Oral bioavailability and disposition of [14C]omapatrilat in healthy subjects.

The objective of this study was to determine the absolute oral bioavailability and disposition of omapatrilat. This single-dose, randomized, crossover study of 20 mg intravenous and 50 mg oral [14C]omapatrilat was conducted in 12 healthy male subjects to determine the disposition and oral bioavailability of omapatrilat, an orally active vasopeptidase inhibitor. Blood samples were collected up to 120 hours, and the excreta were collected over 168 hours postdose. Plasma concentrations of omapatrilat were determined by a validated LC/MS/MS procedure. Radioactivity in blood, plasma, urine, and feces was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Urinary excretion of radioactivity averaged 80% and 64% of intravenous and oral doses, respectively; < 1% of oral dose was excreted unchanged in urine. The absolute oral bioavailability of omapatrilat averaged 31%. Total body clearance of omapatrilat (80 L/h) exceeded liver plasma flow. Apparent steady-state volume of distribution of omapatrilat (21 L/kg) was extremely high compared with total body water. Omapatrilat undergoes substantial presystemic first-pass metabolism after oral administration. Omapatrilat is eliminated primarily by metabolism, and its metabolites are eliminated primarily in urine. Extrahepatic organs may be involved in the elimination of omapatrilat. Plasma concentrations of omapatrilat exhibit a prolonged terminal elimination phase, which represents elimination from a deep compartment.

Effect of food and pharmacokinetic variability on didanosine systemic exposure in HIV-infected children. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 144 Study Team.

The effect of food on didanosine bioavailability and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability was examined in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Didanosine pharmacokinetics were determined during fasting and fed conditions in HIV-infected children enrolled in the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 144 randomized to receive didanosine at 50 mg/m2 or 150 mg/m2 orally every 12 hr. Pharmacokinetic parameters from patients in the low (n = 39) and high (n = 38) dosing groups were not significantly different, but intersubject variability was substantial. The fraction absorbed was higher while fasting than with food (0.27+/-0.13 versus 0.19+/-0.09, p < 0.0001); the zero order absorption rate was faster (0.48+/-0.31 versus 0.76+/-0.72 hr, p = 0.003); and the plasma half-life was shorter (0.93+/-0.43 versus 1.39+/-0.65 hr, p < 0.0001). The lower fraction absorbed with food was offset by the absorption rate becoming rate limiting for elimination, resulting in similar areas under the concentration-time curves (normalized to 100 mg/m2) when fasted (853.9+/-465.8 microg/liter-hr) versus fed (796.3+/-367.5 microg/liter x hr). Oral clearances during fasting (152.5+/-81.7 liters/hr/m2) and fed states (163.6+/-99.3 liters/hr/m2) were similar, but these values in children are substantially higher than previously reported for adults. The systemic exposure (i.e., AUC) of didanosine was highly variable in children but similar in the presence and absence of food. Administration of didanosine with food in children may be permissible if total systemic exposure rather than maximum plasma concentration is sufficient for antiretroviral activity. The higher oral clearance and substantial pharmacokinetic variability suggest the need to reexamine current didanosine dose recommendations for HIV-infected children.

A multiple-dose pharmacokinetic interaction study between didanosine (Videx) and ciprofloxacin (Cipro) in male subjects seropositive for HIV but asymptomatic.

