Interprofessional Image Verification Workshop for Physician and Physics Residents: A Multi-Institutional Experience.

PURPOSE: Verification of patient position through pretreatment setup imaging is crucial in modern radiation therapy. As treatment complexity increases and technology evolves, physicist-physician collaboration becomes imperative for safe and successful radiation delivery. Despite the importance of both, residency programs lack formal interprofessional education (IPE) activities or structured training for image verification. Here we show the impact of an interprofessional image verification workshop for residents in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: The workshop included a lecture by the attending physicist and physician, and hands-on image registration practice by learners (medical physics residents, MP; and radiation oncology residents, RO). All participants filled out pre- and postactivity surveys and rated their comfort from 1 to 10 in (A) selecting what type of imaging to order for a given case and (B) independently assessing the setup quality based on imaging. A paired 1-tailed t test (α = 0.05) was used to evaluate significance; Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation of ratings and RO postgraduate year (PGY). Surveys had free-response questions about IPE and image verification activities in residency. RESULTS: A total of 71 residents from 7 institutions participated between 2018 and 2020. Pre- and postsurveys were completed by 50 residents (38RO, 12MP) and showed an increase in (A) from 5.5 ± 2.2 to 7.1 ± 1.6 (P < .001) and in (B) from 5.1 ± 2.3 to 6.8 ± 1.5 (P < .001), with significant increases per subgroup (AΔ, RO = 1.8 ± 1.7, P < .001; BΔ, RO = 1.9 ± 1.8, P <. 001; AΔ, MP = 1.1 ± 1.4, P = .012; BΔ, MP = 1.2 ± 1.6, P = .016). RO confidence scores moderately correlated with PGY. Survey responses indicated that image verification training is mostly unstructured, with extent of exposure varying by program and attending; most with little-to-no training. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier. IPE was noted as a useful way to incorporate different perspectives into the process. CONCLUSIONS: Formal image verification training increases resident comfort with setup imaging review and provides opportunities for interprofessional collaboration in radiation oncology residency programs.

Commissioning of a Versa HDTM linear accelerator for three commercial treatment planning systems.

In a mixed-vendor radiation oncology environment, it is advantageous if the department's treatment planning system (TPS) supports the linear accelerators of different vendors. In this publication beam data collection and modeling for the Versa HD linear accelerator in Monaco, Pinnacle, and Eclipse are discussed. In each TPS static field, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) step and shoot, and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for flattened and flattening-filter free photon beams of all available energies were evaluated for field sizes >3 × 3. To compare passing rates, identical beam model validation plans were calculated in each TPS. Eclipse, Monaco, and Pinnacle beam models passed validation measurements in homogeneous materials for a variety of treatment fields, including static, IMRT, and VMAT. In the case of Eclipse, the "dosimetric leaf gap" parameter was found to be critical for passing rates of VMAT plans. The source size parameter plays an important role as well for small fields. In the case of Pinnacle the multileaf collimator offset table needed to be optimized for better VMAT QA results. Each of the investigated treatment planning systems met the criteria to be used clinically in conjunction with Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators. It can be of great advantage to have the option to operate a TPS and linear accelerator from different vendors, as decisions surrounding linear accelerator or TPS purchases are very complicated and not just limited to technical considerations.

The impact of anatomic tumor location on inter-fraction tumor motion during lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

PURPOSE: Narrow PTV margins and steep dose gradients underscore the importance of evaluating breathing-associated tumor motion for lung SBRT. The specific aim of this study was to determine the impact of anatomic tumor location on inter-fraction tumor motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-one patients underwent standard free-breathing 4DCT simulation and daily image-guidance 4DCTs during lung SBRT. Absolute tumor motion amplitude in the mediolateral (ML), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions was analyzed from 159 total 4DCT scans (simulation and daily pre-treatment). RESULTS: Overall, the inter-fraction tumor motion amplitude in the ML, AP, and SI directions was small (mean ≤2.5 mm). Similarly, while both upper lobe (UL) and lower lobe (LL) tumors exhibited limited inter-fraction motion in both the ML and AP directions (mean ≤2.2 mm), tumors in the LL had increased inter-fraction motion in the SI direction compared to UL tumors (mean 4.3±4.0 mm vs. 1.7±1.7 mm, p=0.008). Moreover, 28.6% (n=4) of LL tumors exhibited mean inter-fraction motion along the SI direction >5 mm (all of which resided in the supra-diaphragmatic basal segments of the LL). CONCLUSIONS: Mean inter-fraction tumor motion amplitude along the SI direction exceeded our PTV margins (an isotropic 5 mm expansion of the ITV) in 28.6% of LL tumors (all of which resided in the basal segments). These results suggest that typical ITV-to-PTV margins may be insufficient for a subset of LL lesions and that increased PTV margins, daily breathing motion re-assessment and/or adaptive re-planning may benefit patients with supra-diaphragmatic tumors in the LL.