Impact of removing OPTN region from vascularized composite allograft allocation.

On 6/18/2020, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented new policy replacing OPTN region with a 500 nautical mile (NM) circle around the donor hospital for the purpose of vascularized composite allograft (VCA) allocation. We used OPTN data to assess deceased donor VCA transplants in the 3 years pre- (6/19/2017-6/17/2020) vs. post-implementation (6/18/2020-6/17/2023). A total of 19 deceased donor VCA transplants were performed pre-policy (10 uterus, 3 bilateral upper limb, 1 unilateral upper limb, 3 face, 1 abdominal wall and 1 penis), and 11 post-policy (4 uterus, 1 bilateral upper limb, 2 face, 1 trachea, 2 abdominal wall, and 1 bilateral upper limb and face). Median distance from donor hospital to transplant hospital increased from 70 NM (range: 0-524 NM) pre-policy to 119 NM (range: 0-464 NM) post-policy. The majority of transplants in both policy eras were within 500 NM of the donor hospital [89.5% (N = 17/19) vs. 100% (N = 11/11)] and most remained within the same OPTN region as the donor hospital [68.4% (N = 13/19) vs. 90.9% (N = 10/11)]. Although it is difficult to draw strong conclusions about the policy's impact due to the low transplant volume and timing of implementation relative to the COVID-19 pandemic, data in the 3 years post-implementation suggest that 500 NM circles were a reasonable replacement for OPTN region in VCA allocation. The OPTN will continue to review data to monitor the policy's impact and inform future changes to VCA allocation, such as the transition to continuous distribution, a points-based framework expected to replace the current framework.

Dispersion of sneeze droplets in a meat facility indoor environment - Without partitions.

Spreading patterns of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) showed that infected and asymptotic carriers both played critical role in escalating transmission of virus leading to global pandemic. Indoor environments of restaurants, classrooms, hospitals, offices, large assemblies, and industrial installations are susceptible to virus outbreak. Industrial facilities such as fabrication rooms of meat processing plants, which are laden with moisture and fat in indoor air are the most sensitive spaces. Fabrication room workers standing next to each other are exposed to the risk of long-range viral droplets transmission within the facility. An asymptomatic carrier may transmit the virus unintentionally to fellow workers through sporadic sneezing leading to community spread. A novel Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of a fabrication room with typical interior (stationary objects) was prepared and investigated. Study was conducted to identify indoor airflow patterns, droplets spreading patterns, leading droplets removal mechanism, locations causing maximum spread of droplets, and infection index for workers along with stationary objects in reference to seven sneeze locations covering the entire room. The role of condensers, exhaust fans and leakage of indoor air through large and small openings to other rooms was investigated. This comprehensive study presents flow scenarios in the facility and helps identify locations that are potentially at lower or higher risk for exposure to COVID-19. The results presented in this study are suitable for future engineering analyses aimed at redesigning public spaces and common areas to minimize the spread of aerosols and droplets that may contain pathogens.

Renal transplantation: the last iteration of the rest of the world.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal transplantation systems across the world aim to achieve an optimal balance between fair access to deceased donor kidney transplants (equity) and efficient use of organs (utility). Kidney allocation systems are measured across a host of metrics, and there is no single agreed upon definition of success, which looks different for each system depending on the desired balance between equity and utility. This article evaluates the United States renal transplantation system's efforts to balance equity and utility while drawing comparisons to other national systems. RECENT FINDINGS: The United States renal transplantation system is expected to undergo major changes with the transition to a continuous distribution framework. The continuous distribution framework removes geographic boundaries and takes a flexible and transparent approach to balancing equity and utility. The framework leverages transplant professionals and community members input with mathematical optimization strategies to inform weighting of patient factors to allocate deceased donor kidneys. SUMMARY: The United States' proposed continuous allocation framework lays the groundwork for a system allowing transparent balancing of equity and utility. This system approach addresses issues common to those in many other countries.

Transplant of organs from donors with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing: A report from the organ procurement and transplantation network ad hoc disease transmission advisory committee.

