Metabolic and Growth Outcome of Two-year Growth Hormone Treatment in Children Born Small for Gestational Age: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Children born Small for Gestational Age (SGA) without early catch-up growth may show impaired growth rate, adult height, and metabolic profile [1]. Growth Hormone (GH) is recommended for their treatment, and it has been shown to have positive effects on growth and metabolic profile and good tolerability [2]. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the auxological and metabolic effects and safety of GH treatment in SGA children. METHODS: 34 SGA children (15 F, 19 M; mean age: 8.72 ± 2.48 yrs) treated with GH (starting dosage: 32.24 ± 2.88 mcg/kg/die) were evaluated every six months for 24 months with growth and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: After two years, SGA children showed a significant improvement in height, weight, and growth rate, already evident after six months (p < 0.001), with a constant, significant improvement in height throughout the treatment (p ≤ 0.03 T0 vs. T12, T12 vs. T24). Conversely, although significantly higher than baseline at each visit (p < 0.001), the growth rate significantly decreased from 6 to 18 months (p ≤ 0.015 T6 vs. T12, T12 vs. T18). During the follow-up, an increase in glycemia (p ≤ 0.042 vs. T12, T18) and urycemia (p ≤ 0.01 vs. T12, T18, and T24) and a decrease in AST (p ≤ 0.021 vs. T12, T18, and T24) and LDL cholesterol (p = 0.03 vs. T24) were observed. Overall, treatment was found to be well tolerated, with poor compliance being the most frequent adverse event (11.8%) and no reported hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, GH can be considered an effective, safe treatment in SGA children, improving height and growth rate, although proper metabolic follow-up is required.

Auxological and metabolic effects of long-term treatment with recombinant growth hormone in children born small for gestational age: a retrospective study.

RATIONALE: Children born small for gestational age (SGA) not showing catch-up during the first two years of life reportedly show an impaired growth rate and adult height, as well as a worse metabolic outcome, mainly in terms of glycemic and lipid profile, compared to general population. In SGA children with short stature, treatment with recombinant growth hormone (GH) is currently recommended until adolescence; therefore, it may last long-term. STUDY METHODS: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the auxological and metabolic effects and the safety of long-term recombinant GH treatment in SGA children. The study included 15 SGA children (5 F, 10 M; mean age: 6.78 yrs) treated with GH for at least 48 months. Growth and metabolic parameters, including glycemic and lipid profile, transaminases, and urycemia, were collected every six months. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, SGA children showed a significant improvement in height, weight, and growth rate after four yaers of treatment with GH (p ≤ 0.002), being already evident after six months of treatment (p < 0.001). Noteworthy, patients showed a constant, significant improvement in height throughout the treatment, as it was significantly higher at each follow-up compared to the previous one, until 42 months of treatment, except at 30 months of treatment (p < 0.001 T6VST12; p < 0.01 T12VST18, T18VST24; p < 0.05 T30VST36, T36VST42). Considering metabolic parameters, compared to baseline, a recurring increase in glycemia (p ≤ 0.028 vs T30, T36, and T48) and decrease in AST (p ≤ 0.035 vs T36, T42, and T48) and an occasional decrease in LDL cholesterol (p ≤ 0.04 vs T24 and T42) and triglycerides (p = 0.008 vs T18) and increase in urycemia (p = 0.034 vs T42). Considering safety profile, treatment was well tolerated, as the most frequently reported adverse event was poor compliance (20%); no hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia or hyperstransaminasemia occurred throughout the treatment, CONCLUSIONS: Long-term GH treatment showed to be effective in improving height and growth rate in SGA children, with a positive impact of metabolic profile and a safety profile, although glycemia should be carefully monitored over time.

De Novo Large Deletions in the PHEX Gene Caused X-Linked Hypophosphataemic Rickets in Two Italian Female Infants Successfully Treated with Burosumab.

Pathogenic variants in the PHEX gene cause rare and severe X-linked dominant hypophosphataemia (XLH), a form of heritable hypophosphatemic rickets (HR) characterized by renal phosphate wasting and elevated fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels. Burosumab, the approved human monoclonal anti-FGF23 antibody, is the treatment of choice for XLH. The genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of HR often delays XLH diagnoses, with critical effects on disease course and therapy. We herein report the clinical and genetic features of two Italian female infants with sporadic HR who successfully responded to burosumab. Their diagnoses were based on clinical and laboratory findings and physical examinations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the genes associated with inherited HR and multiple ligation probe amplification (MLPA) analysis of the PHEX and FGF23 genes were performed. While a conventional analysis of the NGS data did not reveal pathogenic or likely pathogenic small nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the known HR-related genes, a quantitative analysis identified two different heterozygous de novo large intragenic deletions in PHEX, and this was confirmed by MLPA. Our molecular data indicated that deletions in the PHEX gene can be the cause of a significant fraction of XLH; hence, their presence should be evaluated in SNV-negative female patients. Our patients successfully responded to burosumab, demonstrating the efficacy of this drug in the treatment of XLH. In conclusion, the execution of a phenotype-oriented genetic test, guided by known types of variants, including the rarest ones, was crucial to reach the definitive diagnoses and ensure our patients of long-term therapy administration.

