Cool Runnings app. Queensland-based mothers aged 18+ years who own a Smartphone and have at least one child aged 5-12 months are eligible to participate. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate an app-based delivery of injury prevention messages, and the first study to test the efficacy of gamification techniques in an injury prevention intervention. If this intervention is found to be effective, this RCT will provide a platform for targeting other childhood injury prevention campaigns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on 14 January 2016 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12616000019404 ).

Scar outcome of children with partial thickness burns: A 3 and 6 month follow up.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of research investigating the scar outcome of children with partial thickness burns. The aim of this study was to assess the scar outcome of children with partial thickness burns who received a silver dressing acutely. METHOD: Children aged 0-15 years with an acute partial thickness burn, ≤10% TBSA were included. Children were originally recruited for an RCT investigating three dressings for partial thickness burns. Children were assessed at 3 and 6 months after re-epithelialization. 3D photographs were taken of the burn site, POSAS was completed and skin thickness was measured using ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Forty-three children returned for 3 and 6 month follow-ups or returned a photo. Days to re-epithelialization was a significant predictor of skin/scar quality at 3 and 6 months (p<0.01). Patient-rated color and observer-rated vascularity and pigmentation POSAS scores were comparable at 3 months (color vs. vascularity 0.88, p<0.001; color vs. pigmentation 0.64, p<0.001), but patients scored higher than the observer at 6 months (color vs. vascularity 0.57, p<0.05; color vs. pigmentation 0.15, p=0.60). Burn depth was significantly correlated with skin thickness (r=0.51, p<0.01). Hypopigmentation of the burn site was present in 25.8% of children who re-epithelialized in ≤ 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: This study has provided information on outcomes for children with partial thickness burns and highlighted a need for further education of this population.

Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the effects of three silver dressing combinations on small to medium size acute partial thickness burns in children, focusing on re-epithelialization time, pain and distress during dressing changes. METHOD: Children (0-15 years) with clean, ≤ 10% total body surface area (TBSA) partial thickness burns who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Children received either (1) Acticoat™; (2) Acticoat™ with Mepitel™; or (3) Mepilex Ag™ dressings. Measures of burn re-epithelialization, pain, and distress were recorded at dressing changes every 3-5 days until full re-epithelialization occurred. RESULTS: One hundred and three children were recruited with 96 children included for analysis. No infections were detected for the course of the study. When adjusted for burn depth, Acticoat™ significantly increased the expected days to full re-epithelialization by 40% (IRR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.14-1.73, p < 0.01) and Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ significantly increased the expected days to full re-epithelialization by 33% (IRR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.08-1.63, p ≤ 0.01) when compared to Mepilex Ag™. Expected FLACC scores in the Mepilex Ag™ group were 32% lower at dressing removal (p = 0.01) and 37% lower at new dressing application (p = 0.04); and scores in the Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ group were 23% lower at dressing removal (p = 0.04) and 40% lower at new dressing application (p < 0.01), in comparison to the Acticoat™ group. Expected Visual Analog Scale-Pain (VAS-P) scores were 25% lower in the Mepilex Ag™ group at dressing removal (p = 0.04) and 34% lower in the Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ group (p = 0.02) at new dressing application in comparison to the Acticoat™ group. There was no significant difference between the Mepilex Ag™ and the Acticoat™ with Mepitel™ groups at all timepoints and with any pain measure. CONCLUSION: Mepilex Ag™ is an effective silver dressing, in terms of accelerated wound re-epithelialization time (compared to Acticoat™ and Acticoat™ with Mepitel™) and decreased pain during dressing changes (compared to Acticoat™), for clean, < 10% TBSA partial thickness burns in children.

3D photography is a reliable burn wound area assessment tool compared to digital planimetry in very young children.