BACKGROUND: Decisions to transplant organs from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors must balance risk of donor-derived transmission events (DDTE) with the scarcity of available organs. METHODS: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data were used to compare organ utilization and recipient outcomes between SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ and NAT- donors. NAT+ was defined by either a positive upper or lower respiratory tract (LRT) sample within 21 days of procurement. Potential DDTE were adjudicated by OPTN Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. RESULTS: From May 27, 2021 (date of OTPN policy for required LRT testing of lung donors) to January 31, 2022, organs were recovered from 617 NAT+ donors from all OPTN regions and 53 of 57 (93%) organ procurement organizations. NAT+ donors were younger and had higher organ quality scores for kidney and liver. Organ utilization was lower for NAT+ donors compared to NAT- donors. A total of 1241 organs (776 kidneys, 316 livers, 106 hearts, 22 lungs, and 21 other) were transplanted from 514 NAT+ donors compared to 21 946 organs from 8853 NAT- donors. Medical urgency was lower for recipients of NAT+ liver and heart transplants. The median waitlist time was longer for liver recipients of NAT+ donors. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for NAT+ donors for all organ types. Outcomes for hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day graft loss were similar for all organ types. No SARS-CoV-2 DDTE occurred in this interval. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ donor organs appears safe for short-term outcomes of death and graft loss and ameliorates the organ shortage. Further study is required to assure comparable longer term outcomes.

Does anybody really know what (the kidney median waiting) time is?

The median waiting time (MWT) to deceased donor kidney transplant is of interest to patients, clinicians, and the media but remains elusive due to both methodological and philosophical challenges. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from January 2003 to March 2022 to estimate MWTs using various methods and timescales, applied overall, by era, and by candidate demographics. After rising for a decade, the overall MWT fell to 5.19 years between 2015 and 2018 and declined again to 4.05 years (April 2021 to March 2022), based on the Kaplan-Meier method applied to period-prevalent cohorts. MWTs differed markedly by blood type, donor service area, and pediatric vs adult status, but to a lesser degree by race/ethnicity. Choice of methodology affected the magnitude of these differences. Instead of waiting years for an answer, reliable kidney MWT estimates can be obtained shortly after a policy is implemented using the period-prevalent Kaplan-Meier approach, a theoretical but useful construct for which we found no evidence of bias compared with using incident cohorts. We recommend this method be used complementary to the competing risks approach, under which MWT is often inestimable, to fill the present information void concerning the seemingly simple question of how long it takes to get a kidney transplant in the United States.

Risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmission Through Solid Organ Transplantation and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Recent Transplant Recipients.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmissible through lung transplantation, and outcomes among infected organ recipients may be severe. Transmission risk to extrapulmonary organ recipients and recent (within 30 days of transplantation) SARS-CoV-2-infected recipient outcomes are unclear. Methods: During March 2020-March 2021, potential SARS-CoV-2 transmissions through solid organ transplantation were investigated. Assessments included SARS-CoV-2 testing, medical record review, determination of likely transmission route, and recent recipient outcomes. Results: During March 2020-March 2021, approximately 42 740 organs were transplanted in the United States. Forty donors, who donated 140 organs to 125 recipients, were investigated. Nine (23%) donors and 25 (20%) recipients were SARS-CoV-2 positive by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Most (22/25 [88%]) SARS-CoV-2-infected recipients had healthcare or community exposures. Nine SARS-CoV-2-infected donors donated 21 organs to 19 recipients. Of these, 3 lung recipients acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections from donors with negative SARS-CoV-2 testing of pretransplant upper respiratory tract specimens but from whom posttransplant lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Sixteen recipients of extrapulmonary organs from SARS-CoV-2-infected donors had no evidence of posttransplant COVID-19. All-cause mortality within 45 days after transplantation was 6-fold higher among SARS-CoV-2-infected recipients (9/25 [36%]) than those without (6/100 [6%]). Conclusions: Transplant-transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is uncommon. Pretransplant NAAT of lung donor LRT specimens may prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through transplantation. Extrapulmonary organs from SARS-CoV-2-infected donors may be safely usable, although further study is needed. Reducing recent recipient exposures to SARS-CoV-2 should remain a focus of prevention.