Growth alterations in rare forms of primary adrenal insufficiency: a neglected issue in paediatric endocrinology.

Primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) is an endocrine disorder characterized by direct adrenal failure, with consequent glucocorticoid, and eventually mineralocorticoid, deficiency. In children, the main cause of PAI is congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), due to a loss of function of adrenal steroidogenic enzymes, but also rarer forms, including autoimmune polyglandular syndrome, adrenoleucodistrophy, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, familial glucocorticoid deficiency, and Allgrove's Syndrome, may be observed. In PAI children, growth alterations represent a major issue, as both inadequate and excessive glucocorticoid replacement treatment may lead to reduced growth rate and adult height impairment. However, growth abnormalities are poorly studied in rare forms of paediatric PAI, and specific studies on growth rate in these children are currently lacking. In the present review, the currently available evidence on growth alterations in children with rare PAI forms will be summarized, with a major focus on comorbidities with a potential impact on patients' growth rate.

Summary of Expert Opinion on the Management of Children With Chronic Kidney Disease and Growth Failure With Human Growth Hormone.

Background: The management of children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and growth failure candidate for recombinant human growth hormone therapy (rhGH) is based on an appraisal of the literature established on a 2006 consensus statement and 2019 Clinical practice recommendations. The performance of these guidelines has never been tested. Aims: The objective of this study was to establish the level of adherence to international guidelines based on the 2006 consensus and the 2019 criteria that lead to the initiation of growth hormone treatment by both pediatric endocrinologists and pediatric nephrologists. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of pediatric endocrinologists and pediatric nephrologists, members of the Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology or of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology, discussed and reviewed the main issues related to the management of pediatric patients with CKD who need treatment with rhGH. Experts developed 11 questions focusing on risk assessment and decision makings in October 2019 and a survey was sent to forty pediatric endocrinologists (n = 20) and nephrologists (n = 20) covering the whole national territory. The results were then analyzed and discussed in light of current clinical practice guidelines and recent recommendations. Results: Responses were received from 32 of the 40 invited specialists, 17 of whom were pediatric endocrinologists (42.5%) and 15 pediatric nephrologists (37.5%). Although all the centers that participated in the survey agreed to follow the clinical and biochemical diagnostic work-up and the criteria for the treatment of patients with CKD, among the Italian centers there was a wide variety of decision-making processes. Conclusions: Despite current guidelines for the management of children with CKD and growth failure, its use varies widely between centers and rhGH is prescribed in a relatively small number of patients and rarely after kidney transplantation. Several raised issues are not taken into account by international guidelines and a multidisciplinary approach with mutual collaboration between specialists will improve patient care based on their unmet needs.

Common carotid intima-media thickness in growth hormone (GH)-deficient adolescents: a prospective study after GH withdrawal and restarting GH replacement.

We prospectively investigated the risk of early atherosclerosis, by classical cardiovascular risk factors and intima-media thickness (IMT) at the common carotid arteries, in 23 adolescents diagnosed as GH deficient (GHD) during childhood and in 23 healthy sex-, age-, and BMI-matched controls. Measurements were performed in all subjects before stopping GH replacement. Because the diagnosis of GHD had been confirmed in 15 of the 23 adolescents, the protocol changed according to the diagnosis as follows: measurements were repeated after 6 months of GH withdrawal and 6 months of GH reinstitution in the 15 with GHD, and after 6 and 12 months of GH withdrawal, measurements were also taken in the eight non-GHD subjects. Serum IGF-I levels were in the normal range for age in all patients before GH withdrawal. When compared with controls, before GH withdrawal, GHD adolescents had reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and increased total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, fibrinogen, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose levels; non-GHD adolescents had increased glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment score. IMT at the common carotid arteries was similar in GHD and controls (0.52 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.06 mm; P = 0.23) and was higher in non-GHD than in controls (0.62 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.06 mm; P = 0.01). In GHD adolescents, 6 months of GH treatment withdrawal and 6 months of GH treatment reinstitution modified IGF-I levels, lipid profile, and insulin resistance but not IMT or systolic and diastolic peak velocities at the common carotid arteries. In non-GHD subjects, 12 months of GH treatment withdrawal significantly decreased IGF-I levels, IMT (to 0.54 +/- 0.06 mm; P < 0.001 vs. baseline), systolic and diastolic peak velocities, and improved insulin resistance. In conclusion, the discontinuation of GH in confirmed GHD adolescents is not followed by significant alterations of the common carotid arteries, despite the profound negative alterations of the lipid profile. In adolescents who were not confirmed to have GHD, IMT was increased while on GH therapy and normalized when they were taken off of GH.