Why, when, and how should pharmacogenetics be applied in clinical studies?: current and future approaches to study designs.

The growing interest in incorporating pharmacogenetics (PGx) into drug development and clinical practice raises several questions: which study designs best reveal relevant pharmacogenetic biomarkers, best clarify specific hypotheses in PGx, and result in the largest gain of clinical evidence in this field? In this review, we present and compare a variety of PGx-related study designs. The type and quality of evidence gained by each category of study design is evaluated, and an appropriate timeline for the integration of pharmacogenetic studies into drug development is proposed. A summary of the pros and cons of the different study designs might help investigators decide how best to incorporate PGx into drug research. Using different scenarios to explain how genetic polymorphisms influence drug action, we illustrate how this knowledge can be translated into individualized drug choices, individualized dosage determination based on pharmacogenetic diagnostics, and other types of monitoring in order to make drug therapies safer and more effective.

CYP2D6 in the brain: genotype effects on resting brain perfusion.

The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is a genetically polymorphic enzyme involved in the metabolism of several psychoactive drugs. Beside its expression in the liver, CYP2D6 is highly expressed in several regions of the brain, such as the hippocampus, thalamus, hypothalamus and the cortex, but its function in the brain is not well understood. The CYP2D6 enzyme may also have a physiological role due to its involvement in neurotransmitter biotransformation. In this study, CYP2D6 genotyping was performed in N=188 healthy individuals and compared with brain perfusion levels at rest, which may reflect an ongoing biological process regulating the reactivity of the individual to emotional stimuli and the detection of signals evoking fear. Relative to N=42 matched extensive metabolizers, N=14 poor metabolizers were associated with 15% higher perfusion levels in the thalamus (P=0.03 and 0.003). Effects were also present in the whole (N=188) sample divided into metabolizer groups, or finely graded into seven CYP2D6 activity levels. A weaker effect was observed in the right hippocampus (P=0.05). An exploratory analysis, extended to the whole brain, suggested the involvement of CYP2D6 in regions associated with alertness or serotonergic function. These findings support the hypothesis of a functional role of CYP2D6 in the brain.

Genetic variants of the insulin receptor substrate-1 are influencing the therapeutic efficacy of oral antidiabetics.

AIM: The therapeutic efficacy of oral hypoglycaemic drugs varies between individuals, and pharmacogenetic factors contribute to this variability. The Gly972Arg polymorphism in the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) has been shown to play a role in insulin signal transduction and therapeutic failure to sulphonylurea drugs. METHODS: We studied the association between the IRS-1 polymorphism and the haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level in diabetic patients treated with insulinotropic versus non-insulinotropic hypoglycaemic drugs as a marker for the efficacy of an antidiabetic treatment. Genotyping of the IRS-1 Arg(972) variant was performed in type 2 diabetes patients treated with either sulphonylurea drugs, glinides or insulin or with metformin, acarbose or glitazones using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. RESULTS: Significantly higher HbA1c levels were observed in carriers of the Arg(972) variant after treatment with insulinotropic drugs compared to wild-type carriers (8.3 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.005, independent t-test). Furthermore, patients with secondary failure to insulinotropic hypoglycaemic drugs switching finally to insulin showed even higher HbA1c levels in carriers of Arg(972) compared to wild-type (8.7 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.005, independent t-test). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we were able to replicate the earlier findings of an association between the IRS-1 Arg(972) variant and secondary failure to sulphonylurea drugs, and further observed a general association between HbA1c and this polymorphism in type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulinotropic hypoglycaemic drugs but not with metformin.

Assessment of activity levels for CYP2D6*1, CYP2D6*2, and CYP2D6*41 genes by population pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan.

The pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan (DM) is markedly influenced by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme polymorphisms. The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of the CYP2D6*1, *2, and *41 variants on DM metabolism in vivo and to identify other sources of pharmacokinetic variability. Concentrations of DM and dextrorphan (DO) in plasma and urine were evaluated in 36 healthy Caucasian men. These volunteers participated in three clinical studies and received a single oral dose of 30 mg DM-HBr. Data were modeled simultaneously using the population pharmacokinetics NONMEM software. A five-compartment model adequately described the data. The activity levels of the alleles assessed differed significantly. The clearance attributable to an individual CYP2D6*1 copy was 2.5-fold higher as compared with CYP2D6*2 (5,010 vs. 2,020 l/h), whereas the metabolic activity of CYP2D6*41 was very low (85 l/h). Urinary pH was confirmed as a significant covariate for DM renal clearance. These results refine genotype-based predictions of pharmacokinetics for DM and presumably for other CYP2D6 substrates as well.