The impact of machine perfusion of the heart on warm ischemia time and organ yield in donation after circulatory death.

Successful normothermic machine perfusion of heart allografts (MPH) has led to rapid growth in transplantation of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart allografts but has introduced complexity in the procurement process. This study examines the impact of MPH use in DCD procurements on warm ischemia time (WIT) and organ yield. DCD procurements from 2019 to 2020 were identified using the OPTN database. Procurements with and without the use of MPH were compared using propensity score matching. Observed to expected (O:E) yield ratios were calculated, where the expected values were obtained using the models developed by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. In total, 1237 DCD procurements met inclusion criteria (MPH: 109 and control: 1128). After PSM, no difference was found between groups in median total WIT (24.0 min vs. 24.0 min, p = .89), but the MPH group demonstrated shorter median operative WIT (circulatory arrest to cross-clamp; 8.7 min vs. 10.9 min, p = .003). The overall organ yield of DCD heart donors was observed to be 33% higher than expected (O:E 1.33; 95% CI: 1.22-1.45). Observed yield of non-heart organs was not significantly different from expected for liver, kidney, lung, and pancreas grafts. MPH use in DCD procurements does not lead to delays in WIT and does not negatively affect organ yield of other concurrently procured organs.

Kidney accelerated placement project: Outcomes and lessons learned.

Opportunities continue to be lost with a high rate of kidneys recovered for transplant but not utilized, particularly those considered less than ideal quality. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Organ Center is tasked with allocating arguably the most difficult-to-place kidneys, and we hypothesized an accelerated placement pathway would increase utilization of kidneys placed by the Organ Center. The Kidney Accelerated Placement (KAP) project, implemented by the Organ Center from July 18, 2019 to July 15, 2020, aimed to offer kidneys with a high kidney donor profile index to programs that had a history of accepting such organs. We compared OPTN kidney match run, donor, and transplant recipient data during the project period and 1 year prior. There was no statistically significant change in the percentage of KAP-eligible donors accepted during the project period (16.4%) compared to the prior year (17.5%). Conversion from acceptance to transplant was higher under KAP (72.7% vs. 71.2%), though not significant. Waiting to accelerate placement after kidneys have been declined by multiple transplant programs locally and regionally is an intervention that may come too late to effectively increase utilization. Transplant rates of nationally shared and marginal kidneys remain a challenge, and future iterations of this project should be investigated.

US deceased kidney transplantation: Estimated GFR, donor age and KDPI association with graft survival.

BACKGROUND: Despite a significant shortage of kidneys for transplantation in the US, kidneys from older deceased donors are infrequently transplanted. This is primarily over concern of graft quality and transplant durability. METHODS: The US national transplant database (2000-2018) was assessed for deceased donor kidney transplant patient and graft survival, graft durability and stratified by donor age (<65 years>), Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and estimated glomerual filtration rate (GFR) one year post-transplantation (eGFR-1) were calculated. FINDINGS: Recipients of kidneys transplanted from deceased donors >65 years had a lower eGFR-1, (median 39 ml/min) than recipients of younger donor kidneys (median 54 ml/min). However, death-censored graft survival, stratified by eGFR-1, demonstrated similar survival, irrespective of donor age or KDPI. The durability of kidney survival decreases as the achieved eGFR-1 declines. KDPI has a poor association with eGFR-1 and lesser for graft durability. While recipients of kidneys > 65 years had a higher one year mortality than younger kidney recipients, recipients of kidneys > 65 years and an eGFR-1 <30 ml/min, had a lower survival than an untransplanted waitlist cohort (p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: The durability of kidney graft survival after transplantation was associated with the amount of kidney function gained through the transplant (eGFR-1) and the rate of graft loss (return to dialysis) was not significantly associated with donor age. 24.9% of recipients of older donor kidneys failed to achieve sufficient eGFR-1 providing a transplant survival benefit. While there is significant benefit from transplanting older kidneys, better decision-making tools are required to avoid transplanting kidneys that provide insufficient renal function. FUNDING: None.