BACKGROUND: Reliability and validity of 3D photography (3D LifeViz™ System) compared to digital planimetry (Visitrak™) has been established in a compliant cohort of children with acute burns. Further research is required to investigate these assessment tools in children representative of the general pediatric burns population, specifically children under the age of three years. AIM: To determine if 3D photography is a reliable wound assessment tool compared to Visitrak™ in children of all ages with acute burns ≤10% TBSA. METHOD: Ninety-six children (median age 1 year 9 months) who presented to the Royal Children's Hospital Brisbane with an acute burn ≤10% TBSA were recruited into the study. Wounds were measured at the first dressing change using the Visitrak™ system and 3D photography. All measurements were completed by one investigator and level of agreement between wound surface area measurements was calculated. RESULTS: Wound surface area measurements were complete (i.e. participants had measurements from both techniques) for 75 participants. Level of agreement between wound surface area measurements calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was excellent (ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97). Visitrak™ tracings could not be completed in 19 participants with 16 aged less than two years. 3D photography could not be completed for one participant. Barriers to completing tracings were: excessive movement, pain, young age or wound location (e.g. face or perineum). CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed 3D photography as a reliable alternative to digital planimetry in children of all ages with acute burns ≤10% TBSA. In addition, 3D photography is more suitable for very young children given its non-invasive nature.

Paediatric burns patients: Reasons for admission at a tertiary centre.

AIM AND METHOD: The aim of this study was to determine the reasons why children with burns are admitted upon primary presentation to a tertiary burns centre. The study was a retrospective chart review of all children admitted to the Stuart Pegg Paediatric Burns Centre with a burns injury over an 18 month period. RESULTS: A total of 159 children with an overall median age of 25 months were included in the study. The reason for admission was able to be determined in all but two of these patients, and categorised into either severity, region of body burnt, social reasons, timing of presentation, geographical reasons, age and other. The majority of children (45%) were admitted for severity, followed by region of body burnt (24%) and social reasons (11%). One third of children were admitted because of reasons other than the biology of the burn itself (severity or body region). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that it is not just children with severe burns who are admitted. One third of children are admitted because of the impact of the burn injury on the family, not because of a need for immediate management of the burns injury itself. The full impact of paediatric burns on our healthcare system is not solely determined by the physical characteristics of the burn itself.

A prospective observational study investigating all children presenting to a specialty paediatric burns centre.

AIM AND METHOD: The aim of this study was to describe the mechanism of injury and outcome of all children who presented to The Stuart Pegg Paediatric Burns Centre (SPPBC) with a burn injury in the year 2013. A detailed proforma was completed prospectively at time of presentation to hospital. RESULTS: During the one year period, 758 children with a median age of 2 years 3 months presented with a burn injury. Overall, 12.7% of patients (n=96) were initially treated as inpatients. Similarities existed between in and outpatients. Over half the children admitted had a scald injury (53.1%). Whilst slightly higher than the outpatient scald rate of 43.1% there was no statistical significant difference. However, there was a significant difference between inpatients and outpatients with respect to other mechanisms of injury. Contact burns were under represented in inpatients (27.1%) compared to outpatients (44.5%), p<0.05. In contrast, flame burns were over represented in inpatients, 11.5% compared to outpatients, 2.9% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Paediatric burns are a common cause of childhood injury. The majority of children present with small to medium sized partial thickness injuries and are managed as outpatients. In order to understand the true impact of paediatric burn injury and to develop appropriate targeted injury prevention campaigns, data repositories must include detailed information regarding outpatient paediatric burns.

3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.

BACKGROUND: In the paediatric population careful attention needs to be made concerning techniques utilised for wound assessment to minimise discomfort and stress to the child. AIM: To investigate whether 3D photography is a valid measure of burn wound area in children compared to the current clinical gold standard method of digital planimetry using Visitrak™. METHOD: Twenty-five children presenting to the Stuart Pegg Paediatric Burn Centre for burn dressing change following acute burn injury were included in the study. Burn wound area measurement was undertaken using both digital planimetry (Visitrak™ system) and 3D camera analysis. Inter-rater reliability of the 3D camera software was determined by three investigators independently assessing the burn wound area. RESULTS: A comparison of wound area was assessed using intraclass correlation co-efficients (ICC) which demonstrated excellent agreement 0.994 (CI 0.986, 0.997). Inter-rater reliability measured using ICC 0.989 (95% CI 0.979, 0.995) demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability. Time taken to map the wound was significantly quicker using the camera at bedside compared to Visitrak™ 14.68 (7.00)s versus 36.84 (23.51)s (p<0.001). In contrast, analysing wound area was significantly quicker using the Visitrak™ tablet compared to Dermapix(®) software for the 3D Images 31.36 (19.67)s versus 179.48 (56.86)s (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that images taken with the 3D LifeViz™ camera and assessed with Dermapix(®) software is a reliable method for wound area assessment in the acute paediatric burn setting.