The pharmacokinetics of didanosine and ciprofloxacin were evaluated following the administration of multiple oral doses of each drug as a single agent or in combination. Didanosine was dosed as the Videx chewable/dispersible tablet, which contains the antacids dihydroxyaluminum sodium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide. Sixteen HIV-seropositive male subjects were randomly assigned to two groups of eight each. Group A received didanosine (200 mg q 12h) for 3d, followed by didanosine (200 mg q 12h) and ciprofloxacin (750 mg q 12h) for 3d, and finished with another course of didanosine (200 mg q 12h for 3 d). Group B began with ciprofloxacin, followed by the combination, and finished with ciprofloxacin using the same doses and schedule as utilized in group A. During the combination phase of the study, ciprofloxacin was administered 2 h prior to didanosine. Serial blood and urine samples were collected on study days 4, 8, and 12 for the quantitative determination of didanosine and ciprofloxacin using validated HPLC methods. The plasma and urine data were subjected to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. A statistically significant decrease in the average AUC and UR values of ciprofloxacin was noted when it was given with didanosine, relative to administration as a single agent. However, the magnitude of the decrease in these parameters, approximately 26 and 29%, respectively, was not considered clinically significant. The apparent decrease in the bioavailability of ciprofloxacin was probably due to the formation of a chelation complex between it and the aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacids found in the didanosine tablet. Other than an approximately 16% decrease in AUC, ciprofloxacin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of didanosine. The data from the present study demonstrate that didanosine or ciprofloxacin can be added to a treatment regimen consisting of the other single agent and that cessation of treatment with one agent does not have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of the other drug. The dose of ciprofloxacin must be taken at least 2h prior to didanosine to avoid a clinically significant interaction with the antacids present in the didanosine formulation.

Disposition of didanosine in HIV-seropositive patients with normal renal function or chronic renal failure: influence of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of didanosine in patients with normal kidney function or chronic kidney failure. METHODS: Three groups of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were studied: group I, six men with normal kidney function (creatinine clearance > 90 ml/min/1.73 m2); group II, six men with chronic renal failure maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); and group III, four men and two women with chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis three times a week. A 300 mg dose of didanosine was administered orally and intravenously according to a two-period randomized crossover design. Patients in group III were studied between hemodialysis sessions during the crossover periods. In addition, patients in group III were studied in a third period after administration of a 300 mg oral dose of didanosine 4 hours before hemodialysis. RESULTS: After intravenous administration in group I, the mean (+/-SD) total clearance (CLT) was 13.0 +/- 1.6 ml/min/kg and the elimination half-life (t 1/2) was 1.56 +/- 0.43 hour. In groups II and III, the CLT decreased significantly to 3.4 +/- 1.2 and 3.2 +/- 1.2 ml/min/kg, respectively, whereas the t1/2 increased to 3.60 +/- 0.82 hours and 3.11 +/- 0.88 hours, respectively. The absolute bioavailability of didanosine in groups I, II, and III was 42% +/- 12%, 52% +/- 6%, and 38% +/- 11%, respectively, and did not differ significantly. CAPD had little effect on the removal of didanosine, whereas approximately 30% of the drug present in the body at the start of dialysis was eliminated by an average 3-hour dialysis session. CONCLUSION: The clearance of didanosine is impaired in patients with chronic renal failure. To compensate, the dose and schedule of administration should be adjusted. It is recommended that one-fourth of the total daily dose of didanosine be administered once a day in this patient population.

A pharmacokinetic interaction study of didanosine coadministered with trimethoprim and/or sulphamethoxazole in HIV seropositive asymptomatic male patients.

