Cytopathogenicity of acanthamoeba, vahlkampfia and hartmannella: quantative & qualitative in vitro studies on keratocytes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cytopathogenicity of Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella clinical isolates with a type culture of Acanthamoeba castellanii. METHODS: The cytopathic effect produced during 24 h co-incubation with cultured keratocytes was assessed at set time intervals. Formal quantative studies involved image analysis of the area of cells remaining after 6 h. The mechanism of cytopathogenicity was elucidated using time-lapse video, light and scanning electron microscopy. The ability to produce cell damage in the absence of physical contact was studied using the transwell apparatus. The role of apotosis was also investigated. RESULTS: All three isolates produced near destruction of the keratocyte monolayer within 24 h, although initial cell destruction was more rapid with Acanthamoeba. For all three genera, the mechanism of cell damage involved physical attack and trogocytosis: cytopathic products were also implicated as cell damage was produced in the absence of physical contact, but apoptosis was not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: While the results do not prove that Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella are pathogens, they provide important evidence supporting the thesis that they cause keratitis by demonstrating that their ability to produce a cytopathic effect on keratocytes in vitro is similar in magnitude and mechanism to that of the known pathogen Acanthamoeba castellanii. The mechanisms by which small free-living amoebae produce cell damage is poorly understood. The ability of genera of amoebae other than Acanthamoeba to produce corneal infection remains controversial. In this study, the cytopathogenicity of Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella isolated from a case human keratitis are compared both quantitatively and qualitatively with that to the known pathogen Acanthamoeba castellanii. The results suggest that representatives of each of the 3 genera produce a similar degree of cytopathic effect on keratocytes after 24h of co-incubation and that a combination of physical and chemical factors are responsible.

Amebic keratitis in a wearer of disposable contact lenses due to a mixed Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella infection.

PURPOSE: To support the hypothesis that Acanthamoeba is not a unique cause of amebic keratitis, we report a case of amebic keratitis in which viable Acanthamoeba could not be isolated from corneal tissue. Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella, two other genera of free-living ameba, were isolated, however, using prolonged culture. METHODS: A 24-year-old wearer of soft contact lenses had keratitis. Extensive histologic and microbiologic investigations were performed on corneal scrape, biopsy, and keratoplasty tissue. Contact lenses, storage case, and the home water supply, where contact lens hygiene was practiced, were examined for the presence of micro-organisms. RESULTS: No viruses, pathogenic bacteria, or fungi were detected from corneal tissue samples. Amebae were observed using light and electron microscopy, but these could not be unequivocally classified using immunocytochemical staining. Viable Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella, but no Acanthamoeba, were isolated from the corneal biopsy sample. Indirect immunofluorescence with a range of polyclonal rabbit antisera raised against axenically cultivated stains of the three amebal genera was unhelpful because of cross-reactivity. A diverse range of micro-organisms was present within the storage case, including the three amebal species. Amebic cysts also were associated with the contact lens. CONCLUSION: A mixed non-Acanthamoeba amebic keratitis has been identified in a wearer of soft contact lenses where lack of storage case hygiene provided the opportunity for the free-living protozoa Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella to be introduced to the ocular surface. When Acanthamoeba-like keratitis occurs, but where Acanthamoeba cannot be isolated using conventional laboratory culture methods, alternate means should be used to identify other amebae that may be present. Polyclonal immunofluorescent antibody staining was unreliable for generic identification of pathogenic free-living amebae in corneal tissue.

Advances in rapid laboratory diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis.

Infectious endophthalmitis is a serious ocular condition which always requires rapid medical or surgical intervention. At present this, in a number of situations, remains empirical as a consequence of problems inherent in unequivocal identification of the causative organism, should one be present. Aqueous humor smears and culture have limited value in diagnosis. Vitreous samples can often reveal the presence of microbes, but these may not necessarily be detected in all cases, principally due to suboptimal sampling or pretreatment with antimicrobials which render microbes non-culturable on routine media. Use of electron microscopy and/or immunocytochemistry offers an alternative means of identification, but these approaches have drawbacks principally associated with interpretation. Molecular methods which identify conserved sequences from common causative microbes of endophthalmitis, or which can specify whether the organism is a bacterium or a fungus may become especially important as diagnostic tools in this clinical scenario.