Quantitative Analysis of Translatory Movements in Patients With Horizontal Strabismus.

Purpose: To investigate translatory movement during the lateral gaze in patients with horizontal strabismus using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: Patients with esotropia or exotropia and normal controls underwent orbital magnetic resonance imaging during the central gaze and lateral gaze at 40°. The position of the static tissues was superimposed three-dimensionally for all gazes using a self-developed software, allowing the analysis of the net eyeball movement. Then, the eyeball centroid coordinates were extracted for each gaze, and the distance and direction of centroid movement from the central to lateral gaze were calculated. Results: The mean distance ± standard deviation of the centroid movement was 1.0 ± 0.5 mm during abduction in the exotropia group, which was significantly longer than that in the esotropia (0.6 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.003) and control (0.7 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.002) groups. Conversely, the centroid moved farther in the esotropia group (0.9 ± 0.3 mm) than the exotropia (0.6 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.005) and control (0.7 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.023) groups during adduction. Posterior translation during abduction was longer in the exotropia group (-0.8 ± 0.3 mm) compared with the esotropia (-0.5 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.017) and control (-0.4 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.001) groups, whereas that during adduction was longer in the esotropia group (-0.4 ± 0.4 mm) than the exotropia (-0.1 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.033) and control (-0.1 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.026) groups. Conclusions: During abduction, more translatory movement occurred in the exotropia group, whereas the centroid moved farther in the esotropia group during adduction. The translatory movement difference between both strabismus groups implies that there is a difference in biomechanics among the types of strabismus.

Investigation of MicroRNA Expression in Anterior Lens Capsules of Senile Cataract Patients and MicroRNA Differences According to the Cataract Type.

Purpose: We investigated the microRNAs (miRNAs) expression in the anterior lens capsules of patients with senile cataract and compared it to that in the anterior lens capsules of healthy controls. Moreover, we compared the differences in miRNAs expression according to the types of cataracts. Methods: Individual lens epithelium samples were collected from 33 senile patients and 10 controls. The cataract patients were classified into cortical, nuclear, posterior and anterior subcapsular and mixed. The expression of 12 different miRNAs in lens epithelium was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction and compared between the senile cataract patients and controls. The differences of miRNA levels according to cataract type were analyzed. Results: The expression levels of let-7g-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-23b-3p, and miR-125a-5p were significantly upregulated in patients with senile cataract when compared with those in the control group (P < 0.05). The expressions of let-7a-5p, let-7d-5p, miR-16-5p and miR-22-3p were significantly downregulated in the senile cataracts (P < 0.05). Let-7a-5p, let-7d-5p, let-7g-5p and mir-23b-3p had significant difference in expression between nuclear and anterior subcapsular cataracts. Conclusions: The eight differentially expressed miRNAs may be involved in the pathogenesis of senile cataract, in particular, related to oxidative stress and autophagy. Translational Relevance: We infer that several miRNAs in lens epithelial cells are promising candidate biomarkers of senile cataracts.

Analgesic effects of tramadol during panretinal photocoagulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of tramadol for the reduction of pain in panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). METHODS: A double-masked randomized controlled study was performed. Fifty-eight eyes in 29 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were enrolled. The eyes of the patients were randomized into two groups. Group A received an empty capsule. Group B received an oral intake of 100 mg tramadol. The capsule used in Group A had the same appearance as that used in Group B. Pain during PRP was assessed using a visual analog scale. Vital signs, including blood pressure and heart rate, were measured. RESULTS: The mean pain scores for groups A and B were 4.80+/-2.10 and 3.83+/-1.82 (p=0.09). There were no significant differences in the mean pain scores between the two groups. More patients in group A complained of greater pain than moderate intensity (visual analogue scale=4). Systemic blood pressure increased significantly in group A after laser treatment. However, there were no significant differences in the diastolic blood pressure changes between the two groups. We found no statistical correlation in the heart rate changes. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to prove that tramadol is effective for pain relief because of the small sample size. However, tramadol was effective for the relief of more severe pain. It was also found to stabilize vital sign changes, such as systolic blood pressure during PRP.