1. The pharmacokinetics of didanosine, trimethoprim, and sulphamethoxazole were evaluated in ten HIV seropositive asymptomatic patients as single agents and upon coadministration of single doses. 2. Using a randomized, balanced incomplete block crossover study with at least a 1-week washout period between successive treatments, each patient under fasting conditions received four of the following five treatments: 200 mg didanosine as a single agent; 200 mg trimethoprim + 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole; 200 mg trimethoprim + 200 mg didanosine; 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole + 200 mg of didanosine and; 200 mg trimethoprim + 1000 mg sulphamethoxazole + 200 mg didanosine. 3. Serial blood and urine samples were collected following the administration of each treatment. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.)/ultraviolet assays specific for unchanged didanosine, trimethoprim and/or sulphamethoxazole. 4. Percent urinary recovery (%UR) and renal clearance (CLR) emerged as consistently affected parameters, being decreased in the case of didanosine (35%, P = 0.016) and trimethoprim (32%, P = 0.019) and increased in the case of sulphamethoxazole (39%, P = 0.079), when all three agents were coadministered. The magnitude of the changes in didanosine CLR and %UR values was no greater when both trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole were coadministered vs when each single agent was given with didanosine, suggesting that any effect was not additive. 5. Other key parameters such as Cmax, AUC, and t1/2 for didanosine (1309.9 ng ml-1, 1796.9 ng ml-1 h, and 1.61 h, respectively), trimethoprim (1.96 micrograms ml-1, 22.86 micrograms ml-1 h, and 9.03 h, respectively) or sulphamethoxazole (58.62 micrograms ml-1, 799.7 micrograms ml-1 h and 9.84 h, respectively) were not affected when didanosine was coadministered with either trimethoprim (didanosine: 1751.9 ng ml-1, 2158.0 ng ml-1 h, and 1.28 h; trimethoprim: 1.81 micrograms ml-1, 28.89 micrograms ml-1 h, and 11.4 h), sulphamethoxazole (didanosine: 1279.3 ng ml-1, 1793.2 ng ml-1 h, and 1.61 h; sulphamethoxazole: 53.57 micrograms ml-1, 732.1 micrograms ml-1 h, and 8.95 h), or the combination of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole (didanosine: 1283.7 ng ml-1, 1941.8 ng ml-1 h, and 1.38 h; trimethoprim: 1.59 micrograms ml-1, 26.68 micrograms ml-1 h, and 11.3 h; sulphamethoxazole: 59.48 micrograms ml-1, 760.9 micrograms ml-1 h, and 9.47 h). 6. Because the observed differences in CLR and %UR are small and not considered to be clinically relevant, it is not necessary to alter the dosing regimens of didanosine, trimethoprim or sulphamethoxazole when administered in combination to HIV seropositive patients.

Effect of temperature on the high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of the anti-HIV agents, didanosine and stavudine.

This paper examines the effect of temperature on the chromatographic separation characteristics of anti-HIV agents, didanosine and stavudine. As a result of lowering the column temperature, an improved resolution between didanosine and stavudine peaks is observed. Thus, lower temperatures may permit the simultaneous monitoring of didanosine and stavudine levels.

Didanosine (ddl) and stavudine (d4T): absence of peripheral neurotoxicity in rabbits.

Some 20 male New Zealand White rabbits (five/group) were given either didanosine (ddl) or stavudine (d4T) at 750 and 1500 mg/kg body weight/day by oral intubation for 24 wk. An additional group was given 300 mg/kg body weight/day zidovudine (AZT) as a negative control. After 13 weeks the high dose of ddl was lowered from 1500 to 1000 mg/kg body weight/day following the death of one rabbit and continued inappetence in the dose group. The rabbits were observed daily, plasma drug levels were monitored, and electrophysiological measurements of peripheral nerve conduction were performed during the study. Additionally, body weight and food intake were recorded, and clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Sections of selected peripheral nerves, and dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots were examined by light and transmission electron microscopy. Although peripheral neuropathy has been reported in rabbits with the nucleoside analogue zalcitabine (ddC), based on clinical observations, electrophysiological measurements, and light and electron microscopy, no evidence of peripheral neurotoxicity was observed in rabbits given either ddl of d4T.

Analysis of potential risk factors associated with the development of pancreatitis in phase I patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex receiving didanosine.