Understanding Dermatologic Concerns Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review and Discussion for Improved Delivery of Care.

There is a paucity of information surrounding dermatologic care for persons experiencing homelessness (PEH). This scoping review aims to map existing literature and provide a summary of the most common cutaneous manifestations among PEH, risk factors for dermatologic disease, describe any reported interventions, as well as identify research gaps for future studies. Search strategies developed for MEDLINE and hand searching yielded 486 articles. Out of the 486 articles screened, 93 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies concentrated in North America and Europe. Excluding the pediatric population, the prevalence of dermatologic conditions ranged from 16.6% to 53.5%. Common skin conditions described in PEH were: acne, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, and lichen simplex chronicus. There were no studies comparing the extent or severity of these cutaneous diseases in PEH and the general population. PEH have a higher prevalence of skin infections and non-melanoma skin cancers. This scoping review has direct implications on public health interventions for PEH and highlights the need for evidence-based interventions to provide optimum and safe dermatologic healthcare for PEH. We propose several recommendations for improved care delivery, including addressing upstream factors and comorbidities impacting skin health, providing trauma informed care, reducing barriers to care, preventing and managing skin conditions, as well as including PEH in the planning and implementation of any proposed intervention.

Cups for COVID: rapid implementation of a harm reduction initiative to support populations experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SETTING: As of June 10, 2020, 37 people experiencing homelessness or unstable housing in Calgary, Alberta, had developed lab-confirmed COVID-19. Spread occurred despite standard outbreak controls at affected shelter and supportive housing sites. Among these 37 cases, drink sharing was frequently identified as a modifiable mode of possible transmission. We collaborated with emergency shelters, a supportive housing site, and street and encampment outreach groups, using mixed service delivery by health staff, non-profits, and peers with lived experience with homelessness. INTERVENTION: To empower individuals to decrease COVID-19 transmission using a harm reduction approach, we provided disposable paper cups to service providers for distribution to clients. Service providers tracked the number of cups distributed. To assess effectiveness, we interviewed staff and peers who distributed the cups. OUTCOMES: Cup distribution was highest among populations with higher rates of alcohol use, and the intervention was well received by people who drink alcohol regularly, providing unique opportunities to promote COVID-19 awareness and safer drinking practices. Providers to these populations reported enthusiastic client engagement and repeat requests for cups for safer drinking. Intervention usefulness was limited in contexts with low alcohol consumption and in the absence of paired COVID-19 education. Provider reports suggest appropriate disposal of these cups after use. IMPLICATIONS: Disposable cups are a novel, rapidly implementable, low-cost harm reduction tool to empower people experiencing homelessness to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission due to drink sharing, ideally as part of a larger harm reduction and community education strategy.

