I get tired for no reason: a single item screening for cancer-related fatigue.

This study examined the criterion validity and sensitivity and specificity of a single item to rapidly screen patients in ambulatory oncology clinics for cancer-related fatigue. In an effort to expand the utility of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) as a screen for other symptoms, the utility of the single fatigue item was examined. The fatigue item reads "I get tired for no reason" and is rated on a four-point scale ranging from "none or a little of the time" to "most or all of the time." Fifty-two subjects were administered the Zung, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) scale, and the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI). The Zung item was highly correlated with the ZSDS (r= 0.63, p < 0.0001) and the FACT-An (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001), as well as to the individual items of the FSI, ranging from 0.41 (p < 0.003) to 0.71 (p < 0.0001). All 10 subjects considered to be depressed based on the ZSDS were also considered to fatigued on the FACT-An. Setting the ZSDS item cutoff point at level 3--"A good part of the time"--yielded a sensitivity of 78.95% and a specificity of 87.88%. It is concluded that a single item can be a fast and accurate way of screening cancer patients for fatigue to trigger additional follow-up, thus expanding the utility of a depression screening tool for problems other than the purely psychiatric.

An attempt to employ the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a "lab test" to trigger follow-up in ambulatory oncology clinics: criterion validity and detection.

We examined issues of criterion validity and detection of depression employing the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) as a "lab test" to trigger follow-up interviews of ambulatory oncology patients by oncology staff and the possibility of subsequent algorithm-based antidepressant treatment. Sixty oncology patients were screened with the ZSDS and then interviewed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). We examined the sensitivity and specificity of various cutoffs on the ZSDS and a briefer version, the Brief Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (BZSDS) as they predicted results of the MINI, which was used as the criterion. Mean age of patients was 58.3 years (SD = 11.9). Thirty-two were female (53.3%) and 28 were male (46.7%). The correlation of the ZSDS (r = -0.66, P <.0001) and BZSDS (r = -0.57, P <.0001) with the MINI overall suggested acceptable levels of criterion validity. Additionally, we examined various cutoff scores on the ZSDS and BZSDS to explore the false negative and false positive rates that are associated with each. For example, using the mild cutoff on the Zung (score > 48) to determine depression or adjustment disorder, 14 false negatives and 2 false positives were found. When the more stringent moderate cutoff (score > 56) was used, 25 false negatives and 0 false positives were found. Oncology staff can utilize such data to make decisions about where to set cut-offs that trigger follow-up based on the amount of error that is allowable in their attempts to identify depressive symptoms in their patients. We discuss that such decisions might be based on many factors including the resources available in a particular site for follow-up or the comfort of particular oncologists and nurses managing and prescribing psychotropic medications, or in providing supportive counseling.

The changeable nature of patients' fears regarding chemotherapy: implications for palliative care.

The side effects of chemotherapy are feared by cancer patients as they begin their treatment. In this study, we investigated patients' anticipatory fears about chemotherapy. We then re-assessed these fears three to six months after the initial interview for patients who received chemotherapy during that time. We also examined symptom distress at these intervals. Hair loss, vomiting, infection, nausea, and weight loss were ranked as the most feared side effects of cancer treatment for the group as they began treatment. Patients beginning chemotherapy endorsed frequent or intense levels of fatigue, worrying about the future, pain, and sleep problems. No differences were found in the reporting of symptoms based on gender, age, or educational level. While changes in symptom distress over the study period were unremarkable, changes in fears about chemotherapy were of interest. The most feared symptoms were re-ordered following the treatment experience. The endorsement of nausea and vomiting, alopecia, and loss of appetite decreased significantly. Thirty-five percent fewer chemotherapy patients reported vomiting as one of their most feared side effects; 45% fewer patients who received anti-emetics reported vomiting as one of their most feared side effects. Effective treatments, such as those that have been developed to treat acute chemotherapy-related emesis, can relieve the fears of patients on treatment. We conclude that patients' fears about treatment are fluid and malleable. Patients' fears of suffering related to chemotherapy treatment change in response to the provision of adequate management. We discuss the implications of these findings for palliative care education.

