Antibiotic Use and Surgical Site Infections in Immunocompromised Patients After Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: As Mohs micrographic surgery becomes more widely used in immunosuppressed patients, it is important to understand the risks in this unique population. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether immunosuppressed patients are at an increased risk for surgical site infection and evaluate the utility of postoperative antibiotics for the prevention of surgical site infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery between October 9, 2014, and August 20, 2021, was performed. RESULTS: Five thousand eight hundred eighty-six independent cases were identified. Factors associated with an increased incidence of antibiotic use included preoperative lesion size >40 mm (86.7%, n = 13; p < .01) and high-risk lesion location (46.4%, n = 1,268; p < .01). Patients were not more likely to be prescribed antibiotics if immunosuppressed (37.0%, n = 269 vs 34.2%, n = 1765; p = .14), and immunosuppression was not independently associated with antibiotic use on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.5). Infection rates were similar between immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients (2.1%, n = 15 vs 1.6%, n = 80, respectively; p = .30). In immunosuppressed patients, antibiotic use did not decrease the likelihood of infection (3.0%, n = 8 vs 1.5%, n = 7; p = .19). CONCLUSION: There was no association between immunosuppression and surgical infection rate. Furthermore, postoperative antibiotics should not be indicated in these patients unless other high-risk criteria exist.

Unprecedented: the toxic synergism of Covid-19 and climate change.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review and compare the constellations of causes and consequences of the two current pandemics, Covid-19 and climate change. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been a transient counterbalancing, in which the response to Covid-19 has briefly mitigated pollution and greenhouse gasses. This divergence belies multiple commonalities of cause and effect. SUMMARY: The convergence of these two pandemics is unprecedented. Although at first glance, they appear to be completely unrelated, they share striking commonalities. Both are caused by human behaviors, and some of those behaviors contribute to both pandemics at the same time. Both illustrate the fact that isolation is not an option; these are global issues that inescapably affect all persons and all nations. Both incur prodigious current and anticipated costs. Both have similar societal impacts, and disproportionately harm those with lesser resources, widening the gap between the 'haves and the have-nots.' One can only hope that the devastation caused by these unprecedented pandemics will lead to increased awareness of how human beings have helped to create them and how our responses can and will shape our future.

Practitioner Education and Feedback to Decrease Ciprofloxacin Prescriptions in Patients with Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis.

CONTEXT: Current guidelines recommend a nonfluoroquinolone agent as first-line treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) because of concerns of antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To test whether a multifaceted intervention involving education and feedback reduced primary care practitioners' ciprofloxacin prescriptions for AUC therapy. DESIGN: Primary care practitioners at 3 medical offices participated: 65 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. Intervention group participants received an educational lecture and emailed summary of antimicrobial guidelines, their AUC prescriptions were audited, and feedback was provided on inappropriate antibiotic choices. Prescriptions at AUC encounters were tracked during baseline, intervention, and postintervention periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of AUC encounters at which ciprofloxacin was prescribed vs recommended first-line antibiotics. RESULTS: Intervention group participants had 5262 eligible AUC encounters, and control group participants had 5473. At baseline, ciprofloxacin was prescribed at 29.7% and 33.7% of eligible AUC encounters in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p = 0.003). After intervention, ciprofloxacin was prescribed at 10.8% of eligible AUC encounters in the intervention group and 34.3% in the control (p < 0.001). Adjusted odds ratios of ciprofloxacin prescription for AUC therapy were significantly lower in the intervention group during postintervention and intervention periods vs baseline (0.29, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-0.44, p < 0.001 and 0.80, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-0.97, p = 0.03). Adjusted odds ratios did not change over time in the controls. CONCLUSION: Educating primary care practitioners and conducting audit and feedback reduced their prescriptions of ciprofloxacin for AUC therapy.