Mesenchymal stromal cell characteristics vary depending on their origin.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are rare progenitor cells that can be isolated from various tissues. They exhibit multilineage differentiation potential, support regenerative processes, and interact with various immune cells. Therefore, MSCs represent a promising tool for regenerative medicine. However, source-dependent and donor-dependent differences of MSC properties, including implications on their clinical application are still largely unknown. We evaluated MSCs derived from perinatal tissues umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) in comparison to adult MSCs from bone marrow (BM), which were used as gold standard. We found genetic background-independent differences between MSCs from UC and AM. While AM- and UC-MSCs were closer to each other than to BM-MSCs, they also exhibited differences between each other. AM-MSCs from different donors but not UC-MSCs displayed high interdonor variability. In addition, we show that although all MSCs expressed similar surface markers, MSC populations from UC and AM showed differential profiles of gene expression and paracrine factor secretion to BM-derived MSCs. Notably, pathway analysis of gene expression data revealed intriguing differences between MSCs suggesting that MSCs from UC and AM possess in general a higher potential of immunomodulatory capacity, whereas BM-MSCs showed a higher potential of supporting regenerative processes as exemplified by neuronal differentiation and development. These differences between perinatal and BM-derived MSCs may be relevant for clinical applications.

A Toll-like receptor 2/6 agonist reduces allergic airway inflammation in chronic respiratory sensitisation to Timothy grass pollen antigens.

BACKGROUND: The hygiene hypothesis negatively correlates the microbial burden of the environment with the prevalence of T helper type 2 (Th2)-related disorders, e.g. allergy and asthma. This is explained by Th1 triggering through pathogen-associated molecular patterns via Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In this study, the biological effects of a TLR2/6 agonist as a potential treatment of allergic inflammation are explored. METHODS: In a model of chronic allergic airway inflammation induced by intranasal administration of Timothy grass pollen allergen extract, early TLR agonism and/or interferon (IFN)-gamma administration was compared to the therapeutic and immune-modulating effects of dexamethasone with regard to the cellular inflammation and cytokine profiles. RESULTS: Eosinophilic inflammation was clearly reduced by TLR2/6 agonism. This effect was also seen without simultaneous administration of IFN-gamma. However, lymphocyte counts were not affected among the different treatment groups. More precise determination of the lymphocyte-mediated immune reaction showed that TLR2/6 agonism induced neither CD4+foxp3+ regulatory T cells in draining lymph nodes nor a pronounced Th1 immune response. In contrast, dexamethasone reduced both sensitisation as well as allergic inflammation and, in addition, CD11c+ antigen-presenting cells in lymph nodes. Our data clearly point to the potential to rebalance Th2-skewed allergic immune responses by therapeutic TLR2/6 agonist administration. CONCLUSION: The use of the TLR2/6 agonist is a promising therapeutic approach in diseases with an imbalance in T cell responses, such as allergy and asthma.