Phase I dose-escalating trials of didanosine revealed dose-limiting toxicities, including pancreatitis, and established a total daily dose of 12.5 mg/kg/day as the maximum tolerated dose. Clinical and pharmacokinetic data of 61 patients from two trials were analyzed to further evaluate the risk of pancreatitis: 1 (6.3%) of 16 patients who received < 500 mg/day didanosine, 2 (13.3%) of 15 who received 500-750 mg/day, and 15 (50%) of 30 who received > 750 mg/day developed pancreatitis (P < .001). A relationship between risk of pancreatitis and steady-state plasma concentrations of didanosine and age was also observed, suggesting that knowledge of didanosine pharmacokinetics provided additional information regarding risk of toxicity. Further confirmation of these findings will be necessary to determine if the risk factors for pancreatitis remain the same at lower doses currently used.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with the sepsis syndrome.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of cefepime after administration of multiple doses to seven patients with the sepsis syndrome. Patients ranged in age from 66 to 78 years (mean +/- S.D.: 74 +/- 5 years); all fulfilled the criteria of the sepsis syndrome and had APACHE-II scores between 14 and 21 (mean +/- S.D.: 17 +/- 2). Serial blood and urine samples were collected after a minimum of 3 days (steady state) of treatment with cefepime 2.0 g bd i.v. Cefepime was assayed by HPLC. Data were analysed using non-compartmental methods. The mean +/- S.D. creatinine clearance (Clcr) was 55 +/- 8 mL/min. Mean +/- S.D. values for selected pharmacokinetic parameters on day 5 were Cmax (94.2 +/- 23.9 mg/L), T1/2 (3.4 +/- 1.1 h), Vdss (32.6 +/- 17.5 L), and the total clearance Cl(total) (125 +/- 51 mL/min). Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) and area under curve (AUC) averaged 0.7 +/- 0.2 h and 305 +/- 115 mg.h/L, respectively. Cefepime plasma concentrations were above the MIC90 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7 mg/L) for approximately 80% of the time and in the case of Enterobacteriaceae (0.5 mg/L) for 100% of the time. The more prolonged T1/2 in comparison with young healthy volunteers (T1/2 = 2.1 h) is consistent with the changes in renal function associated with increased age, and is comparable to data obtained in healthy elderly subjects (T1/2 = 3.7 h). Cmax, AUC and Cl(tot) were more variable than those observed in previous studies and are probably a reflection of the clinical conditions under which dosing and sampling occurred.

Pharmacokinetics of didanosine and ketoconazole after coadministration to patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of didanosine (DDI) and ketoconazole (KET) were evaluated when the agents were administered alone or concurrently to patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Using a randomized, three-way crossover design, multiple oral doses of DDI (375 mg twice daily for 4 days), KET (200 mg daily for 4 days) or the combination were administered under fasting conditions. When DDI and KET were coadministered, KET was given 2 hours before the morning dose of didanosine. Serial blood samples and total urine output were a collected after the administration of a final single dose on day 5 of each treatment session. Samples were analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)/ultraviolet (UV) or fluorescence methods specific for unchanged DDI (plasma and urine) or KET (plasma only). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. The average DDI maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax) value at steady state was significantly less when DDI was administered with KET (1836 ng/mL) than when DDI was administered alone (2094 ng/mL), although the magnitude of the decrease was only 12%. Didanosine area under the curve (AUC(0-tau)) for the combination (2872 hr.ng/mL) was 8% less than when DDI was given alone (3107 hr.ng/mL); the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences among the other evaluated parameters (time to reach peak concentration [tmax], half-life [t1/2], renal clearance [CLR], or urinary recovery [UR]) between the two DDI treatments. There were no significant differences among any of the pharmacokinetic parameters between the two KET treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cefepime pharmacokinetics in cystic fibrosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the disposition of cefepime in patients with cystic fibrosis compared with healthy controls. DESIGN: Open-label, single-dose study. SETTING: Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique Clinique, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. PATIENTS AND SUBJECTS: Twelve patients with the confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) and 12 healthy volunteers. One subject with CF withdrew for personal reasons; the data of another patient were excluded from the evaluation of renal values due to incomplete urine collection. INTERVENTIONS: A single 2000-mg dose of cefepime was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Healthy subjects did not use any other drugs throughout the study. Those with CF refrained from taking prophylactic antibiotics prior to and during the study, but continued to use pancreatic enzymes, multivitamins, and beta-agonist and/or steroid inhalers. One patient continued insulin treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cefepime's maximum concentration was approximately 150 micrograms/ml at the end of the infusion, half-life 2-2.5 hours, and urinary recovery 80% in both groups. No statistically significant difference was seen in any of the pharmacokinetic values between the groups, except for the mean residence time (2.03 +/- 0.26 vs 2.39 +/- 0.37 hrs; p < 0.02). Total clearance was 19% higher in patients with CF than in healthy volunteers (119.7 +/- 20.1 vs 103.5 +/- 19.8 ml/min), perhaps due to higher renal (95.1 +/- 12.4 vs 85.1 +/- 12.0 ml/min) and/or nonrenal (25.4 +/- 13.1 vs 18.4 +/- 12.0 ml/min) clearances in subjects with CF. CONCLUSIONS: The disposition of cefepime is not significantly affected by CF, and dosage adjustment appears not to be necessary in these patients.