The obstructed hemivagina, ipsilateral renal anomaly, and uterine didelphys triad and the subsequent manifestation of cervical aplasia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare a case series of the obstructed hemivagina, ipsilateral renal anomaly and uterine didelphys triad with the literature, with a focus on a subset of patients with cervical aplasia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective case series was conducted of all patients with the triad managed between 2005-2013 at a tertiary center for adolescent gynecology. RESULTS: Similarities in this cohort, compared to the literature, included heterogeneity of presentation, presence of endometriosis, and asymmetry of affected side. Notable differences included 1 patient with a 16p11.2 microdeletion and 2 patients with subsequent unilateral cervical aplasia. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis. Vaginal septum division was performed in 8 cases and excision in 1 case. Both cases with cervical aplasia ultimately underwent hemi-hysterectomy, and highlight the implications of this rare variant in regards to its existence, limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in this context, and suggestions for improvement in diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: The complexity of these cases, especially the evolving manifestation of cervical aplasia postoperatively, illustrates the need to recognize limitations in imaging and divergence in definitive management.

A novel technology approach to pain management in children with burns: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological approaches to supporting young children through painful medical procedures are an essential component of burn pain management protocols. New technology developed from collaborations between healthcare professionals and IT teams can enhance the preparation and distraction approaches used with children. This study follows on from previous studies using such technology, and aim to determine whether levels of pain and distress using a combined preparation and distraction content can be further reduced, and offer more efficient clinical outcomes. METHODS: Forty children (3-10 years) undergoing acute burn care procedures were randomized to two groups: (1) Standard Distraction (SD) Group and (2) Multi Modal Distraction (MMD) Group (combined protocol of procedural preparation and distraction). Pain intensity and child distress were measured prior to and during the procedure. Clinical utility end points were also included; length of treatment, days to healing and adverse pain events. RESULTS: A combined MMD protocol significantly reduced pain intensity (p<0.001) and distress scores (p<0.001) when compared to SD. Length of treatment (p<0.05), days to healing and the number of pain adverse events were also reduced (p<0.05) with the use of the MMD protocol. CONCLUSIONS: A combined MMD protocol reduces the pain experiences for young children during burn care procedures. When compared with a previous MMD trial, outcomes reiterated the use of procedural preparation as an essential component of non-pharmacological approaches. In addition to minimizing pain and distress, this innovative technology reduced treatment length and pain adverse events, and may have an impact on reducing days to healing, providing evidence of clinical efficacy and utility.

The use of Acticoat in neonatal burns.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Acticoat use in primary burn injuries and other skin injuries in premature neonates. PROCEDURES: An audit of eight premature neonates who sustained burn injuries and other cutaneous injuries from various agents were treated with Acticoat. Serum silver levels were measured in three neonates. Wounds were assessed for infection and blood cultures were taken where sepsis was suspected. FINDINGS: Neonates ranged from 23 to 28 weeks gestation (weight: 578-1078 g). Causative injury mechanisms included: alcoholic chlorhexidine, alcoholic wipes, electrode jelly, extravasated intravenous fluids, artery illuminator, temperature probe and adhesive tape removal. Total burned body surface area ranged from 1 to 30%. All neonates were treated with Acticoat dressing changed every 3-7 days. All wounds re-epithelialised by day 28 and scar management was not required. There were four mortalities secondary to problems associated with extreme prematurity. Serum silver levels ranged from 0 to 1 micromol/L. There were no wound infections or positive blood cultures during the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Acticoat is a suitable dressing for premature neonates who have sustained burn injury, with the advantage of minimal handling as the dressing need only be changed every 3-7 days.