Assessing Clinically Significant Cognitive Impairment Using the NIH Toolbox in Individuals with Co-occurring Serious Mental Illness and Alcohol Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Serious mental illnesses (SMI) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) co-occurrence (SMI-AUD) is common, yet little is known about the prevalence and risk factors of cognitive impairment for this population. We used the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox to identify clinically significant cognitive impairment (CSCI), describe the cognitive profile, and investigate whether psychiatric and AUD severity measures are associated with CSCI in individuals with SMI-AUD. METHODS: CSCI was defined as 2 or more fully corrected fluid subtest T scores below a set threshold based on an individual's crystalized composite score. Psychiatric severity measures included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V (SCID-5) for SMI diagnosis and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. AUD severity measures included the SCID-5 for AUD symptom severity score, years of alcohol use, and urine ethyl glucuronide levels. A multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the adjusted effects of each variable on the probability of CSCI. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (N = 55/135) of our sample had CSCI compared with the base rate of 15% from the NIH Toolbox normative sample. Subtests measuring executive function most frequently contributed to meeting criteria for CSCI (Flanker and Dimensional Change Card Sort). A history of head injury ( P = 0.033), increased AUD symptom severity score ( P = 0.007) and increased negative symptom severity score ( P = 0.027) were associated with CSCI. CONCLUSIONS: Cognition should be considered in the treatment of people with SMI-AUD, particularly in those with history of brain injury, higher AUD symptom severity, and/or negative symptom severity.

Cognitive impairment of acute onset in the Consortium to Investigate Vascular Impairment of Cognition (CIVIC) study: occurrence, correlates, and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Having demonstrated that dementia of acute onset represents a distinct syndrome with distinct outcomes, the authors investigated whether similar attributes describe cognitive impairment of acute onset (CIAO). METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of the Consortium to Investigate Vascular Impairment of Cognition study. RESULTS: Ninety patients met our criteria for CIAO. Compared with cognitive impairment of gradual onset, CIAO was associated with vascular features (odds ratio [OR]: 12.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-47.9), dementias other than Alzheimer disease (OR: 6.5, 95% CI: 2.1-20.8), and decreased survival (hazard ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CIAO are clinically identifiable and have distinct outcomes.

Dementia of acute onset in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

BACKGROUND: Although most people with dementia experience an insidious onset of symptoms, in some cases onset can be acute. The importance of acute onset is unclear. Some reports suggest that it portends a worse course. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the clinical examination cohort (n=2914) of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA). We defined "acute onset of dementia" from the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders in the Elderly (CAMDEX) questionnaire, conducted with an informant. People with dementia of acute onset were compared to those with dementia of insidious onset for development of adverse outcomes of death and institutionalization over 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 1132 people who had dementia, 130 (11.5%) met criteria for acute onset. Compared with gradual-onset dementia patients, those with acute-onset dementia were more often men (42% vs. 30%, p < 0.05), resided in nursing homes (75% vs. 63%, p< 0.05), had vascular risk factors (72% vs. 47%, p < 0.05), and a Hachinski Ischemia Scale (HIS) score > or = 7 (64% vs. 19%, p < 0.05). More patients with dementia of acute onset than gradual onset were diagnosed with vascular dementia (55% vs. 13%; p < 0.05). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for survival and institutionalization in the acute-onset group were 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.2] and 0.76 (95% CI 0.4-1.3), respectively, compared with the gradual-onset group. CONCLUSIONS: People with acute-onset dementia had more vascular risk factors than those with gradual-onset dementia across all dementia diagnoses, and lower risks of institutionalization but worse survival. Routine inquiry about the onset of dementia might help to better clarify prognoses in patients with dementia.