Biopharmaceutics of didanosine in humans and in a model for acid-labile drugs, the pentagastrin-pretreated dog.

Didanosine is a purine nucleoside analogue approved for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. It is extremely unstable at pH values less than 3 and requires protection against gastric acid-induced hydrolysis. Beagle dogs pretreated with pentagastrin, an analogue of gastrin that reproducibly stimulates gastric acid secretion, have been used to screen different didanosine formulations. The absolute bioavailability of didanosine from a saline solution decreased from approximately 43% in untreated dogs to 8% after pretreatment with pentagastrin. Administration of buffered solution of didanosine to untreated and pretreated dogs yielded bioavailability estimates of 37 and 30%, respectively. In humans, the bioavailability from a similar buffered solution was approximately 40%. Pentagastrin-pretreated dogs were used to evaluate four new products relative to a citrate-phosphate buffer sachet, the formulation selected for large-scale clinical trials in humans. Two of these new formulations, a chewable tablet and an antacid suspension, were more bioavailable then the reference sachet. This also proved to be true in man, necessitating an adjustment in the dose of didanosine when administered as the chewable tablet. Dogs pretreated with pentagastrin accurately predicted the improved bioavailability of new didanosine formulations prior to clinical use. This animal model may be helpful in evaluating the biopharmaceutics of other acid-labile drugs.

Effect of time of food administration on the bioavailability of didanosine from a chewable tablet formulation.

The effect of the time of food administration on the bioavailability of didanosine, administered as a 300-mg dose of a chewable tablet formulation, was evaluated in 10 men seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but free of any symptoms of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Using an open, randomized, balanced, incomplete block crossover study design, each patient received the dose of didanosine under four of the five following conditions: (1) after an overnight fast, (2) 30 minutes before a meal, (3) 1 hour before a meal, (4) 1 hour after a meal, or (5) 2 hours after a meal. The meal consisted of a standard high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, consumed over a 15-minute period. Serial blood samples and the total urinary output were collected over a 12-hour interval after each dose for analysis using validated high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)/ultraviolet (UV) methods. Concentration data were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters using noncompartmental methods. There were no significant differences among the fasting, 30-minute before, and 1-hour before the meal treatments with respect to maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)), or urinary recovery (%UR). Values for Cmax, AUC(0-infinity), and %UR observed for the 1 and 2 hours after the meal treatments were significantly less than those obtained under either fasting conditions or before the meal. There were no significant differences among any of the treatments with respect to time to reach peak concentration (tmax), half-life (t1/2), or renal clearance (CLR).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relation between plasma concentrations of didanosine and markers of antiviral efficacy in adults with AIDS or AIDS-related complex.

The relation between the average steady-state plasma concentration (Cpss) of didanosine and selected measures of efficacy, such as CD4 cell count, p24 antigenemia, and weight gain, was evaluated in patients participating in a phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study. All patients were diagnosed as having AIDS or severe AIDS-related complex. These individuals first received intravenous didanosine for 2 weeks at doses of 0.8-33 mg/(kg.d) and then took the drug orally at twice the intravenous dose. Cpss values were calculated on the basis of apparent oral clearance after 4 weeks of oral administration and average daily dose over the first 12 weeks of the study. These data were available for 61 patients enrolled at three clinical sites. High values for Cpss were strongly correlated with an increase in CD4 count (P = .006), a decrease in serum levels of p24 antigen (P = .006), and weight gain (P = .0001) at week 12. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of Cpss on response (as judged by the three criteria just mentioned) after adjustment for other potential factors related to infection with human immunodeficiency virus. The baseline CD4 cell count and the status with regard to prior zidovudine therapy were related to the CD4 response. However, the odds that a response would include all three parameters were nearly twice as high when the Cpss value increased by twofold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of metoclopramide and loperamide on the pharmacokinetics of didanosine in HIV seropositive asymptomatic male and female patients.