RéSUMé: LIEU: Au 10 juin 2020, trente-sept (37) personnes sans abri ou vivant en logement instable à Calgary (Alberta) avaient contracté une infection par la COVID-19 confirmée en laboratoire. La maladie s'est propagée malgré les mesures types de contrôle des éclosions dans les refuges et les logements supervisés touchés. Parmi ces 37 cas, le partage de boissons a souvent été défini comme un mode de transmission modifiable possible. En collaboration avec des refuges d'urgence, un complexe de logements supervisés et des groupes menant des activités de proximité dans la rue et les campements, nous avons assuré une prestation de services mixte par des personnels de santé, des organisations sans but lucratif et des pairs ayant une expérience vécue de sans-abrisme. INTERVENTION: Pour donner à chaque personne les moyens de réduire la transmission de la COVID-19 selon une approche de réduction des méfaits, nous avons fourni aux dispensateurs de services des gobelets en papier jetables à distribuer à leurs usagers. Les dispensateurs ont fait un suivi du nombre de gobelets distribués. Pour évaluer l'efficacité de l'initiative, nous avons interviewé le personnel et les pairs ayant distribué les gobelets. RéSULTATS: Le nombre de gobelets distribués a été le plus élevé dans les populations ayant des taux élevés de consommation d'alcool, et l'intervention a été bien accueillie par les personnes qui consomment régulièrement de l'alcool; elle a offert des occasions uniques de faire de la sensibilisation à la COVID-19 et de promouvoir une pratique de consommation de boissons à moindre risque. Les intervenants auprès de ces populations ont fait état d'une participation enthousiaste des usagers et de demandes répétées de gobelets pour boire sans s'exposer au risque de contracter la maladie. L'utilité de l'intervention a été limitée dans les contextes de faible consommation d'alcool et en l'absence d'une sensibilisation conjointe à la COVID-19. Selon les rapports des dispensateurs de services, les gobelets ont été correctement éliminés après usage. CONSéQUENCES: Les gobelets jetables sont un nouvel outil de réduction des méfaits à prix abordable qui peut être mis en œuvre rapidement pour donner aux personnes aux prises avec le sans-abrisme les moyens de réduire le risque de transmission de la COVID-19 lorsqu'elles partagent des boissons, idéalement dans le cadre d'une stratégie de réduction des méfaits et de sensibilisation de proximité.

SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Recent Organ Recipients, March-May 2020, United States.

We conducted public health investigations of 8 organ transplant recipients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Findings suggest the most likely source of transmission was community or healthcare exposure, not the organ donor. Transplant centers should educate transplant candidates and recipients about infection prevention recommendations.

Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial impacts and responses of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States.

COVID-19 has been sweeping the globe, hitting the United States particularly hard with a state of emergency declared on March 13, 2020. Transplant hospitals have taken various precautions to protect patients from potential exposure. OPTN donor, candidate, and transplant data were analyzed from January 5, 2020 to September 5, 2020. The number of new waiting list registrations decreased, with the Northeast seeing over a 50% decrease from the week of 3/8 versus the week of 4/5. The national transplant system saw near cessation of living donor transplantation (-90%) from the week of 3/8 to the week of 4/5. Similarly, deceased donor kidney transplant volume dropped from 367 to 202 (-45%), and other organs saw similar decreases: lung (-70%), heart (-43%), and liver (-37%). Deceased donors recovered dropped from 260 to 163 (-45%) from 3/8 compared to 4/5, including a 67% decrease for lungs recovered. The magnitude of this decrease varied by geographic area, with the largest percent change (-67%) in the Northeast. Despite the pandemic, discard rates across organ has remained stable. Although the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, OPTN data show recent evidence of stabilization, an indication that an early recovery of the number of living and deceased donors and transplants has ensued.

Maximizing donors' gifts: A comparison of actual and expected solid organ yield among VCA donors.

Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA) transplantation provides life-changing transplants, but VCA adds complexity to the donation process and timing, possibly impeding solid organ donation. Expanding upon descriptive analyses, this study examines risk-adjusted predictions versus the observed number of organs donated by VCA donors. Our cohort included VCA donors in the United States during January 1, 2008-December 31, 2017 (n = 51), using OPTN Deceased Donor Registration Form data and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) donor yield models to calculate observed-to-expected (O:E) yield ratios. Almost all VCA donors' livers (48/51; 94.1%) and kidneys (92/102; 90.2%) were transplanted, with fewer hearts (28/51; 54.9%), lungs (46/102; 45.1%), pancreata (15/51; 29.4%), and intestines (3/51; 5.9%) transplanted. O:E ratios for overall organ yield were slightly greater than expected for VCA donors (1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17). Liver (1.17: 1.08-1.27) and lung yields (1.38: 1.07-1.68) were both greater than expected, while kidney, heart, and pancreas yields were similar to expected. Across VCA types, bilateral upper limb and abdominal wall donors had better-than-expected yields while uterus, face, and unilateral upper limb donors all had similar-to-expected yields. Solid organ yield among VCA donors was as good or better than predicted, suggesting that VCA donation does not compromise recovery and transplantation of lifesaving organs.