[Interactions with antiretroviral drugs]. / Arzneimittelinteraktionen mit antiretroviralen Medikamenten.

Drug-drug interactions are frequently encountered in the therapy of HIV-infected patients, since the highly active antiretroviral therapy always contains several drugs. Drugs against opportunistic infections and concomitant diseases are added frequently. All protease inhibitors are inhibitors of CYP3A, which is important in the metabolism of approximately 50% of all drugs, e.g. simvastatin, atorvastatin, sildenafil, and clarithromycin. Among the protease inhibitors, ritonavir is the strongest inhibitor of CYP3A activity. This inhibition is also used to enhance ("boost") the bioavailability of other protease inhibitors. The nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) efavirenz and nevirapine lead to an increase in CYP3A activity during long-term treatment. To prevent interactions, doses of CYP3A substrates have to be adapted in the beginning and at the end of CYP3A activity-modifying treatments. Interactions can also be a result of modifications in the activities of glucuronosyltransferases and of transport proteins. Ritonavir is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, which leads to increased expositions towards many antineoplastic drugs.

A novel presenilin1 mutation (Q223R) associated with early onset Alzheimer's disease, dysarthria and spastic paraparesis and decreased Abeta levels in CSF.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A novel presenilin1 (PSEN1) mutation associated with dementia and spastic paraplegia in a family with five affected individuals is described. The index patient was a 35-year-old man presenting with cognitive decline, behavioural symptoms, dysarthria, and gait disorder due to spasticity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Genetic analysis revealed a missense mutation Gln223Arg in exon 7. Initial CSF analysis revealed drastically decreased Abeta42 level despite marginally decreased FDG metabolism. CONCLUSION: Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker analysis might point towards genetic analysis of PSEN1 in patients with positive family history and age of onset below 60 years.

Relative impact of genotype and enzyme induction on the metabolic capacity of CYP2C9 in healthy volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics in individual subjects is determined by genes and environment. The relative contributions of enzyme induction and inherited genomic variation to cytochrome P450 enzyme 2C9 (CYP2C9) activity are unknown. In 130 volunteers, CYP2C9 activity was measured in vivo using tolbutamide as a probe drug. Tolbutamide was administered orally, and the pharmacokinetics of the drug was analyzed twice--before and after four doses of 450 mg rifampin. Mean total apparent clearances (Cl/F) in the genotype groups CYP2C9*1/*1, *1/*2, *1/*3, *2/*3, and *3/*3 before rifampin were 0.78, 0.74, 0.52, 0.40, and 0.13 l/h, respectively. After rifampin administration, these clearances increased in all genotype groups by a median factor of 1.9 (range 1.1-4.8). The combined effects of genes and environment could be predicted by a simple additive model. Thus, enzyme induction resulted in an approximately twofold difference in CYP2C9 activity, irrespective of the CYP2C9 genotypes. But the difference in activity levels between the CYP2C9*1/*1 and *3/*3 genotypes before the administration of rifampin was sixfold.

[CYP2D6-, CYP2C9- and CYP2C19-based dose adjustments: when do they make sense?]. / CYP2D6-, CYP2C9- und CYP2C19-basierte Arzneimitteldosisanpassungen: Wann sind sie sinnvoll?

The efficacy of a drug therapy is influenced by many different factors such as age, weight, comorbidity and co-medication, which vary between patients, as well as fixed parameters such as gender and pharmacogenetic characteristics. Many enzymes involved in drug metabolism are genetically polymorphic, which means that their activity differs depending on a certain genotype. Drugs will be metabolized slowly in individuals who are carriers of a genetic polymorphism, leading to absent or decreased enzyme activity, and these individuals are at particular risk for adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failure. On the other hand, drug therapy could be ineffective if the drug is metabolized too fast because of a genetic polymorphism. The knowledge of these polymorphisms before beginning a drug therapy could help in choosing the right drug in a safe dosage. In particular, three polymorphic drug metabolizing enzymes are responsible for the metabolism of many commonly used drugs. These enzymes, belonging to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family, are CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Besides beta-blockers and antidepressants, several drugs used in cancer therapy, as well as PPIs, NSAIDs, vitamin K-antagonists and oral antidiabetics are metabolized via these enzymes. Especially for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index and a high risk for the development of adverse drug effects, genotyping could be helpful when choosing the right drug in the optimal dosage for individual patients.

CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolism and morphine/codeine ratios in blood: was it codeine or heroin?

The concentration ratio of morphine (Mor) over codeine (Cod) in opiate positive blood samples is used to discriminate between the use of illegal heroin (high ratios) and therapeutic codeine (low ratios). However, genetically caused CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolism might lead to Mor/Cod comparable to heroin intake. A single oral dose of 30 mg codeine was administered to 11 CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) and 12 extensive metabolizers (EMs). Codeine and its morphine metabolites and Mor/Cod were quantified in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry within 24 h after codeine intake. The Mor/Cod in plasma were below 1 for both UMs and EMs during the first 12 h. After 12 h, 9% of the 11 UM and none of the 12 EM had ratios > 1. In urine, Mor/Cod ratios were below one for all EMs and UMs during the first 12 h. Thus, CYP2D6 genotyping in general will not explain Mor/Cod ratios > 1 in plasma or urine, unless the time of drug intake is more than 24 h previous.

CYP2D6 phenotype prediction from genotype: which system is the best?

Genotyping of the polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 gene is used increasingly in clinical practice. Several psychiatric hospitals already use CYP2D6 testing before treating a patient with antidepressant or antipsychotic drug therapy. In other fields of drug therapy, such as for breast cancer, CYP2D6 status has been reported to be an independent predictor for the outcome with tamoxifen. Thus, a more favorable tamoxifen treatment seems to be feasible through a priori genetic assessment of CYP2D6.

Effect of an antiretroviral regimen containing ritonavir boosted lopinavir on intestinal and hepatic CYP3A, CYP2D6 and P-glycoprotein in HIV-infected patients.

This study aimed to quantify the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A), CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving an antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing ritonavir boosted lopinavir, and to identify factors influencing ritonavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics. We measured activities of CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein in 28 patients before and during ART using a cocktail phenotyping approach. Activities, demographics, and genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein were tested as covariates. Oral midazolam clearance (overall CYP3A activity) decreased to 0.19-fold (90% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.23), hepatic midazolam clearance and intestinal midazolam availability changed to 0.24-fold (0.20-0.29) and 1.12-fold (1.00-1.26), respectively. In CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers, the plasma ratio AUC(dextromethorphan)/AUC(dextrorphan) increased to 2.92-fold (2.31-3.69). Digoxin area under the curve (AUC)(0-12) (P-glycoprotein activity) increased to 1.81-fold (1.56-2.09). Covariates had no major influence on lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics. In conclusion, CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein are profoundly inhibited in patients receiving ritonavir boosted lopinavir. The covariates investigated are not useful for a priori dose selection.

The clinical role of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes.

For most drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), the functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms have been examined. Variants leading to reduced or increased enzymatic activity as compared to the wild-type alleles have been identified. This review tries to define potential fields in the therapy of major medical conditions where genotyping (or phenotyping) of genetically polymorphic DMEs might be beneficial for drug safety or therapeutic outcome. The possible application of genotyping is discussed for depression, cardiovascular diseases and thromboembolic disorders, gastric ulcer, malignant diseases and tuberculosis. Some drugs used for relief of these ailments are metabolized with participation of genetically polymorphic DMEs including CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, thiopurine-S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase and N-acetyltransferase type 2. Current evidence suggests that taking genetically determined metabolic capacities of DMEs into account has the potential to improve individual risk/benefit relationship. However, more prospective studies with clinical endpoints are needed before the paradigm of 'personalized medicine' based on DME variants can be established.

Pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine: enantioselective effects of the CYP2D6 ultra rapid metabolizer genotype and correlation with adverse effects.

Enantiomerically pure drugs and genotyping are promising approaches to achieve optimization in antidepressant therapy. Mirtazapine is a mixed noradrenergic serotoninergic antidepressant used as a racemate. We analyzed pharmacokinetics of its enantiomers in relation to CYP2D6 genotype and in relation to its adverse effects. Mirtazapine was enantioselectively absorbed from the gut with a rate constant of 0.2 min-1 for S+, but 0.08 min-1 for R- mirtazapine. Kinetics of R- mirtazapine was only marginally dependent on CYP2D6 genotype, but total clearance of the S+ enantiomer were 1.3, 2.3, and 3.4 L min-1 in poor, extensive, and ultrarapid metabolizers of CYP2D6 substrates with apparent substantial first-pass metabolism in rapid and ultrarapid metabolizers. Mirtazapine effects on heart rate and blood pressure correlated much more strongly with R- then with S+ concentrations, whereas sedation correlated similarly with both enantiomers. At least concerning some adverse effects, it might be worthwhile to study further mirtazapine enantiospecifically.

