Balancing Risks and Benefits: Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a new class of drugs that have been proven beneficial in the management of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure and in the mitigation of cardiovascular risk. The benefits of SGLT2i therapy have led to the rapid adoption of these drugs in clinical guidelines. Since the introduction of these drugs, concerns have arisen, as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) unexpectedly occurred in patients treated with SGLT2i. DKA is an infrequent but serious complication of SGLT2i therapy, and is potentially preventable. The risk factors for the development of SGLT2i-associated DKA are inappropriate dose reductions of insulin, the dietary restriction of carbohydrates, and factors that may increase insulin demand such as excessive alcohol intake and major surgery. Moreover, the risk of SGLT2i-associated DKA is higher in persons with type 1 diabetes. It is crucial that both patients and healthcare providers are aware of the risks of SGLT2i-associated DKA. In an effort to encourage safe prescribing of this effective class of drugs, we present two cases that illustrate the risks of SGLT2i therapy with regard to the development of DKA.

Tolerance-based capecitabine dose escalation after DPYD genotype-guided dosing in heterozygote DPYD variant carriers: a single-center observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Certain polymorphisms of the DPYD gene encoding for the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme are associated with fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. Dose reductions of the fluoropyrimidine prodrug capecitabine are recommended for patients carrying these DPYD variants to prevent toxicities. Capecitabine dose escalation after an initial genotype-guided dose reduction is advocated when treatment is well tolerated. However, practical guidelines on how to implement these dose escalations are lacking. We implemented a protocol for tolerance-guided capecitabine dosing in DPYD variant carriers and aimed to explore its effect on toxicity of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for different types of solid tumors were identified retrospectively. Capecitabine doses were reduced in case of a DPYD variant (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, DPYD*13, or c.1236G>A) and subsequently adjusted on the basis of tolerance. Outcome was evaluated by clinical chart review and dosing characteristics from the hospital pharmacy. Results were compared with a cohort of capecitabine-treated DPYD wild-type patients. RESULTS: Of 185 patients eligible for analysis, 11 patients were heterozygous for a DPYD variant. A median dose escalation of 8.5% was achieved using the prespecified protocol. One DPYD variant carrier experienced a grade 3 toxicity after a dose escalation. Overall, DPYD variant carriers did not experience more, or more severe toxicities than DPYD wild-type patients. The total prevalence of severe toxicities in the wild-type group was 43.1% and is comparable with the literature. CONCLUSION: Tolerance-based capecitabine dose escalation did not lead to more toxicity in DPYD variant carriers compared with wild-type patients. Our results can guide future prospective research.