A new psychometric questionnaire for reporting of somatosensory percepts.

OBJECTIVE: There have been remarkable advances over the past decade in neural prostheses to restore lost motor function. However, restoration of somatosensory feedback, which is essential for fine motor control and user acceptance, has lagged behind. With an increasing interest in using electrical stimulation to restore somatosensory sensations within the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems (CNS), it is critical to characterize the percepts evoked by electrical stimulation in a standardized manner with a validated psychometric questionnaire. This will allow comparison of results from applications at various nervous system levels in multiple settings. APPROACH: We compiled a summary of published reports of somatosensory percepts that were elicited by electrical stimulation in humans and used these to develop a new psychometric questionnaire. RESULTS: This new questionnaire was able to characterize subjective evoked sensations with good test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation coefficients ranging 0.716 ⩽ ρ ⩽ 1.000, p ⩽ 0.005) in 13 subjects receiving stimulation through neural implants in both the CNS and PNS. Furthermore, the new questionnaire captured more descriptors (M = 2.65, SD = 0.91) that would have been missed by being categorized as 'other sensations', using a previous questionnaire (M = 1.40, SD = 0.77, t(12) = -10.24, p < 0.001). Lastly, the new questionnaire was able to capture different descriptors within subjects using different patterns of electrical stimulation (Wilk's Lambda = 0.42, F(3, 10) = 4.58, p = 0.029). SIGNIFICANCE: This new somatosensory psychometric questionnaire will aid in establishing consistency and standardization of reporting in future studies of somatosensory neural prostheses.

Surgery for Parkinson's disease improves disability but not impairment components of the UPDRS-II.

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) activities of daily living (ADL) items have been described as reflecting both disability (true ADL items) and impairment (rather than ADLs). As a result of combining these scores, UPDRS part II scores may not accurately reflect the impact of surgery on ADLs [Hariz G.M., Lindberg M., Hariz M.I., Bergenheim A.T. Does the ADL part of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale measure ADL? An evaluation in patients after pallidotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 2003;18:373-81.]. The goal of the present study was to assess the metric properties of the ADL section of the UPDRS in terms of its ability to measure surgical change. We tested the effects of unilateral pallidotomy (N=14) and bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS (N=11) on both disability and impairment components of the UPDRS-II at uniform follow-up assessment periods of 6 months and 1 year, with a subset of pallidotomy patients (N=9) re-assessed at 2 years. Across the follow-up periods in both patient groups, items identified as best reflecting disability showed significant improvement from pre-surgical levels, whereas items representing impairment showed no overall change. Consistent with this, change in total ADL scores was tempered by the inclusion of the impairment items. Because the measurement of a patient's functional status is important in determining the effectiveness of an intervention, analysis of appropriate items from the UPDRS ADL section is imperative.

Referrals for movement disorder surgery: under-representation of females and reasons for refusal.

OBJECTIVE: Referral of movement disorder patients for deep brain stimulation surgery was examined to determine whether referred patients were representative of gender proportions in our population, and reasons why patients do not proceed to surgery. METHODS: Demographic information on referrals to the surgical program was retrospectively reviewed from our database and from a detailed chart review. RESULTS: Although almost equal numbers of movement disorder patients are male and female, of the 91 patients referred for surgery, only 31% were female. Sixty-one percent of referred patients did not undergo surgery. Of these, the majority were denied for medical reasons, including cognitive decline (21%), psychiatric concerns (5%) and neurological reasons (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-third of patients referred for movement disorder surgery were denied for medical reasons. This underscores the importance of evaluation of all potential patients by a multidisiplinary team to fully assess suitablity for stereotactic surgery. Interestingly, women were under-represented in those referred. In order that all appropriate patients have the opportunity to consider surgery, education of both physicians and patients, and different strategies to approach females regarding surgery may allow more patients to benefit from this treatment.

Kinaesthetic neurons in thalamus of humans with and without tremor.

Increased afferent input may alter receptive field sizes, properties and somatotopographic representation in the cortex. Changes in the motor thalamus may also occur as a result of altered afferent input. Such plasticity has been implicated in both sensory and movement disorders. Using tremor as a model of augmented afferent input to kinaesthetic/deep neurons representing the shaking limbs, we studied the representation and properties of these neurons in human thalamus in patients with resting tremor (RestTr) from Parkinson's disease, patients with action- or posture-induced tremor (ActionTr), and patients without tremor (NoTr). Data were collected during stereotactic thalamotomy or insertion of deep brain stimulators for relief of pain or movement disorder. Using microelectrode recording, 58 kinaesthetic neurons responding to wrist and/or elbow movement were studied by mapping the receptive field, carefully isolating each joint during testing. There were no significant differences in the proportions of single and multijoint responsive neurons in the different patient groups (RestTr, ActionTr and NoTr). The borders between tactile-cutaneous, deep-kinaesthetic and voluntary cell representations in the thalamus were mapped in 74 patients and compared between the different tremor groups. A significant difference in kinaesthetic representation was found: both the RestTr and ActionTr groups had a significantly greater kinaesthetic representation than the NoTr patients. There was an expansion of kinaesthetic representation in patients with chronic increased afferent drive from tremor, without alteration in RF size. No decrease in tactile representation was found, suggesting that the increase in kinaesthetic representation does not occur at the expense of tactile representation. These data suggest that plasticity can occur at the thalamic level in humans and may contribute to the pathogenesis of tremor.

Neuronal response to local electrical stimulation in rat thalamus: physiological implications for mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of sensorimotor thalamus containing "tremor cells" leads to tremor arrest in humans with parkinsonian and essential tremor. To examine the possible underlying mechanism(s), we recorded in vitro intracellular responses of rat thalamic neurons to local intrathalamic stimulation. Such simulated DBS (sDBS) induced a sustained membrane depolarization accompanied by an increase in apparent membrane conductance in both motor and sensory neurons. With stimulation frequency above approximately 100 Hz, the sDBS-induced depolarization most typically led to repetitive neuronal firing or less frequently resulted in a complete blockade of action potential genesis. When regular intracellular current pulses were injected into cells to mimic "tremor" activity, such rhythmic discharges were invariably disrupted or abolished by the random spike firing induced during high-frequency sDBS. Low-frequency sDBS left rhythmicity unaffected.We conclude that clinical thalamic DBS may lead to a neuronal de-rhythmicity and tremor stoppage through masking and/or blocking rhythmic firing of tremor cells.