Appropriate phenotyping procedures for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in humans and their simultaneous use in the "cocktail" approach.

Phenotyping for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters is used to assess quantitatively the effect of an intervention (e.g., drug therapy, diet) or a condition (e.g., genetic polymorphism, disease) on their activity. Appropriate selection of test drug and metric is essential to obtain results applicable for other substrates of the respective enzyme/transporter. The following phenotyping metrics are recommended based on the level of validation and on practicability: CYP1A2, paraxanthine/caffeine in plasma 6 h after 150 mg caffeine; CYP2C9, tolbutamide plasma concentration 24 h after 125 mg tolbutamide; CYP2C19, urinary excretion of 4'-OH-mephenytoin 0-12 h after 50 mg mephenytoin; CYP2D6, urinary molar ratio debrisoquine/4-OH-debrisoquine 0-8 h after 10 mg debrisoquine; and CYP3A4, plasma clearance of midazolam after 2 mg midazolam (all drugs given orally).

Pharmacokinetics of codeine and its metabolite morphine in ultra-rapid metabolizers due to CYP2D6 duplication.

Codeine is an analgesic drug acting on mu-opiate receptors predominantly via its metabolite morphine, which is formed almost exclusively by the genetically polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Whereas it is known that individuals lacking CYP2D6 activity (poor metabolizers, PM) suffer from poor analgesia from codeine, ultra-fast metabolizers (UM) due to the CYP2D6 gene duplication may experience exaggerated and even potentially dangerous opioidergic effects and no systematical study has been performed so far on this question. A single dose of 30 mg codeine was administered to 12 UM of CYP2D6 substrates carrying a CYP2D6 gene duplication, 11 extensive metabolizers (EM) and three PM. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism methods and a single-base primer extension method for characterization of the gene-duplication alleles. Pharmacokinetics was measured over 24 h after drug intake and codeine and its metabolites in plasma and urine were analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Significant differences between the EM and UM groups were detected in areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUCs) of morphine with a median (range) AUC of 11 (5-17) microg h l(-1) in EMs and 16 (10-24) microg h l(-1) in UM (P=0.02). In urine collected over 12 h, the metabolic ratios of the codeine+codeine-6-glucuronide divided by the sum of morphine+its glucuronides metabolites were 11 (6-17) in EMs and 9 (6-16) in UM (P=0.05). Ten of the 11 CYP2D6 UMs felt sedation (91%) compared to six (50%) of the 12 EMs (P=0.03). CYP2D6 genotypes predicting ultrarapid metabolism resulted in about 50% higher plasma concentrations of morphine and its glucuronides compared with the EM. No severe adverse effects were seen in the UMs in our study most likely because we used for safety reasons a low dose of only 30 mg. It might be good if physicians would know about the CYP2D6 duplication genotype of their patients before administering codeine.

Genetic variation at the CYP2C locus and its association with torsemide biotransformation.

In 97 unselected volunteers and two additional homozygous carriers of CYP2C9(*)3, we investigated the oral clearance of torsemide in relation to 37 polymorphisms at the CYP2C gene locus. Torsemide total oral clearance was linearly associated with the number of CYP2C9(*)3 alleles (geometric mean: 59, 40 and 20 ml/min in carriers of no, one and two alleles) and so were the methyl- and ring-hydroxylation but not the carboxylation clearance. Haplotypes including the CYP2C9(*)3 allele were similarly associated with the clearances but no other variant and no haplotype not including the CYP2C9(*)3 variant. The extended haplotype length (EHL) of the CYP2C9 haplotypes was positively associated with higher activity of the gene product. Torsemide total oral clearance was predictable with r(2)=82.1% using plasma concentrations at 0.5, 1, 2 and 24 h. In conclusion, torsemide's biotransformation strongly depended on the CYP2C9(*)3 variant but no other. Higher clearance CYP2C9 haplotypes appear to be evolutionarily selected.

A 40-basepair VNTR polymorphism in the dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene and the rapid response to antidepressant treatment.

