Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Hernia ; 19(4): 549-55, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25092408

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is considered the most common and serious long-term problem after inguinal hernia repair. Young age has been described as a risk factor for developing chronic pain after several surgical procedures. Our aim was to assess if age has prognostic value on CPIP. METHODS: The database of a randomized trial; the LEVEL trial, 669 patients, TEP versus Lichtenstein, was used for analysis. Data on incidence and intensity of preoperative pain, postoperative pain and CPIP at 1 year were collected. The association of age with incidence and intensity of pain was assessed with regression analysis. Further, hernia type and surgical technique were studied in combination with age and CPIP as possible risk factors on CPIP over age alone. RESULTS: Younger patients (18-40 years) presented more often with CPIP than middle-aged patients (40-60 years) and elderly (>60 years); 43 vs. 29 vs. 19 %; overall 27 %. Younger and middle-aged patients had more frequently preoperative pain; 54 vs. 55 vs. 41 % and intensity of pain was higher during the first three postoperative days (VAS on day 1: 5.5 vs. 4.5 vs. 3.9 and on day 3: 3.8 vs. 2.9 vs. 2.6). Indirect-type hernias were seen more often in younger patients (77 vs. 51 vs. 48 %) and were not related to CPIP or with surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one out of three patients experiences CPIP. The younger the patient, the higher the risk of CPIP. Hernia type and surgical technique did not influence CPIP.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Feminino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem
2.
Br J Surg ; 100(6): 735-42, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23436683

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain remains a frequent complication after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. As a consequence, mesh fixation using glue instead of sutures has become popular. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify which fixation technique is to be preferred for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 1990 and April 2012 were searched for in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue and sutured mesh fixation in elective Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernia were included. The quality of the RCTs and the potential risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Of 254 papers found in the initial search, a meta-analysis was conducted of seven RCTs comprising 1185 patients. With the use of glue mesh fixation, the duration of operation was shorter (mean difference -2·57 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) -4·88 to -0·26) min; P = 0·03), patients had lower visual analogue scores for postoperative pain (mean difference -0·75 (-1·18 to -0·33); P = 0·001), early chronic pain occurred less often (risk ratio 0·52, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·01), and time to return to daily activities was shorter (mean difference -1·17 (-2·30 to -0·03) days; P = 0·04). The hernia recurrence rate did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Elective Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia using glue mesh fixation compared with sutures is faster and less painful, with comparable hernia recurrence rates.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Técnicas de Sutura , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Dor Crônica/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
3.
Hernia ; 17(1): 89-94, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22903650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complications after thoracic surgery have well been established, pain being the most prominent. Intercostal nerves are mixed type nerves combining motor and sensory functions. This notion is not consistent with the incidence of PTPS compared to the incidence of muscle paresis or paralysis. We would hypothesize that abdominal wall paresis or paralysis is underdiagnosed. METHODS: In our hospital, three patients developed abdominal wall paralysis after thoracic surgery and consequent nerve damage. Their cases are discussed, and a review of the literature was conducted concerning (intercostal) nerve damage on a cellular level, the anatomy of the intercostal nerve, prevention of intercostal nerve damage and surgical techniques. RESULTS: A cellular cascade known as Wallerian degeneration and regeneration determine whether a damaged nerve can function again. The recovery of the nerve is highly dependent on the correct function of activated Schwann cells and macrophages and is related to the amount of damage that has taken place. The anatomy of the intercostal nerve makes it susceptible to injury. Retractor placement during open thoracic surgery has shown to effect compression injury and induced mechanical deformation and damage. Given the known factors of pathophysiology and anatomy, a number of preventive measures have been tested to reduce intercostal nerve damage. Several techniques have been proposed, but the most used technique, the video-assisted thoracic surgery, has been the most effective in reducing nerve damage. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall paralysis is an underdiagnosed complication after thoracic surgery. The amount of stress on the intercostal nerves could be reduced with less invasive techniques such as the VATS technique.


