Decision-making in anesthesiology: will artificial intelligence make intraoperative care safer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article explores the impact of recent applications of artificial intelligence on clinical anesthesiologists' decision-making. RECENT FINDINGS: Naturalistic decision-making, a rich research field that aims to understand how cognitive work is accomplished in complex environments, provides insight into anesthesiologists' decision processes. Due to the complexity of clinical work and limits of human decision-making (e.g. fatigue, distraction, and cognitive biases), attention on the role of artificial intelligence to support anesthesiologists' decision-making has grown. Artificial intelligence, a computer's ability to perform human-like cognitive functions, is increasingly used in anesthesiology. Examples include aiding in the prediction of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative complications, as well as enhancing structure localization for regional and neuraxial anesthesia through artificial intelligence integration with ultrasound. SUMMARY: To fully realize the benefits of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology, several important considerations must be addressed, including its usability and workflow integration, appropriate level of trust placed on artificial intelligence, its impact on decision-making, the potential de-skilling of practitioners, and issues of accountability. Further research is needed to enhance anesthesiologists' clinical decision-making in collaboration with artificial intelligence.

Updates in the Management of Perioperative Vasoplegic Syndrome.

Vasoplegic syndrome occurs relatively frequently in cardiac surgery, liver transplant, major noncardiac surgery, in post-return of spontaneous circulation situations, and in pateints with sepsis. It is paramount for the anesthesiologist to understand both the pathophysiology of vasoplegia and the different treatment strategies available for rescuing a patient from life-threatening hypotension.

Fluids and Organ Dysfunction: A Narrative Review of the Literature and Discussion of 5 Controversial Topics.

Evidence-based clinical decision making is at the forefront of modern cardiothoracic anesthesia practice. Therefore, as a field, cardiac anesthesiologist should strive to ensure that the available evidence is of the highest possible quality. In this narrative review, 5 important topics that the authors believe require additional investigation in cardiothoracic anesthesia and critical care related to fluid therapy and organ dysfunction are outlined briefly. In particular, the authors believe that the areas of pulmonary artery catheter use, restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies, cardiopulmonary bypass prime composition, colloid use in resuscitation and its effects on acute kidney injury, and management of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery hold many unanswered questions and opportunities for continued improvement in the specialty of cardiac anesthesia. This article accompanies a presentation at the 46th Association of Cardiac Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting on October 22, 2017.