Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 41(2): 187-91, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21491155

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To measure the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of post total hip arthroplasty (THA) leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement on radiographs as well as to evaluate its accuracy by comparing it with LLD measurement on computed tomographic scanogram (CT-scanogram). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, postoperative LLD measurements in ten THA patients were made by four observers on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis (inter-teardrop line to the tip of lesser trochanter) and compared to LLD measurements made on CT-scanogram scout views of the lower limb. Two observers repeated the LLD measurements on radiographs 8 weeks after the first measurements. The interobserver reliability of the LLD measurement on plain radiographs was evaluated by comparing the measurements of the four observers and the intraobserver reproducibility by comparing the two repeated measurements made by the two observers. RESULTS: We found excellent interobserver reliability (mean ICC 0.83) and intraobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.90 and 0.88) of the LLD measurements on plain radiographs. There was a moderate to excellent agreement, but with wide variation of measurements among the four observers, when plain radiographic measurement was compared with CT-scanogram (ICC 0.58, 0.60, 0.71, and 0.82). CONCLUSION: Despite the excellent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of LLD measurement on radiographs, clinicians should be aware of its limited accuracy when compared to CT-scanogram.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores/diagnóstico por imagem , Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Filme para Raios X , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Hip Int ; 19(4): 377-81, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20041386

RESUMO

Restoring femoral offset (FO) is an important factor for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, earlier methods of measuring FO do not take in consideration the positioning of the acetabular component. In this study we introduce and evaluate a new radiological method of measuring FO as the horizontal distance between the femoral axis and the midline of the pelvis, at the height of the lateral tip of the greater trochanter.Ten patients operated with THA underwent a plain radiographic examination of the pelvis (AP view) and a CT scanogram for the pelvis and lower limbs (scout view). The radiological FO measurement using the new method was initially compared to FO measurement on CT scanogram and subsequently to the traditional radiological method of measuring FO. We tested the interobserver reliability and the intraobserver reproducibility of the new method.We found an excellent agreement between the new radiological method and the CT measurement and between the new radiological method and the traditional radiological method. We also found an excellent interobserver reliability and an intraobserver reproducibility of the new method. We believe the new method is easier than and as reliable as previously described methods.


Assuntos
Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Acetábulo/anatomia & histologia , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Articulação do Quadril/anatomia & histologia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Pelve/anatomia & histologia , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...