Assuntos
Parede Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Nervos Intercostais/lesões , Paralisia/etiologia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/complicações , Toracotomia/efeitos adversos , Parede Abdominal/inervação , Humanos , Hipestesia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Reto do Abdome/inervação , Reto do Abdome/fisiopatologia
4.
Br J Surg ; 100(2): 209-16, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23034741

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open cholecystectomy (OC) is often preferred over laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but evidence is lacking to support this practice. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify which surgical technique is preferable for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 1990 and October 2011 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of OC versus LC for cholecystolithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis were included. The quality of the RCTs was assessed using the Jadad criteria. RESULTS: Following review of 1422 papers by title and abstract, a meta-analysis was conducted of four RCTs comprising 234 surgical patients. They provided evidence of at least level 2b on the Oxford Level of Evidence Scale, but scored poorly according to the Jadad criteria. Some 97·0 per cent of the patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) grade A or B liver cirrhosis. In all, 96·6 per cent underwent elective surgery. No postoperative deaths were reported. LC was associated with fewer postoperative complications (risk ratio 0·52, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·29 to 0·92; P = 0·03), a shorter hospital stay (mean difference -3·05 (95 per cent c.i. -4·09 to -2·01) days; P < 0·001) and quicker resumption of a normal diet (mean difference -27·48 (-30·96 to -23·99) h; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Patients with CTP grade A or B liver cirrhosis who undergo LC for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis have fewer overall postoperative complications, a shorter hospital stay and resume a normal diet more quickly than those who undergo OC.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistolitíase/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Adulto , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistolitíase/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos
5.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 26(1): 47-59, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22482525

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to review systematically morbidity and mortality after non-hepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles using the words: liver failure, hepatic insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, cirrhosis, cirrhotic, surgical procedures, operative complications, operative mortality, postoperative complications, surgical complication, surgical risk, hernia. RESULTS: Forty-six articles were selected from 5247 included after the initial search. Level of evidence provided in the articles varied greatly. Non-hepatic surgery of patients with cirrhosis resulted in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to similar surgery for non-cirrhotic patients. Cholecystectomy and umbilical and inguinal hernia correction were associated with the lowest increased morbidity and mortality while pancreatic surgery, cardiovascular, and trauma surgery correlated with the highest. The preoperative model for end stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores appeared to be predictive of postoperative risks. Portal hypertension and surgery in the emergency setting were associated with extra increased mortality and morbidity rates. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of the literature showed that in patients with liver cirrhosis who undergo non-hepatic surgery, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates varied greatly depending on severity of the cirrhosis and the surgical procedure. However, the majority of procedures can be safely performed in patients with low MELD scores or CTP A cirrhosis without portal hypertension.


Assuntos
Cirrose Hepática/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Morbidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Sobrevida
6.
Acta Radiol ; 52(9): 943-50, 2011 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21969704

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have been published on the matter of abdominal aortic and iliac calcifications and the association to clinical entities such as diabetes mellitus and renal failure. However, comparing of these studies is questionable since quantification methods for atherosclerosis differ. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of image acquisition settings, reconstruction parameters, and analysis methods on calcium quantification in the abdominal aorta. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Calcium scores were retrospectively determined on standardized abdominal CT scans of 15 patients. Two researchers obtained calcium scores with 10 different lower thresholds (LT) (130, 145, 160, 175, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 1000) in CT scans with and without contrast enhancement, with slice thicknesses (ST) varying between 2.0-5.0 mm for the non-contrast-enhanced series and between 1.0-5.0 mm for the contrast-enhanced series. In addition calcium scores obtained with two convolution kernels (B10f, B20f) were compared. Inter-observer variability was calculated. RESULTS: Calcium scoring at higher STs is overestimated compared to smaller STs and this effect was more pronounced with increasing calcium loads. Concerning the convolution kernel, scores obtained with kernel B10f were overestimated compared to kernel B20f. Increase of LT resulted in a decrease of the calcium score and scoring in contrast-enhanced series resulted in higher scores compared to non-contrast-enhanced series. These effects are more apparent in patients with higher calcium loads. Calcium scoring reproducibility with the reference standard is limited for the aorta-iliac trajectory, whereas scoring with the remaining settings is reproducible. CONCLUSION: Scores obtained with different settings cannot be compared. The inter-observer reproducibility was limited using the reference standard and practical difficulties were substantial. Scoring with higher LT, ST, and contrast enhancement is faster and has less practical difficulties.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/química , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia , Cálcio/análise , Artéria Ilíaca/química , Artéria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...