The importance of quality-of-life endpoints in clinical trials to the practicing oncologist.

Quality-of-life research has helped describe and draw attention to the human side of cancer treatment. The field has made tremendous advances and has influenced the treatment of cancer. The practicing oncologist can benefit greatly by keeping abreast of developments in this field and applying them to the selection of treatment modalities based on both treatment efficacy and the patient's wishes. In the future, quality-of-life research will probably continue to be integrated into the practice of oncology.

A pilot survey of aberrant drug-taking attitudes and behaviors in samples of cancer and AIDS patients.

The clinical assessment of drug-taking behaviors in medically ill patients with pain is complex and may be hindered by the lack of empirically derived information about such behaviors in particularly medically ill populations. To investigate issues surrounding the assessment of these behaviors, we piloted a questionnaire based on the observations of specialists in pain management and substance abuse. This preliminary questionnaire evaluated medication use, present and past drug abuse, patients' beliefs about the risk of addiction in the context of pain treatment, and aberrant drug-taking attitudes and behaviors. This instrument was piloted in a mixed group of cancer patients (N = 52) and a group of women with HIV/AIDS (N = 111). Reports of past drug use and abuse were more frequent than present reports in both groups. Current aberrant drug-related behaviors were seldom reported, but attitude items revealed that patients would consider engaging in aberrant behaviors, or would possibly excuse them in others, if pain or symptom management were inadequate. Aberrant behaviors and attitudes were endorsed more frequently by the women with HIV/AIDS than by the cancer patients. Patients greatly overestimated the risk of addiction in pain treatment. We discuss the significance of these findings and the need for cautious interpretation given the limitations of the methodology. This early experience suggests that both cancer and HIV/AIDS patients appear to respond in a forthcoming fashion to drug-taking behavior questions and describe attitudes and behaviors that may be highly relevant to the diagnosis and understanding management of substance use among patients with medical illness.

Factor analysis of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in a large ambulatory oncology sample.

Screening cancer patients for depression with self-report inventories presents clinical and methodological challenges. Many investigators separate "somatic" from "cognitive" symptoms when adapting such measures to oncology settings. However, this practice has rarely been empirically validated through factor-analytic studies. The following study describes a factor analysis of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) from a large ambulatory sample of cancer patients (N = 1,109). A four-factor solution emerged, consisting of a cognitive symptom factor, a manifest depressed mood factor, and two somatic factors (eating and non-eating related). These factors accounted for 20% (cognitive), 13% (mood), 8% (non-eating), and 7% (eating) of the variance on the Zung, respectively. The authors discuss the implications of these results as they pertain to screening cancer patients for depression.

A chart review of the ordering and documentation of urine toxicology screens in a cancer center: do they influence patient management?

Urine toxicology screens (UTSs) may be useful in the diagnosis or monitoring of patients with established or suspected substance abuse. In the medically ill, including those with cancer, the test may help clinicians manage therapy with controlled prescription drugs. To describe the current use of UTSs in a cancer center, the medical records of 111 patients who underwent UTS were reviewed. These 111 patients were randomly selected from a group of 215 patients who underwent screening between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1994 (a period during which over 80,000 admissions occurred). Fifty-six of the 111 patients had evidence of one or more illicit drugs, a prescription medication that had not been ordered, or alcohol; 50 patients had negative screens. The likelihood of a positive UTS was higher if the patient had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (100% versus 46.6%) or was undergoing treatment for chronic nonmalignant pain (100% versus 43.9%). Documentation of the UTS in the medical record was infrequent: 37.8% of the charts listed no reason for obtaining the test and the ordering physician could not be identified in 29% of the records. Eighty-nine percent of the records did not contain a subsequent mention of the result of the UTS. The result was more likely to lead to a documented outcome when it was positive rather than negative (14.3% versus 0%). These results suggest that UTSs are used infrequently in the tertiary care oncology center. The documentation surrounding the ordering and subsequent use of the test in patient management is unsystematic. The appropriate use and documentation of UTSs, like substance abuse issues in general, should be a focus of staff education and quality improvement efforts.