Finding predictors of the response to antidepressant therapy is a major goal of molecular psychiatry. The genes encoding the serotonin (SERT) and dopamine (DAT1) transporters are among the possible candidate genes modulating an individual's antidepressant response. In a naturalistic prospective cohort study with a total of 190 fully assessed patients, improvement of depression symptoms during the 3 weeks following initiation of antidepressant therapy was recorded using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The SLC6A3 3' UTR 40-bp variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) and the SLC6A4 5' 44-bp insertion/deletion polymorphism were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. There was a significantly smaller number of rapid responders among homozygous carriers of the DAT1 9-repeat allele (9/9) than among heterozygous (9/10) and homozygous (10/10) carriers of the 10-repeat allele (19 versus 37 versus 52%, respectively, P=0.0037). Median decline in HDRS score was 35, 40, and 52% in patients with the 9/9, 9/10, and 10/10 genotypes, respectively (P=0.013). The effect was found in all classes of medications (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclics, mirtazapine, venlafaxine) and statistically significant also within the subgroup of patients having received SSRIs. The serotonin promoter insertion/deletion genotype had no effect in the entire study group, but there was an insignificant trend of better response in the l/l and l/s carriers who received SSRIs or mirtazapine. In conclusion, the dopamine transporter VNTR polymorphism influenced rapid response to antidepressant therapy. Compared with homozygous carriers of the 10-repeat allele, carriers of the 9/10 genotype had an odds ratio (OR) calculated by logistic regression analysis of 1.6 (95% CI 0.8-3.2) and carriers of the 9/9 genotype had an OR of 6.0 (1.5-24.4) for no or poor response. Further studies are required to confirm this clinical association and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Genotype and phenotype relationship in drug metabolism.

Pharmacogenetics, one of the fields of clinical pharmacology, studies how genetic factors influence drug response. If hereditary traits are taken into account appropriately before starting drug treatment, the type of drug and its dosage can be tailored to the individual patient's needs. Today, the relationships between dosage requirements and genetic variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 or in drug transporters such as p-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and OATP-C (SLC21A6) are substantiated best. A standard dose will bring about more adverse effects than usual if enzymatic activity is lacking or feeble. Sometimes, however, therapeutic response might be better because of higher concentrations: proton pump inhibitors for eradication of Helicobacter pylori are more efficacious in carriers of a deficient CYP2C19 variant. In some cases, genetic tests can help distinguish between responders and nonresponders of a specific drug treatment, and genotype-based dosage is possible.

[State of the art of pharmacogenetic diagnostics in drug therapy]. / Stand der Pharmakogenetik in der klinischen Arzneimitteltherapie.

Individual differences in the effect and side effect of drugs are partly due to genetic factors (genetic polymorphisms). The responsible polymorphisms lie in genes encoding for drug metabolism and transport but also in direct and indirect drug targets. While genetic variants in pharmacokinetic structures exert effects on drug efficacy via the differences in drug exposure, polymorphisms in drug targets can directly affect clinical efficacy and may lead to a broad variation spectrum between inefficacy and severe side effects. However, at present, our knowledge on genetic variants in drug targets is less detailed than the knowledge on pharmacogenetic variability within drug metabolism. A goal of pharmacogenetic diagnostics implemented in clinical practice is to better predict the individual drug effects on the basis of molecular-genetic profiles. Therapy recommendations can be given as dose adjustments, in particular in the case of polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes which will lead to less variable drug concentrations. At present there are few examples of the application of pharmacogenetic tests in Germany in order to improve and individualize drug therapy. The reasons for this are multifold. On the one hand it is due to the limited awareness of pharmacogenetics; on the other hand it may be due to the lack of fast and economical availability of the appropriate laboratory tests. The most important reason, however, may be that most results of pharmacogenetic research are so far not translated into therapeutically usable conclusions and therapy recommendations. Thus, testing for a genotype without concrete consequences for the drug therapy of an individual patient does not make sense. Pharmacogenetic research, thereby, stands in many cases at the threshold to clinical applicability and in many cases, for instance for the genotyping for thiopurine methyltransferase polymorphisms prior to azathioprine therapy or of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase polymorphisms prior to treatment with 5-fluorouracil, as well as for diagnostics of CYP2D6 before therapy with certain tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics, one would ask already today whether a such drug therapy is still responsible without pharmacogenetic diagnostics.