RESUMO
Faced with the multiple challenges impacting the Belgian healthcare system - notably the aging of the population, the increase in chronic diseases and growing social inequalities in health - the development of a disruptive preventive approach rooted in health promotion is essential to address the population's health problems in a cross-sectional and intersectoral way. However, the scant attention paid to prevention and promotion in the Belgian political landscape (only 3 % of healthcare expenditure), accentuated by the fragmentation of its deployment between the various political-institutional entities (Federal Authority, Communities and Regions), represents a significant limitation. New opportunities, supported in particular by "4P medicine", are paving the way for a modernization of preventive approaches. However, this new way of conceiving prevention will only be beneficial to the community, in all its diversity and complexity, if it re-engages with the fundamentals of health promotion.
Devant les multiples défis auxquels est confronté le système de santé belge - notamment le vieillissement de la population, la progression des maladies chroniques, l'accroissement des inégalités sociales de santé - le développement d'une approche préventive disruptive, qui trouve ses fondements dans la promotion de la santé, est essentiel pour aborder, de façon transversale et intersectorielle, les problèmes de santé de la population. Toutefois, la faible place accordée à la prévention et à la promotion dans le paysage politique belge (seulement 3 % des dépenses de santé), accentuée par un éclatement de son déploiement entre les différentes entités politico-institutionnelles (Autorité fédérale, Communautés et Régions), représente des limites non négligeables. De nouvelles opportunités, notamment soutenues par une «médecine des 4P¼, ouvrent la voie à une modernisation des approches préventives. Toutefois, cette nouvelle façon de concevoir la prévention ne sera profitable à la collectivité, prise dans sa diversité et sa complexité, qu'à la condition de se réancrer dans les fondamentaux inhérents à la promotion de la santé.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Bélgica , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Medicina Preventiva/normasRESUMO
Because of its prevalence and high mortality rate, cancer is a major public health challenge. Radiotherapy is an important treatment option, and makes extensive use of medical imaging. Until now, this type of tool has been reserved to professionals, but it is now opening up to wider use, including by patients themselves for educational purposes. However, this type of usage has been little explored so far. An experimental feasibility study was carried out in the radiotherapy department of the University Hospital of Liège on adult patients with cancer or pulmonary metastases, assigned to two randomized groups. In addition to the usual information given by the radiotherapist, the patients of the experimental group benefited from an intervention consisting in the 3D visualization of their own medical images via the free and open-source computer software «Stone of Orthanc¼. The study results show a low refuse rate (8.2 %) for the 15 patients recruited. Although non-significant, the experimental group showed a median gain in global perception of knowledge, a decrease in anxiety scores and emotional distress. A significant reduction (p = 0.043) was observed for the depression score. The positive results of the feasibility study encourage further work and reinforce the positioning of medical imaging as a tool for therapeutic patient education.
De par sa fréquence et son taux de mortalité élevé, le cancer représente un problème de santé publique majeur. Parmi les traitements possibles, la radiothérapie tient une place importante et fait appel massivement à l'imagerie médicale. Jusqu'ici réservé aux professionnels, ce type d'outil s'ouvre à un usage plus large, y compris par le patient lui-même dans une perspective éducative. Mais cette utilisation est restée peu explorée jusqu'à présent. Une étude expérimentale de faisabilité a ainsi été menée au sein du service de Radiothérapie du CHU de Liège sur des patients adultes avec cancer ou métastases pulmonaires, répartis en deux groupes randomisés. En plus des informations habituellement données par le radiothérapeute, le groupe expérimental a bénéficié d'une intervention consistant en la visualisation en 3D de ses propres images médicales via le logiciel libre et open-source «Stone of Orthanc¼. Les résultats de l'étude indiquent un taux de refus faible (8,2 %) pour les 15 patients recrutés. Bien que non significatif, le groupe expérimental a montré, par rapport au groupe contrôle, un gain médian dans la perception globale de connaissances ainsi qu'une diminution des scores liés à l'anxiété et à la détresse émotionnelle. Une réduction significative (p = 0,043) est observée pour le score de dépression. Les résultats positifs de l'étude de faisabilité encouragent la poursuite des travaux et renforcent le positionnement de l'usage de l'imagerie médicale en tant qu'outil d'éducation thérapeutique du patient.
Assuntos
Estudos de Viabilidade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Radioterapia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization established a number of key recommendations such as educational activities especially within primary care practices (PCPs) which are a key component of this strategy. This paper aims to examine the educational activities of PCPs during COVID-19 pandemic and to identify the factors associated with these practices across 38 countries. METHODS: A "Patient Education (PE)" score was created based on responses to six items from the self-reported questionnaire among PCPs (n = 3638) compiled by the PRICOV-19 study. Statistical analyses were performed on 3638 cases, with PCPs with missing PE score values were excluded. RESULTS: The PE score features a mean of 2.55 (SD = 0.68) and a median of 2.50 (2.16 - 3.00), with a maximum of 4.00, and varies quite widely between countries. Among all PCPs characteristics, these factors significantly increase the PE score: the payment system type (with a capitation payment system or another system compared to the fee for service), the perception of average PCP with patients with chronic conditions and the perception of adequate governmental support. CONCLUSION: The model presented in this article is still incomplete and requires further investigation to identify other configuration elements favorable to educational activities. However, the results already highlight certain levers that will enable the development of this educational approach appropriate to primary care.