The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered didanosine were evaluated in 6 male and 6 female HIV seropositive patients to determine the effect of pretreatment with metoclopramide, an inducer of gastrointestinal motility, and loperamide, which retards motility. Using a randomized, balanced, crossover design, each patient received the following three treatments under fasting conditions: didanosine as a single agent, didanosine 5 min after a single 10 mg intravenous dose of metoclopramide, and didanosine 1 h after the final of 4 doses, 4 mg each, of loperamide. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for up to 12 h after each dose. Plasma and urine aliquots were analysed for intact didanosine using HPLC with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameter values were calculated using noncompartmental methods. The mean Cmax values were significantly greater for the didanosine single agent (2.04 micrograms.ml-1) and didanosine with metoclopramide (2.30 micrograms.ml-1) treatments than for the combination of didanosine with loperamide (1.57 microgram.ml-1). The t1/2 in males was significantly greater than in females for the didanosine (1.75 vs 1.12 h, respectively) and didanosine with metoclopramide treatments (1.74 vs 1.20 h, respectively). No significant treatment or gender effects were observed for AUC or UR (urinary recovery). The pharmacokinetics of didanosine were not altered appreciably by dosing with metoclopramide. Administration with loperamide affected the rate but not the extent of absorption. There were no clinically relevant differences between males and females in the disposition of didanosine.

Pharmacokinetic-interaction study of didanosine and ranitidine in patients seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus.

The potential pharmacokinetic interactions between didanosine, an acid-labile antiretroviral agent, and ranitidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, were evaluated by a crossover study of 12 male patients seropositive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Single oral doses of 375 mg of didanosine, formulated as a citrate-phosphate-buffered sachet, or of 150 mg of ranitidine were administered alone or in combination (ranitidine was given 2 h prior to didanosine). Serial blood samples and total urinary output were collected after each treatment and analyzed for didanosine and/or ranitidine by validated high-performance liquid chromatography-UV assay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. There were significant increases in mean area under the curve from time zero to infinity and mean urinary recovery for didanosine given in combination with ranitidine compared with those for didanosine alone. There were no significant differences between didanosine coadministered with ranitidine and didanosine alone in the respective mean peak concentrations in plasma, times to peak, elimination half-lives, or renal clearances. The mean area under the curve for ranitidine given with didanosine was significantly less than that for ranitidine given alone. There were no significant differences between the mean peak concentrations in plasma, times to peak, elimination half-lives, renal clearances, or urinary recovery values for ranitidine coadministered with didanosine and values for ranitidine given alone. These data demonstrate that administration of didanosine 2 h after ranitidine will result in a minor increase in the bioavailability of didanosine. A modification in the dose of didanosine or ranitidine is not necessary if the dose of ranitidine precedes that of didanosine by 2 h.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between cefepime and amikacin in humans.

