[The Use of Resapolymyxin NP Test in Determining the Sensitivity of Colistin in Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates]. / Escherichia coli ve Klebsiella pneumoniae Izolatlarinda Kolistin Duyarliliginin Belirlenmesinde ResaPolymyxin NP Testinin Kullanimi.

Colistin is used as the last choice of drug in multidrug resistant gram-negative bacilli infections; therefore, accurate detection of colistin susceptibility has gained critical importance. Unfortunately, many of the widely used and practical methods in the clinical laboratory have various limitations for the determination of colistin susceptibility. This situation has led researchers to search for new methods to determine colistin susceptibility. In this study, the performance of the ResaPolymyxin NP test, which was developed for the rapid detection of colistin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, was evaluated for various Gram-negative bacteria for the determination of colistin susceptibility. For this purpose, the colistin MIC values of 105 Escherichia coli, and 196 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were determined by broth microdilution (BMD) using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and then ResaPolymyxin NP test was applied for each isolate. While 242 (%80.4) of the isolates included in the study were found to be susceptible to colistin with BMD, 214 (71.1%) of the isolates were found as sensitive to colistin with the ResaPolymyxin NP test. The categorical agreement rate for the ResaPolymyxin NP test was 85.7% for E.coli isolates, and 92.3% for K.pneumoniae isolates. The major error rate was 14.7% for E.coli, 10.8% for K.pneumoniae, whereas the very major error rate was 1.8% for K.pneumoniae. For ResaPolymyxin NP test, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were %98,3; %88.0; %66.7; and %99.5. In contrast to the available data about the ResaPolymyxin NP test, both the categorical agreement rate with BMD, and the very major and major error rates varied according to the isolate type, and it was concluded that the test performed relatively better in E.coli and K.pneumoniae isolates. Since the data obtained in this study are quite different from the previously published data, more comprehensive and multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the test effectiveness in order to recommend the use of the ResaPolymyxin NP test in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Sensitivity Affected by Disease Severity and Serum Sampling Time: a Performance Evaluation of Six SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays.

Comparative validation and clinical performance data are essential for the reliable interpretation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody test results. This study aimed to assess the performance of six SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays in the context of different disease severities. Four automated chemiluminescence immunoassays (Access [Beckman Coulter], Architect [Abbott], Atellica-IM [Siemens], and Elecsys [Roche]) as well as two ELISA assays (SARS-CoV-2 IgG-S1-based and NCP IgG [Euroimmun]) were evaluated using samples from 143 patients as well as 50 pre-pandemic control serum samples. Accuracy and precision tests were performed for validation purposes. Overall sensitivity ranged between 73.38-88.65% and was higher in spike protein-based assays, while the specificity was ≥98% in all immunoassays. The clinical performance of the immunoassays differed depending on disease severity and target antigen. For instance, the IgG response was lower for samples taken <20 days post-symptom onset (87.30%) compared with those taken ≥20 days post-symptom onset (94.80%). Moreover, moderate disease levels led to the highest levels of IgG. Higher levels of antibodies were detected in the clinically moderate disease group. In asymptomatic and mild groups, more antibody positivity was detected with spike protein-based assays. All the assays tested could be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 IgG. However, spike-based assays revealed relatively higher sensitivity rates than nucleoprotein-based assays, particularly in cases of asymptomatic and mild disease.

A retrospective observational cohort study of the clinical epidemiology of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in an OXA-48 endemic setting.

This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in an OXA-48-predominant environment. This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study including all consecutive patients with CRKP BSIs treated between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Multivariate analysis, subgroup analysis and propensity-score-matched analysis were employed to analyse 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Clinical cure at day 14 was also analysed for the whole cohort. In total, 124 patients with unique isolates met all the inclusion criteria. OXA-48 was the most common type of carbapenemase (85.5%). Inappropriate therapy was significantly associated with 30-day mortality [70.6% vs 39.7%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50-14.40, P=0.008] and 14-day clinical failure (78.5% vs 56.2%, aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.09-9.02, P=0.033) in multivariate analyses. Among those treated appropriately, the 30-day mortality rates were similar in monotherapy and combination therapy arms (OR 2.85, 95% CI 0.68-11.95, P=0.15). INCREMENT CPE mortality score (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33, P=0.029), sepsis at BSI onset (aOR 2.90, 95% CI 1.02-8.27, P=0.046), and inappropriate therapy (aOR 4.65, 95% CI 1.50-14.40, P=0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Colistin resistance in CRKP had no significant impact on 30-day mortality. These results were also confirmed in all propensity-score-matched analyses and sensitivity analyses. Appropriate regimens were associated with better clinical outcomes than inappropriate therapies for BSIs with CRKP predominantly possessing OXA-48.