Modified Borggreve-Van Nes-Winkelmann rotationplasty for surgery in developing countries.

BACKGROUND: Amputation is still the most common therapy for patients suffering from osteosarcoma in Myanmar, despite the fact that limb salvage surgery e.g. Borggreve-Van Nes-Winkelmann rotationplasty for malignant tumors located within the distal femur or proximal tibia is the current state-of-the-art reconstructive procedure. A safe and reliable operation technique is crucial in order to perform a complex surgical procedure like the rotationplasty in lower-middle income economies with limited infrastructure and resources. The authors present seven cases of patients with osteosarcomas that received a Borggreve-Van Nes-Winkelmann rotationplasty with an evaluation of the procedures focusing on safety and sustainability. METHODS: From 2019 until 2020, seven young patients with osteosarcomas of the distal femur or proximal tibia were treated with Borggreve-Van Nes-Winkelmann rotationplasties in the Orthopaedic Hospital in Mandalay, Myanmar. As modification of the standard procedure the dissection and subsequent clamping of the femoral artery in order to minimize blood loss as well as the formation of an adipocutaneous flap that minimizes swelling and decreases the pressure on the vessels were successfully performed. This modified procedure resembles a safe and simplified surgical technique that is feasible under the circumstances of lower-middle income economies with good outcomes. RESULTS: All patients showed good functional and aesthetic results. One of the seven patients needed secondary wound closure due to wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified and safe operation technique for the performance of the Van Nes-Borggreve rotationplasty was adapted to the given constraints in lower-middle income economies and proved to be successful. Trial registration All patients approved to participate in the study and have given consent to publication.

Factors affecting outcomes after supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomosis in a defined patient population.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment for lymphedema is still subject of intensive research. Therefore, it is vital to investigate what significance lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the short- and long-term results as well as the most important factors that can improve outcomes after LVA. METHODS: This study includes a complete data set of 26 patients who received LVA for a therapy-resistant lymphedema. Patients were followed up for an average of 23 months. RESULTS: 50% of the patients reported a subjective improvement. Without conservative treatment after the operation the patients showed significant better results (100% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.030). The localization of lymphedema as well as the region of LVA had a significant influence. In patients with lymphedema affecting the entire leg, symptom improvement was significantly lower (35.3% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.039). Patients who received LVA in an upper limb show a significantly higher improvement in symptoms than patients who received LVA in a lower limb (100% vs. 30%, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors with a significant influence on the outcome of patients after receiving LVA. Patients with early-stage upper extremity lymphedema seem to benefit most from this procedure.

Predictive factors for better bypass patency and limb salvage after prosthetic above-knee bypass reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the most underestimated diseases because of its high prevalence and unfavorable prognosis. Many PAD patients without suitable autologous veins or options for endovascular treatment receive prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass (PAKB). Until now predictors of prosthetic bypass failure and of increased amputation risk remain indistinct. This study aimed to identify predictive factors associated with better bypass patency and limb salvage to achieve a more favorable outcome after PAKB reconstruction. METHODS: Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data of 244 PAKB procedures performed at a German university medical center were collected and analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. To our knowledge this 12-year experience is the largest retrospective study to identify predictors for patency and limb salvage after PAKB reconstruction. RESULTS: Of the PAD patients 94% (229/244) were followed for an average of 34.9 months. Patient cohorts characteristics were: mean age, 66.1 years, 181 men (74%), claudication (64%), rest pain (16%), ischemic lesions (20%), arterial hypertension (92%), smoking (79%), hyperlipidemia (65%) and type 2 diabetes (43%). Cumulative primary 1- and 3-year graft patency rates were 60.8% and 50.7%, respectively, and cumulative 1- and 3-year limb salvage rates were 89.3% and 86.1%, respectively. One hundred seven bypasses (43.9%) failed, 26 patients (10.7%) required a major and seven patients (2.9%) required a minor amputation. Overall survival rates of PAD patients after 1- and 3-years were 94.4% and 82.9%, respectively. Subjective symptom improvement was found to be the most important prognostic follow-up factor for graft patency and limb salvage. Patients with recurrent symptoms in the follow-up had an increased risk of emerging bypass failure compared with patients with subjective symptom improvement (patency at 1 year: 40.8% vs 100% and at 3 years: 26% vs 100%; P < .001). No patient with subjective improvement in symptoms during follow-up underwent an amputation (limb salvage at 1 year: 100% vs 79% and at 3 years: 100% vs 72.8%; P < .001). Therefore, subjective symptom improvement should be the decisive criterion to determine follow-up intervals of PAD patients. In univariate analysis further significant factors associated with better graft patency and limb salvage rates were: claudication compared with critical ischemia, larger graft diameter (>6 mm), pre- and postoperative antiplatelet therapy, statin therapy independent from lipid values after PAKB revascularization, and an experienced vascular surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we determined the subjective improvement in symptoms as the most important prognostic factor for bypass function and limb salvage after PAKB. Furthermore, disease stage of critical ischemia, graft diameter, preoperative aspirin use, and postoperative statin medication were independent predictive factors. Therefore, PAD patients should be treated with aspirin pre- and postoperatively as well as with a statin postoperatively. In case of PAKB reconstruction only prostheses with a large diameter (>6 mm) should be used and the procedure should be performed by an experienced surgeon. Considering these results with regard to the predictive factors for better graft patency and limb salvage rates a significant more favorable outcome during the follow-up and an increased 5-year patency rate for PAKB reconstructions can be expected.