The interaction potential between cefepime and amikacin was investigated in a steady-state pharmacokinetic study in 16 healthy male subjects. Eight subjects (group A) received a first course of 2,000 mg of cefepime; this was followed by a second course of 2,000 mg of cefepime with 300 mg of amikacin and a third course of 2,000 mg of cefepime. Eight other subjects (group B) received a first course of 300 mg of amikacin, a second course of 300 mg of amikacin with 2,000 mg of cefepime, and a third course of 300 mg of amikacin. Each course consisted of four consecutive doses administered every 8 h as 30-min intravenous infusions. Serial plasma and urine samples, which were collected after administration of the fourth dose of each course, were assayed for cefepime and/or amikacin by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assays. Trough levels of cefepime and amikacin indicated that these antibiotics attained a steady state prior to administration of the fourth dose of each course. Key pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were determined by noncompartmental methods. The peak concentrations of cefepime and amikacin in plasma when the drugs were given alone were about 160 and 27 micrograms/ml, respectively. Levels of each antibiotic in plasma declined, with an apparent half-life of approximately 2.2 h. Urinary recovery of cefepime and amikacin accounted for more than 85% of the administered dose of each antibiotic. Mean renal clearances for cefepime and amikacin ranged from 79 to 95 ml/min and suggested that glomerular filtration is the primary excretion mechanism. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the pharmacokinetic parameters of cefepime following the concurrent administration of amikacin and following the discontinuation of the amikacin following the concurrent administration of cefepime and following the discontinuation of the cefepime therapy were not significantly altered. Cefepime and amikacin can be coadministered to patients with normal renal function by using the standard recommended dosing regimens.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime were studied in 10 male patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy. Five patients received a single 1,000-mg dose and the other five received a single 2,000-mg dose; all doses were given as 30-min intravenous infusions. Serial plasma, urine, and peritoneal dialysate samples were collected; and the concentrations of cefepime in these fluids were measured over 72 h by using a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with UV detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. The peak concentrations in plasma and the areas under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve for the 2,000-mg dose group were twice as high as those observed for the 1,000-mg dose group. The elimination half-life of cefepime was about 18 h and was independent of the dose. The steady-state volume of distribution was about 22 liters, and values for the 1,000- and 2,000-mg doses were not significantly different. The values for total body clearance and peritoneal dialysis clearance were about 15 and 4 ml/min, respectively. No dose dependency was observed for the clearance estimates. Over the 72-h sampling period, about 26% of the dose was excreted intact into the peritoneal dialysis fluid. For 48 h postdose, mean concentrations of cefepime in dialysate at the end of each dialysis interval exceeded the reported MICs for 90% of the isolates (MIC90s) for bacteria which commonly cause peritonitis resulting from continuous peritoneal dialysis. A parenteral dose of 1,000 or 2,000 mg of cefepime every 48 h would maintain the antibiotic levels in plasma and peritoneal fluid above the MIC90s for the most susceptible bacteria for the treatment of systemic and intraperitoneal infections [corrected].

Cefepime. Pharmacokinetics and clinical response in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To measure first-dose and steady-state plasma, urine, and sputum concentrations of cefepime and make preliminary assessments of the clinical efficacy of cefepime in patients with cystic fibrosis. DESIGN: Open noncomparative clinical trial. SETTING: Memorial Miller Children's Hospital of Long Beach, Calif. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve patients, aged 4 to 41 years, with a confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchopulmonary infections. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received cefepime at 50 mg/kg per dose (maximum dose, 2 g per dose) given intravenously every 8 hours. Clinical evaluations, pulmonary function tests, quantitative sputum cultures, and sensitivity testing were performed before, at the end of, and 2 weeks after therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) peak plasma concentrations after the first dose were 148.2 (36.6) mg/L; the following other values were included: half-life, 1.59 (0.46) hours; area under the curve, 292 (94) microgram/h per milliliter; total-body clearance, 3.01 (1.46) mL/min per kilogram; volume of distribution at steady state, 0.32 (0.10) L/kg; and percent of dose recovered in urine, 52% (27%). Steady-state and first-dose values were similar. Trough levels varied from 6.4 to 7.2 mg/L. Mean (+/- SD) sputum concentrations at steady state varied from 6.3 (5.4) to 4.8 (2.3) mg/L. At completion of therapy, nine of 10 patients' conditions were improved as indicated by clinical scores (greater than 10 points), forced vital capacity (greater than 10%), and a greater than or equal to 1 log decrease in sputum bacterial concentration. Cefepime was well tolerated in 10 patients, but rash and light-headedness developed in two patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration90 increased from the start (64 mg/L) to the end of therapy (256 mg/L) and was unchanged 2 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Based on these data and the potential advantage of a single agent for the treatment of mixed infections (Staphylococcus aureus and P aeruginosa), comparative clinical trials of cefepime and standard therapy for bronchopulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis appear to be warranted.