Residual Monomer Release after the Polymerization of Different-Colored Flowable Compomer.

BACKGROUND: Compomers are restorative materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry. It is important to investigate the monomer release of materials used especially in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the residual monomer released from different-colored flowable compomers at five polymerization times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experimental groups were formed: Group 1: pink flowable compomer (Twinky Star, VOCO, Germany), Group 2: blue flowable compomer (Twinky Star, VOCO), Group 3: white flowable compomer, A2 color of Dyract XP (Dentslpy DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). For each group, samples were prepared using standard cylindrical Teflon molds (n = 10), and the compomers were cured using a light-emitting diode (LED) source in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. During each time period, the number of residual monomers: bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). All data were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In all groups, the amount of residual monomers increased after 1-h release periods (P < 0.05). For 2 weeks, the total residual monomers released were determined at most in Group 3 and at least in Group 1. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of released amounts of monomers (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to the study, when the total amount of residual monomer released from all groups was compared, no difference was found and it was observed that none of them exceeded the toxic dose. Flowable colored compomers can be used as safely as white compomers in pediatric dentistry.

Survival of avulsed permanent incisors in children following delayed replantation.

BACKGROUND: Replantation of avulsed teeth is an invasive treatment approach where patient cooperation is required after the risks are explained to the patient or family. Although replantation of an avulsed permanent teeth is an accepted treatment approach, the long-term prognosis of the replanted teeth is still controversial. This report describes the survival of delayed replanted 15 incisors that was stored in unfavorable conditions after avulsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients, aged 8-12 years, were referred to the Inonu University, Pediatric Dentistry Department with traumatically avulsed incisors. The parents were informed about the possible complications of a delayed replantation. RESULTS: Forty percent of the teeth were splinted with flexible orthodontic wire and composite. The follow-up periods were varied from 24 to 48 months. The mean follow-up periods were 33.3 ± 8 months. 40% of the teeth were retained in the mouth for at least 3 years and contributed to alveolar bone development. In these cases, the most common complication (9 teeth, 60%) was replacement root resorption. Two of the 15 teeth which had wide open apices, continued to the root development. CONCLUSION: In this study, replanted teeth were retained in the mouth for at least 2 years and contributed to the patient's development. Therefore, this study has shown that delayed replantation of an avulsed tooth for a child is still worthwhile, even in cases of poor prognosis where the tooth had extended extra-alveolar dry storage. We believe that delayed replantation should be done because of its importance for the child's jaw and facial development.